there needs to be a vote for both. there could be a game with grizzly graphics, but if its terrible game play it sucks. same with the other way around, savage gameplay would be terrible if u cant see things due to poor graphics
Graphics vs. Gameplay
Started by
Guest_queyjin
, Jan 18 2006 07:45 PM
662 replies to this topic
#127
jwilson
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 548 posts
Red Rider
Reputation: 8
Neutral
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:49 AM
Yeah I agree both are important. I say graphics are most important because bad graphics can cause bad gameplay.
Sail!
#128
Guest_save me
Guest_save me
-
- Guest
Posted 09 August 2006 - 01:24 PM
Great gameplay can still save games with bad graphics. Compare the lion king and aladin games on the console then take a look at their gameboy counterpart. its basically the same game, but the graphics on the GB were less vobrant. What saved it was the gameplay. Graphics do not matter if the gameplay is bad (Sonic 3D comes to mind). Another example could be the success of Brave Fencer on the PS and the failure of ith sequel, Samurai Legend due to poor gameplay. Heck, right now Im playing the original Shining Force on my still functioning megadrive but I still havent gotten around playing shining tears for the PS2.
#129
Guest_juandio
Guest_juandio
-
- Guest
Posted 09 August 2006 - 03:41 PM
Gameplay. I can play a good game regardless of it's grafics.(obviously if they are way too bad, that's another story)
#130
Guest_karynn
Guest_karynn
-
- Guest
Posted 11 August 2006 - 06:02 AM
gameplay of course. obviously, graphics need to be decent so you can actually see something 
hehe, but if a game were really really really beautiful, i might be convinced otherwise. if not, sure, i'll put up with nasty graphics for good gameplay anyday.
hehe, but if a game were really really really beautiful, i might be convinced otherwise. if not, sure, i'll put up with nasty graphics for good gameplay anyday.
#131
Guest_vanechan
Guest_vanechan
-
- Guest
Posted 11 August 2006 - 07:32 AM
I choose always gameplay i really love rpgs and tactics games so i know is important the graphics in the game but is more important get fun playing it. If the game is boring there´s not graphic that make play it
#133
Guest_iniquity
Guest_iniquity
-
- Guest
Posted 11 August 2006 - 08:11 AM
Graphics matter. Sure they do. But I've seen games with crappy graphics that were just a blast to play. Some games are actually better with bad graphics. It adds a certain quality to it.
#134
Guest_om3n_7
Guest_om3n_7
-
- Guest
Posted 11 August 2006 - 11:55 AM
um...gameplay of course...graphics are just like the icing on the cake so to speak...because i would never play a sh*ty boring game just because it looked good...>>
#135
Baladas
-
- Active Member
-
- 663 posts
Nerevarine
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 12 August 2006 - 04:48 AM
Gameplay is what makes the game if you go all graphics and no gameplay what do you get Fable! 
#136
Guest_LoveDefying
Guest_LoveDefying
-
- Guest
Posted 12 August 2006 - 04:51 AM
Gameplay is more important but graphics are also a factor, it would probably be 75% Gameplay and 25% Graphics
#137
Guest__DeathBlitzX_
Guest__DeathBlitzX_
-
- Guest
Posted 12 August 2006 - 06:05 AM
I chose gameplay, but still if the graphics are very unbearable i won't play it
#138
Guest_FasgoSilvermoon
Guest_FasgoSilvermoon
-
- Guest
Posted 12 August 2006 - 08:26 PM
Gameplay. But hey, there are games with horrible graphics and gameplay. *coughcoughaidynchroniclescoughcough*
#139
Guest_barbeque
Guest_barbeque
-
- Guest
Posted 13 August 2006 - 02:32 AM
a game is nothing without good gameplay.
#141
Guest_dragonstance
Guest_dragonstance
-
- Guest
Posted 21 August 2006 - 07:30 AM
Most certainly the gameplay, because when I was younger I played the systems like Atari, which had horrible graphics but none the less was a great system.
#142
Guest_BloodredValentine
Guest_BloodredValentine
-
- Guest
Posted 21 August 2006 - 09:06 PM
Gameplay. Sure it can be pretty, but I'd get tired of it if the gameplay was boring and horrible. And plus, some of the high quality gameplay lags my incredibly slow computer.
#143
Guest_snake?SNAKE?SNAKEEEEEEE!
Guest_snake?SNAKE?SNAKEEEEEEE!
-
- Guest
Posted 21 August 2006 - 09:08 PM
Gameplay for sure, I can stand playing a game with bad grafics if it's a good game
#144
Guest_<< WAM >>
Guest_<< WAM >>
-
- Guest
Posted 22 August 2006 - 01:30 AM
for me, ive played pretty well thought out games but the graphice were just horrible. So i would enjoy playing a game with good graphice once in a while...
#145
Guest_The Nin Fort
Guest_The Nin Fort
-
- Guest
Posted 22 August 2006 - 11:08 AM
I look for gameplay. But that doesn't mean I don't look for decent graphics.
#146
Guest_hatyliu
Guest_hatyliu
-
- Guest
Posted 22 August 2006 - 01:10 PM
Gameplay.There are so many games that have no graphics AT ALL. But so many people still play them. Reason being, gameplay is everything in a game. You don't just play one to stare a pretty pictures, do you? 
#147
Guest_sasuke`
Guest_sasuke`
-
- Guest
Posted 22 August 2006 - 06:43 PM
gameplay as long as it's a good game I don't care about the grapics.
#148
Guest_The Muffinmaster
Guest_The Muffinmaster
-
- Guest
Posted 23 August 2006 - 08:34 PM
Gameplay definitely. I don't understand people who only care about graphics.Games like Super Mario world didn't have good graphics, but it's still such an awesome game.
#149
Guest_xMikomix
Guest_xMikomix
-
- Guest
Posted 24 August 2006 - 12:54 AM
I'd say both in a game are the best 
but if this game only has good graphics and the actual game sucks, I'd choose a good game with bad graphics anyday. So I guess gameplay's more important 
but if this game only has good graphics and the actual game sucks, I'd choose a good game with bad graphics anyday. So I guess gameplay's more important
#150
Guest_Monick
Guest_Monick
-
- Guest
Posted 10 September 2006 - 12:47 AM
gameplay ;P is more mportante! 
