Smash Brothers, hands down, foot down, face down. No question about it. Smash Brothers would be AWESOME on DS, with a list of characters to rival SSMBM's lineup complete with unlockable areas and characters. Also, with Wi-Fi, you should be able to choose any map or character that you've unlocked. Oh, and there should be the screen at the bottom that shows the relative position fo the character that you're using, but not the entire screen, then at the top there would be character damage percents, a minimap with blips to show all locations o0f characters and items, and other statistical stuff like lives left. That would be totally wicked.
Smash Bros or Mario Party
Started by
Guest_psychorat
, Feb 03 2006 11:33 AM
1910 replies to this topic
#127
Guest_ssj kirby
Guest_ssj kirby
-
- Guest
Posted 20 April 2006 - 03:18 AM
i agree with wat u just sed but something i dont agree with is how someone sed it wudnt be fast enuff, i mean look at sonic and such, that was extremely fast gameplay but something they wud need wud b more maps and characters and mabye stuff to do other than just fight
#128
Guest_crzdmaniac123
Guest_crzdmaniac123
-
- Guest
Posted 20 April 2006 - 03:35 AM
I believe you were referring to me with that statement... let me clarify:I don't mean to say the DS can't handle the fast gameplay. However, hands down the revolution will be more powerful, no dispute there. Thus in order for possible development on the gameplay, you know adding new features, making it faster and more furious, etc... The revolution would make for a smoother transition with these new features because it would just be able to handle them better with the more powerful engine. I still think the DS could turn out a nice Smash game, but economically I think that Mario Party would be better served on the DS if they could only put one of the two out for the DS.
#129
Guest_blooraguard
Guest_blooraguard
-
- Guest
Posted 20 April 2006 - 03:58 AM
Super smash is a great game, id never give it away ...mario party is a crappy game...... just BADi vote SSB
#130
hahahaha
-
- Active Member
-
- 13 posts
Egg
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:22 AM
Super smash brothers... Mario party would be sweet too but zsaber is right, the games are too long for a portable multiplayer game.
#131
Guest_homeskillet
Guest_homeskillet
-
- Guest
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:11 AM
i like mario party more because the goal is always different although you do get to beat the crap out of people in smash bros...hahaha i enjoy that too...
#132
Guest_adamkungl
Guest_adamkungl
-
- Guest
Posted 20 April 2006 - 04:35 PM
What does Smash Bros being on Rev have to do with anything. When has Nintendo ever kept their franchises to only consoles. Smash Bros >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mario Party. That game got boring as soon as i bought one. Mario Party is only fun at someone elses house.
#133
Guest_lewii_911
Guest_lewii_911
-
- Guest
Posted 21 April 2006 - 02:09 AM
obviously smash bros' coz i neva get bored of it but mario party isnt mi favorite. 
#134
Guest_ssj kirby
Guest_ssj kirby
-
- Guest
Posted 22 April 2006 - 12:41 AM
Oh, thats what that guy ment... something that they could do even thouh they never would, would to make a SSB or MP for both the DS and the revolution
#135
Guest_res1
Guest_res1
-
- Guest
Posted 22 April 2006 - 01:22 AM
I'm not a big fan of either, but if i'm only given the choice of theese two Nintendo franchises I'll have to side with Smash Bros camp. 
#136
Guest_Smokey the Crow
Guest_Smokey the Crow
-
- Guest
Posted 22 April 2006 - 01:28 AM
Wow. That's not a hard decision at all. Super Smash Bros, any day.
#138
Guest_Doctor Dirty
Guest_Doctor Dirty
-
- Guest
Posted 22 April 2006 - 07:22 AM
Smash Bros. is so much better than Mario Party. The only good Mario Party was the 2nd one.
#139
Guest_StarmanOmega
Guest_StarmanOmega
-
- Guest
Posted 22 April 2006 - 04:05 PM
Smash of course...mario party got a little old after the first 3
#140
Guest_Namine
Guest_Namine
-
- Guest
Posted 22 April 2006 - 10:32 PM
Have to go with SSB here. I'm not a fan of multiplayer games on handhelds though.
#141
Guest_Shado_3465
Guest_Shado_3465
-
- Guest
Posted 28 April 2006 - 03:21 PM
Smash Bros., hands down. Its way more fun than Mario Party.
#142
Guest_Jayson58
Guest_Jayson58
-
- Guest
Posted 28 April 2006 - 06:22 PM
Smash Bros. all the way. Even though I'm a Mario Party Pimp, I think the ojnline factor alone for Smash Bros. would be better than any other WiFi game.That is, as long as Ness is still in the game.Though, Mario Party would definitely be a whole lot of fun having a shitload of new touchscreen minigames. Especially if they're online enabled.Let's just hope Nintendo has some ideas going around too. Hell, maybe we'll see both of them!
#143
Guest_newfire
Guest_newfire
-
- Guest
Posted 29 April 2006 - 03:35 AM
Smash Bros would be better than anything!HiI'm very interested, how you would decide!please tell me!
#144
Guest_WackyB207
Guest_WackyB207
-
- Guest
Posted 29 April 2006 - 05:49 AM
This shouldn't even be a contest! Super Smash Bros clearly trumps Mario Party. Even though they are different genres and all that...The better comparison (although just as different) would have been the Guilty Gear game.
#145
Guest_Automatikk
Guest_Automatikk
-
- Guest
Posted 29 April 2006 - 01:52 PM
hi,smash brothers i like more than mario party...i like to smash these pokemons
#147
Guest_Bursche
Guest_Bursche
-
- Guest
Posted 30 April 2006 - 04:43 AM
Super Smash for the win.
#148
Pr0digy
-
- Active Member
-
- 57 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 30 April 2006 - 04:44 AM
smash but it would be kinda hard to play it with a control pad 
#149
Guest_flamewolf12
Guest_flamewolf12
-
- Guest
Posted 01 May 2006 - 09:24 AM
Smash brothers is always awsome. I would only get it if they make online.
#150
Guest_jak01
Guest_jak01
-
- Guest
Posted 01 May 2006 - 10:10 AM
mario party ............jak01..........
............jak01..........
