Sometimes yes,all dbz sequels rule
Are sequels as good?
Started by
Guest_crash6969
, Feb 13 2006 06:56 AM
162 replies to this topic
#27
Guest_web-weaver
Guest_web-weaver
-
- Guest
Posted 21 February 2006 - 05:18 AM
i think that it depends on the game.
#28
Guest_Galili
Guest_Galili
-
- Guest
Posted 26 February 2006 - 07:06 PM
potentially, they are... They usually aren't, but they can be.
#29
Guest_GBAROMS2005
Guest_GBAROMS2005
-
- Guest
Posted 27 February 2006 - 02:27 AM
Most of the time, sequels are better. In games sequels usually are harder and have more features than the original.
#30
NibelungValesti
-
- Active Member
-
- 1,157 posts
Holy Dragon
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 19 September 2006 - 04:59 AM
I'd say games in the same series get worse and worse if you call that a sequel. Like Lunar Dragonsong and Fire Emblem 8, two disappointments. I voted 25% because of GS2.
Working on Knights in the Nightmare. Going to get around to Rondo of Swords. Hoping to find inspiration for Etrian.
Previously TheLoneCheese
Previously TheLoneCheese
#31
Guest_troherg
Guest_troherg
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 06:15 AM
Depends on the type of sequel, if its a storyline sequel like Golden Sun its usually as good, but a sequel to make a new story like Advance Wars gets old.
#32
Guest_MAxDarkSol
Guest_MAxDarkSol
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 09:07 AM
depends, whether they made the sequels as fillers, or to continue the storyline AND make it great ( e.g. GS)
#33
Guest_freedom_wc
Guest_freedom_wc
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 02:56 PM
I agree with you too.depends, whether they made the sequels as fillers, or to continue the storyline AND make it great ( e.g. GS)
#34
Guest_Caterpie Master
Guest_Caterpie Master
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 05:41 PM
I think sequels are sometimes bad, sometimes good.Half for me.
#35
Guest_abrahem love 2006
Guest_abrahem love 2006
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 05:56 PM
sequels as good as the original? 100% haha 
#36
Guest_drai
Guest_drai
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 06:10 PM
It all depends on the game and the company who is making the sequal. But hers the thing there have been games that have were not bad and then their sequal was even better apparently summon knight 2 for example is going to be offering a few more things than summon knight. However this can also work vise versa.
#37
Guest_bladerunna
Guest_bladerunna
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 06:11 PM
well sequels in my opinion are okeg super smash bros now is better than it was, and should be better on the wii
#38
Guest_pr1nce0fpwnag3
Guest_pr1nce0fpwnag3
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 09:35 PM
depends what you mean.Movies : hardly ever :'( Video Games : hardly never 
Books: nobody reads books
Books: nobody reads books
#39
Guest_Ultimaflame0
Guest_Ultimaflame0
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2006 - 10:04 PM
Sorry, but I always think the first game they make is the best. I'm not a big fan of sequals, just look at what is happening with Final Fantasy. It seems they are stretching it out so much that each game seems to get worse and worse.
#40
Guest_kutu
Guest_kutu
-
- Guest
Posted 25 September 2006 - 11:31 PM
They suck, nothing ever beats the original.
#41
Guest_markopolo
Guest_markopolo
-
- Guest
Posted 25 September 2006 - 11:53 PM
sometimes they are and other times, not so much. depends on how the sequel continues from the origanal. if 2 games or movies are half and half, well it'll probably closely alike. if they're totally different, well, it might suck.
#42
Guest_jalius
Guest_jalius
-
- Guest
Posted 25 September 2006 - 11:54 PM
wll. it certainly depends on the addictive rating of the first game.. if gamers were addictd to the first then they'd probably think the sequel would be worth getting as well.. like me.. about SummonNight.. 
#43
Guest_freestyle_champ
Guest_freestyle_champ
-
- Guest
Posted 26 September 2006 - 02:52 PM
It really depends of what game for example the sequel for fire emblem from 2002 and 2003 was great i mean the first had a good story that evolved around the hero on the next fire emblem so in that case the sequel was better the same happens with advance wars 2
#44
Guest_henriqueff
Guest_henriqueff
-
- Guest
Posted 26 September 2006 - 05:23 PM
never POINTS were deducted for this post
#45
.Kv
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 5,381 posts
Tiamat
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 26 September 2006 - 06:02 PM
i would have to say half half, since some games are good at first and are improved in the next sequel, but most games actually go downhill in their sequel, such as Advance wars 1 and Advance wars 2, i suppose number 1 was more harder and challenging, but advance wars 2 seems easier and is almost the same as the first
#46
Guest_Juanes
Guest_Juanes
-
- Guest
Posted 26 September 2006 - 06:07 PM
Depends.......A exemple: Golsen Sun is good.....but advance wars i'm don't like much......
#47
Guest_randomT
Guest_randomT
-
- Guest
Posted 26 September 2006 - 06:08 PM
It really depends on what game the sequal is for. For example, Boktai had a VERY bad sequel.
#48
Guest_Sakayushi
Guest_Sakayushi
-
- Guest
Posted 26 September 2006 - 06:33 PM
It just depends on what game ur talking about for example the MMBN sequels were pretty good whereas a lot of other games stink.
#49
Guest_aznmuimui
Guest_aznmuimui
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 02:53 AM
Depends how much I like the game and the characters.
#50
Guest_refreshed
Guest_refreshed
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 01:29 PM
It depends on the game and the makers. If they made a good game, they might make another good one too but it might fail when compared to the previous one. So I am half-half.
