I took Half and Half, but mostly it depends on what games it is.
Are sequels as good?
Started by
Guest_crash6969
, Feb 13 2006 06:56 AM
162 replies to this topic
#52
Guest_baglung
Guest_baglung
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 02:58 PM
[i think its never.]
#53
Guest_Vaynard
Guest_Vaynard
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 03:06 PM
It all depends in the first game or movie of the sequel, if it was really great, you have expectations which can lead to serious disapointment... ( Summon night2 ??? jeje )Just my humble opinion...
#55
Guest_cold-shadow
Guest_cold-shadow
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 05:00 PM
i'd say that its half and half. sometimes the sequels are as good as the first one or that they add a very good perspective to the original and sometimes they have a very bad sequel where as the storyline just wasn't as interesting/original as the first one
#56
Guest_DeHydraFusion
Guest_DeHydraFusion
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 05:07 PM
I would say most of the time sequels are good, its not all of the time
#57
Guest_Stones100
Guest_Stones100
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 06:47 PM
I think that it is half and half. There are some really good sequels out there that I love, but there are also some out there that are terrible and I don't like at all.
Edited by Stones100, 03 December 2006 - 06:48 PM.
#58
Guest_J i n
Guest_J i n
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 06:49 PM
it just all depends on the type of game, and what game the sequel is from, like golden sun and golden sun 2, those were good games. those that failed would be something like the nickelodeon games or along those line.
#59
Guest_Daisho
Guest_Daisho
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 06:51 PM
Golden Sun sequel wasn't that good... poke was awesome... and I have yet to play more sequels ^^ so half and half.
#60
Guest_J i n
Guest_J i n
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2006 - 07:00 PM
Golden sun sequel was good, it received a higher rating than the original golden sun..
#62
peace109
-
- Member
-
- 125 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 December 2006 - 07:12 PM
most of the time sequals are better but there always just as good
#63
Guest_anna.mossity
Guest_anna.mossity
-
- Guest
Posted 28 December 2006 - 06:12 PM
About 75% of the time a sequel is as good or better than its predecessor, just depends on the approach they take
#64
Guest_Rikki R
Guest_Rikki R
-
- Guest
Posted 05 January 2007 - 01:50 PM
Sometimes yes, sometimes they just fail.
#65
Guest_djanos.jonge
Guest_djanos.jonge
-
- Guest
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:23 PM
you are right sequels are known for not being nerly as good as the first version of a game or movy of course there are always games for wich this doesn't count but in most of the cases sequels are just ripofsI am in the not really category, what are your opinions?
#66
Kakashi48
-
- Member
-
- 199 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 06 January 2007 - 05:41 AM
Sequels are usally not better than the first part.
#67
Guest_Yonathan
Guest_Yonathan
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 05:44 AM
It depens it could or could not but thats you're oppinion LOL! 
#68
Guest_Crazykid33333
Guest_Crazykid33333
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 06:38 AM
I think that sequels are only, at maximum, as half good as the previous. If the first game/movie was excellent, the sequel might be worth my time. If the first one wasn't good at all, or if the critics were saying it was all just hipe, then no.
#69
Guest_crajhee
Guest_crajhee
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 07:20 AM
Games probably.Movies maybe.Games usually improve whether graphically or conceptually (usually)But movies....I can't say...(Just recently saw Pirates of the Caribbean 2) =[
#70
Guest_RealSamx
Guest_RealSamx
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 04:45 PM
It depends on whether or not publishers introduce anything new into their game. Some publishers might think that the first game is so successful that they shouldn't add anything new in fear of loss of sales. They just mostly add new missions and weapons, so that it feels more like an expansion.
#71
Guest_burnstein
Guest_burnstein
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 08:59 PM
some sequels can be better but its even most of the time, they can be better or they cant be better so its 50 50 for my experiences.
#72
Guest_ShadowUnseenMaster
Guest_ShadowUnseenMaster
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:03 PM
Most of the time they are good, but for things like pokemon they suck.
#73
Guest_Zap_zappy
Guest_Zap_zappy
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:05 PM
Most of the time as they tend to learn from their mistakes. 
#74
Guest_RandomJo
Guest_RandomJo
-
- Guest
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:10 PM
Some sequels are, some aren't Take golden sun 2 and Super smash bro's meelee. Neither of them really introduced anything new,(except for a few easter eggs and different characters), but it was still just as good, or in some views better.However, in things like Pokemon.. (actually pokemon is the only thing I can think of) ...It's the exact same thing... and repetitive, no new storyline nothing.And there are those in the middle, Summon Knight swordcraft story2, Breath of fire 3, Monster Rancher 2, Improved from the old design, but still, something was missing to give it that "wow" factor.
#75
Guest_XDwolfclaw
Guest_XDwolfclaw
-
- Guest
Posted 07 January 2007 - 07:04 AM
nahh i don't like sequels their boring
