Jump to content


Too many pokemon!!


  • Please log in to reply
1870 replies to this topic

#1676 Guest_Darklight52

Guest_Darklight52
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:00 AM

I agree they should just use the ones they have now and stop making new ones.
  • 0

#1677 Guest_UFC Ultimate Fighter

Guest_UFC Ultimate Fighter
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2008 - 08:36 AM

Some of'em just seem like fillers to me.
  • 0

#1678 Guest_Sheathe

Guest_Sheathe
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2008 - 02:57 PM

Even with Diamond and Pearl (which I am playing right now), I still love the franchise.The Pokemon designs may not be as natural feeling as they once were but that's only because we're all familiar with the 1st and 2nd Gen 251. Some designs are still genius (Piplup for example, is the cutest effer around). Although I still don't feel Lucario can compare to Mewtwo. But then that's a different game we're talking about entirely.
  • 0

#1679 Guest_Hyphykiller23

Guest_Hyphykiller23
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2008 - 08:59 PM

who knows when they'll stop? i have memorized inadvertantly all of them except the diamond and pearl ones
  • 0

#1680 Guest_jackrip36

Guest_jackrip36
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 16 March 2008 - 09:47 PM

it true they have way to many pokemon. but then again its about the same with yugiho, they come out with the new cards and then think they need to put them in the new games and every thing else..it's just another stupid thing that stupid ppl in stupid factorys that get big stupid checks for even more stupid ideas... nuf said
  • 0

#1681 Guest_Purinlove

Guest_Purinlove
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 16 March 2008 - 09:49 PM

Exactly, they're milking a franchise dry...Sadly, they never seem to make things fresh from there.

Edited by Purinlove, 16 March 2008 - 09:50 PM.

  • 0

#1682 Unrefined-Nemesis

Unrefined-Nemesis

    Hatchling

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 92 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 16 March 2008 - 09:50 PM

There is way too many pokemon which I agree on and they should really just stop developing or designing new pokemon rather they should focus an a game with more storyline and darker twist here and there using the existing pokemon as I believe having nearly 500 pokemon is a little too much and the designs for some are a little bit too retarded.
  • 0
Your signature does not comply with the specifications found in the board rules. Please fix this. -DGEmu Staff

#1683 Guest_Slaanash

Guest_Slaanash
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 16 March 2008 - 10:19 PM

Yeah, back in my day we had 150. All the new pokemon look weird now too..
  • 0

#1684 Guest_Nekoshi

Guest_Nekoshi
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 March 2008 - 01:44 AM

Never too many '______' Excess is the basis of modern civilization
  • 0

#1685 Guest_Ketsaki

Guest_Ketsaki
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 March 2008 - 02:02 AM

I don't know if someone said this already cause I didn't read all of these posts, but They have that many Pokemon because every Player have different tastes. So they are trying to give you as many options as possible. Could you imagen that there were only 6 different types of pokemon? and on top of it all you'd only be able to carry 6?(witch is true by the way...) everyone would have the same Pokemon!!!!For example: I would never think of adding Koffing to my team because I just don't like that Pokemon.. but I bet someone else would.I know its alot of Pokemon but if you ask me, I just keep finding new favorites (But Pikachu is unreplacable :(). Saying there are too many Pokemon is like saying there are too many animals, and let not forget Humans are in that Category. Also Pokemon is mainly for little kids, witch is why it doesn't get any more violent than it is. It will always be about goody, goody friendship and all the sh*t (I hope the * saves me from violating rules).
  • 0

#1686 Guest_Bazzard

Guest_Bazzard
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 March 2008 - 02:06 AM

Well, don't you want to be the very best? Like no one ever was? All joking aside, it's to add playabillity and FUN RE-playabillity into the game, which is important because alot of RPGs nowadays lack that.

Edited by Bazzard, 17 March 2008 - 02:08 AM.

  • 0

#1687 Guest_dz012091

Guest_dz012091
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 March 2008 - 02:46 AM

if theres only 150 pokemon its easier to remember them all
  • 0

#1688 Guest_ogmakaveli

Guest_ogmakaveli
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 March 2008 - 03:04 AM

they made money with the first thing, they just gotta find new ways to keep the cash flowing i guess
  • 0

#1689 Guest_ozgamer

Guest_ozgamer
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 March 2008 - 03:12 AM

just trying to get some post points :offtopic:... and yer i agree ... there are waaaaay too many pokemon.. its stupid
  • 0

#1690 Guest_princessks

Guest_princessks
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 April 2008 - 01:14 PM

FINALLY there is someone who sees pokemon the way i do.i wish it would just die a painfull death. i reallly thought the sapphire was the last and thus completed the pokedex and then boom they come out with more and they look even weirder
  • 0

#1691 Guest_hare15

Guest_hare15
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 April 2008 - 01:54 PM

nah, as long as there is kids on earth, pokemon won't die
  • 0

#1692 Mighty Falcon

Mighty Falcon

    Dragon

  • Active Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts
Offline
Current mood: Asleep
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 04 April 2008 - 03:52 PM

Duh, I like the first 150 pokemon when I saw them as a kid in the past. The reason why I don't like too many Pokemon is that I can't keep track on them especially too many legendaries
  • 0

^ Read that, not this.


#1693 Guest_febair

Guest_febair
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 April 2008 - 07:46 PM

All the new ones just arent as original and interesting as the 151. They were clever and there was time and thought put into them, the new ones are just picasso scribbles that resemble elemental animals with some contrived name, and the same damn 300 or so attacks. there may be a lot, but they are all mostly useless, even the new legendaries look like the same old same old.
  • 0

#1694 Guest_divastarz63

Guest_divastarz63
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 April 2008 - 09:29 PM

I'm guessing it's because of the new seasons that keep coming out. I don't know why Ash insists on walking everywhere and doing everything, but I'm guessing it's that...although Diamond was a good game...
  • 0

#1695 Guest_maxthegreat

Guest_maxthegreat
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2008 - 02:16 AM

Yeah, it's just getting ridiculous.
  • 0

#1696 Guest_ChaosSpawn

Guest_ChaosSpawn
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2008 - 02:36 AM

I think they keep makeing new games so they can attract new players from a younger age group where their first players have matured and dont like the game anymore they are makeing new pokemon and things to do so they attract a younger audiance
  • 0

#1697 Guest_embrid

Guest_embrid
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2008 - 03:37 AM

There are way too many pokemon now. There is no point in making so many pokemon and so many "legendary" pokemon. The basis 100 -200 pokemon is okay to stick with, but now there is like 300 almost 400.
  • 0

#1698 Guest_Ichobunni

Guest_Ichobunni
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2008 - 07:38 AM

Sure,pokemon IS getting a bit retarded with so many pokemon but I think after this region they should stop and instead make a game in which you can go through all the 4 worlds! That would be fun.
  • 0

#1699 Guest_doug3o3

Guest_doug3o3
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2008 - 09:14 AM

Well...it might be 'retarded' but adding Pokemon to the game is the only thing they can do to keep it fresh.
  • 0

#1700 Guest_thering

Guest_thering
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 07 April 2008 - 07:14 AM

Yeah, I definitely agree. They need to focus more on the storyline and plot rather than just adding random new pokemon who don't make sense...
  • 0