pokemon is a TIME CONSUMING GAME. this is its purpose. of course, i've caught 337 of the little bugs without cheating. so i gave up
Too many pokemon!!
Started by
Guest_SsJ4_GoHaN_UnLeAsHeD
, Mar 04 2006 03:02 AM
1870 replies to this topic
#1777
Guest_Kjatte
Guest_Kjatte
-
- Guest
Posted 16 July 2008 - 07:33 AM
When there is market, there is more and more versions.
#1778
Guest_riantr-walla
Guest_riantr-walla
-
- Guest
Posted 16 July 2008 - 05:05 PM
I hate new Pokemon 2!
#1779
Guest_Minirue
Guest_Minirue
-
- Guest
Posted 16 July 2008 - 05:21 PM
It's probably because people get bored of the same pokemon, so they make more and more.Pokemon is actually a very good selling game, and many game companies havetried to duplicate the games and effects, but not many have been as successful.The Pokemon company keeps trying to get the attention of people,thus the advance/improved versions.They try to make the graphics, gameplay, controls, and sounds vary so it's more funfor pokemon fans and people who are new to it.I think it's safe to say that even if you and a bunch of people stop being pokemon fans,it wouldn't bother the Pokemon company too much, since they have millions, maybe evenbillions of player out there... somewhere... 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
<<< OMG this guy is just too cute!~
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <<< OMG this guy is just too cute!~
#1780
Guest_Wrench0
Guest_Wrench0
-
- Guest
Posted 16 July 2008 - 07:13 PM
i remember the classics:yellow,blue, and red. Missingo, ash, prof oak, giving the water bottle to the guard to get into one city.that was fun and because of the missingo glitch, awesome. then silver and crystal, gold. more evolved slightly cooler looking pokemon, like umbreon, and the chance to go back to blue/red/yellow.it was actually simpler and possible to catch every pokemon.and then they came out with 400 pokemon, i think to make a different story and add longer replay value, or to increase action replay production .i still love the classics.
.i still love the classics.
#1781
Guest_Amrocks
Guest_Amrocks
-
- Guest
Posted 17 July 2008 - 12:05 AM
I agree that Crystal was the best, not only in the sense that you could go back to Kanto, but also in the sense that it was the first pokemon game to show the pokemon actually moving their body parts, but the flaw was that they didn't show them moving while in battle, just only when the opposition was sent out. Another thing they put in Crystal that they didn't put in Gold and Silver was that when you move into another route or city, it showed which city/route it was on the top-right corner (or maybe it was top-left, I don't remember the more specific specifics)i remember the classics:yellow,blue, and red. Missingo, ash, prof oak, giving the water bottle to the guard to get into one city.that was fun and because of the missingo glitch, awesome. then silver and crystal, gold. more evolved slightly cooler looking pokemon, like umbreon, and the chance to go back to blue/red/yellow.it was actually simpler and possible to catch every pokemon.and then they came out with 400 pokemon, i think to make a different story and add longer replay value, or to increase action replay production
.i still love the classics.
#1782
Guest_bluewafflez
Guest_bluewafflez
-
- Guest
Posted 17 July 2008 - 07:22 PM
I like the first 150 pokemon; they were original and had potential.Most of them only appeared a few times though.They really went overboard with the new pokemon and their names.
#1783
Guest_deadlymouser
Guest_deadlymouser
-
- Guest
Posted 18 July 2008 - 05:57 PM
I like the diversity, i dont mind a lot of pokemon.
#1784
Guest_ch0mper
Guest_ch0mper
-
- Guest
Posted 18 July 2008 - 07:36 PM
ya i was fine with the original 150but i guess they have nothing better to do than to think of wierd little pokemono well
#1785
Guest_mr_benio
Guest_mr_benio
-
- Guest
Posted 29 December 2008 - 08:29 PM
You are quite correct, sir. I think that theyhave made quite enough that will last the rest of their years. There is already too much, and if they made any more, the gameplay would be more like everyday chores, or a 9-to-5 job. Of course, I'm sure many people out there would like to make their own, custom Pokemon, as some people on YouTube have shown. Long ago, my brother even made up his own as well. But, their ideas will have to be forever kept in their minds, for there are more than enough Pokemon today. Thank you.
#1786
Guest_NERVPersonnel
Guest_NERVPersonnel
-
- Guest
Posted 29 December 2008 - 08:40 PM
They make a lot because they like stressing out their artists and they want us to get confused about their many Pokemon so that we may accidentally buy a second copy of their games.Acutally, I don't know. I guess it's a marketing strategy. But it sure works on little ten year olds. "Mommy, I want this new Pokemon game, it has a million new Pokemon! Dialga, Palkia, Turtwig, Chimchar, Staryly Bidoof . . ."The mother will be so exasperated she would have to buy the darn game.
#1787
Guest_krnchunga1
Guest_krnchunga1
-
- Guest
Posted 03 January 2009 - 04:54 AM
haha yeahh i use to like pokemon until diamond came out 
i just couldnt keep up with the newer pokemon
i just couldnt keep up with the newer pokemon
#1788
Guest_Swiftly
Guest_Swiftly
-
- Guest
Posted 03 January 2009 - 02:21 PM
I'm just like that, I knew everything about the pokemon from the first series. Then they released some more and I couldn't really be bothered to learn those new ones too. Not long after they released even more pokemon... it was around that time I stopped watching the show.
#1789
Guest_AxelIce
Guest_AxelIce
-
- Guest
Posted 03 January 2009 - 03:09 PM
Yeah they should stop adding so many pokemon .. it's getting boring this way ..
#1790
Guest_jamesacope
Guest_jamesacope
-
- Guest
Posted 22 January 2009 - 01:47 PM
there are too many pokemon - 493! + more to come!!
#1791
Guest_TMAce
Guest_TMAce
-
- Guest
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:28 PM
I think Pokemon needs something new to it- the Touch Screen was more of a DS thing than a Pokemon one, and it's used little in D+P. They should make some kind of new battle system, perhaps more like a beat-'em-up than the traditional turn-based system.
#1792
Guest_Killandone
Guest_Killandone
-
- Guest
Posted 07 February 2009 - 03:21 PM
Yeah well, probably kids now don't really use the older Pokémon (#1-150) I think, so that could be a reason why they keep on inventing new ones..But it's true, it's getting sick!
#1793
Guest_Shanidee
Guest_Shanidee
-
- Guest
Posted 08 February 2009 - 09:40 PM
I dont think ill ever be sick of pokemon to me it's a very fun game
#1794
Guest_Nairod
Guest_Nairod
-
- Guest
Posted 08 February 2009 - 09:43 PM
The monoteny of random battles makes me angry sometimes, but its a fun game.I prefer the original generation, it had the best story and gameplay imo.
#1795
Guest_GamesAreArt
Guest_GamesAreArt
-
- Guest
Posted 27 February 2009 - 04:22 AM
Don't you see, they're lengthening the games. they're making it take longer to "catch them all" thus taking months to complete the game.
#1796
Guest_nev_d2
Guest_nev_d2
-
- Guest
Posted 30 March 2009 - 02:11 AM
i agree i think there are too many now i understand that they only do it to keep the games different but they should put more effort into the stories and stop making up pokemon its getting impossible to get you head around them
#1797
Guest_xhentaix
Guest_xhentaix
-
- Guest
Posted 31 March 2009 - 09:08 PM
yeah, In this new season of pokemon the ideas are pretty bad lol.....they started getting poor when they invented regirock and all that, though some of the hoenn pokemon were cool e.g. salamence, kyogre, etc
#1798
Guest_Ward Williams
Guest_Ward Williams
-
- Guest
Posted 31 March 2009 - 11:31 PM
mostly because pokemon is a very popular RPGPOINTS were deducted for this post by GreenzPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#1799
Dahli
-
- Member
-
- 91 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:24 PM
Aren't there something like 500 of them now? Anyway, I don't mind that they keep making new ones. It keeps it interesting and forces you to stay on your toes. It would get boring if tehy stayed with just 150 all the time. Games that last are ones that keep evolving and changing.
It would get boring if tehy stayed with just 150 all the time. Games that last are ones that keep evolving and changing.
#1800
Guest_xtraspcial
Guest_xtraspcial
-
- Guest
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:21 AM
I tend to get bored of the ones they have, and making new ones is something they've always done, it adds new elements to the game. We wouldn't want the same old game with the only difference being the graphics now would we?
