Jump to content


pokemon or yugioh: which will make the most profit?


  • Please log in to reply
349 replies to this topic

#251 Guest_SoraRikuRoxas

Guest_SoraRikuRoxas
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 July 2007 - 09:48 PM

well, it is kinda a tie. pokemon gets money for the games, but in a survey, 5 times more people liked to buy and play the yugioh card game than the pokemon one...
  • 0

#252 Guest_Light23

Guest_Light23
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 July 2007 - 09:58 PM

Pokemon is popular with its games and shows for little kids...Yu-Gi-Oh is popular for its card games and stuff... But pre-teens liked the show in the past...Pokemon is most likely to make a large profit with games but im not so sure about yu-gi-ohMy big brother told me it this way"Why would someone watch a cartoon person play a card game to save a world? Better that you played it then watch this guy yell card knowledge and play down cards right? Come on, lets go play some basketball"
  • 0

#253 Guest_gaara333

Guest_gaara333
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 July 2007 - 10:06 PM

All right.Yugioh got a little boom for a whil and that was cool, but i believe that they have no chance of putting a dent in that of pokemon.Pokemon has been stacking up for so long and they are still running quite smoothly. not to mention that their boom was far greater than that of yugioh.it quite simple Pokemon wins, Hands down.
  • 0

#254 Guest_ihavekankles

Guest_ihavekankles
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 July 2007 - 10:06 PM

Is there really any question? It's pretty obvious that Pokemon is the leading endorser, especially as opposed to the Yu-Gi-Oh games. I actually hadn't realized there had been Yu-Gi-Oh games until around four months ago. The games are pretty pathetic, though. Very pathetic. This is almost like comparing chocolate to -- cheese. Yu-iOh is just there for the money, Pokemon is there for the entertainment, and I think that's what attracts buyers.

Without a doubt pokemon. Yu-gi-oh is just a card game. Pokemon is a really good video game.
  • 0

#255 Guest_Blondepotter

Guest_Blondepotter
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 July 2007 - 10:24 PM

Pokemon because1. Storyline2. On More Platforms3. Better Playthrough
  • 0

#256 Guest_pmaxwell

Guest_pmaxwell
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 July 2007 - 03:17 AM

pokemon they have the ass load of tv shows, games, toys, and cards what does yugioh have cards?
  • 0

#257 Guest_Narutodude 10

Guest_Narutodude 10
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 July 2007 - 04:16 AM

id gotta say pokemon. since they made the gx sereies i think it went down in profit. I HATE YUGIOH GX
  • 0

#258 Guest_namto

Guest_namto
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 July 2007 - 04:21 AM

pokemon yugioh is just a follower
  • 0

#259 Guest_chocobo23

Guest_chocobo23
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 July 2007 - 07:00 AM

pokemon because i think yu gi oh is losing profit
  • 0

#260 Guest_woodydaking

Guest_woodydaking
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 July 2007 - 07:33 AM

pokemon its still going and i havent seen much from yugiho in a while
  • 0

#261 Guest_Supersonicshadow

Guest_Supersonicshadow
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 July 2007 - 07:59 AM

I'm probably going with Pokemon because they have a lot of versions and even some teens don't get tired of it.
  • 0

#262 Guest_B74ckb1rd

Guest_B74ckb1rd
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 July 2007 - 05:01 PM

pokemons better by far, its got better gameplay better graphics, etc
  • 0

#263 Guest_bloodmagey

Guest_bloodmagey
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 July 2007 - 05:33 PM

well pokemon is a big attraction for kids so pokemon probably =D yugioh need for thinking so more for adults
  • 0

#264 Guest_Mr_AnOnYoMuS

Guest_Mr_AnOnYoMuS
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 July 2007 - 09:51 AM

I think that pokemon will make the most money in the long run because Yu-Gi-Oh is ashort lived thing; it'll die out soon and pokemon will still be on top
  • 0

#265 Guest_mojojojo3000

Guest_mojojojo3000
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 July 2007 - 08:46 PM

Pokemon it started it all and yugioh is just a rip off and not as cool athough i hate them both Pokemon games are better
  • 0

#266 Guest_Mushroom3691

Guest_Mushroom3691
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 July 2007 - 03:01 AM

Pokemon because it is more popular.
  • 0

#267 Guest_AnonymousUser

Guest_AnonymousUser
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 July 2007 - 03:02 AM

pokemon.yu gi oh sounds similar to you gay hoe.
  • 0

#268 Guest_Cheatman101

Guest_Cheatman101
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 July 2007 - 03:30 AM

Ya pokemon still has a lot of followers in the pokemon video games.
  • 0

#269 Guest_lazylocos

Guest_lazylocos
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 July 2007 - 03:55 AM

uhh...pokemon....yugioh is wierd to play
  • 0

#270 Guest_DeionJa

Guest_DeionJa
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 July 2007 - 04:00 AM

PKMN no doubt yu-gi-oh is old
  • 0

#271 Guest_Sero_Beam

Guest_Sero_Beam
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 August 2007 - 09:15 PM

pokemon for video games and pleasure....yu gi oh just eliminates pokemon form the training card list.
  • 0

#272 Guest_edi88

Guest_edi88
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 August 2007 - 02:18 AM

i think pokemon, because his older and better
  • 0

#273 Guest_XWiseOneX

Guest_XWiseOneX
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 August 2007 - 02:18 AM

Pokemon, all the way! Yu-gi-oh sucks on gaming...Pokemon has such an easy time with it
  • 0

#274 Guest_Le gros

Guest_Le gros
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 August 2007 - 02:22 AM

well it's too different kind of game... Pokemon is for RPG fan and the other 1 is kinda weird since ... it's only card... but in the episode you can see the monster it would be great if they could do so... but Pokemon has my vote
  • 0

#275 Guest_KA3K

Guest_KA3K
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 August 2007 - 02:55 AM

Pokemon because it's harder to get the absolute best team ever(that is, if you take the more advanced things that professional players should know about like EV's, IV's, natures, etc). Yu-Gi-Oh has a fun gameplay, but the password option takes away the challenge, and is easier to get the "best" deck. Plus, Yu-Gi-Oh doesn't feature actual animations of monsters fighting to entertain me.
  • 0