i dont think that the graphics alone make the game good. I think that various factors like background music, plot, and setting all contribute in makeing the game good.
Good Graphic = Good Game
Started by
Guest_znights
, Aug 25 2004 09:10 AM
446 replies to this topic
#227
Guest_Akif b
Guest_Akif b
-
- Guest
Posted 11 March 2006 - 09:35 PM
You also need good gameplay!!
#228
Guest_balling1
Guest_balling1
-
- Guest
Posted 11 March 2006 - 09:54 PM
even if the graphics are not all great, if the gameplay and storyline are good its a good game
#229
Guest_SkittlesRTasty
Guest_SkittlesRTasty
-
- Guest
Posted 11 March 2006 - 11:27 PM
I completely agree. I pretty much stick to nintendo, SNES and sometimes my gameboy. They're classics, and most of the games are just great ideas. Today's games are just so unoriginal and repetitive :/ graphices are nice and all, but they bore me.
#230
Guest_supernerdboy
Guest_supernerdboy
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:22 AM
Good Graphics always help but it's the gameplay and story that make it a game. My favorite games are all old ones. I just don't like 2d games that much though
#231
Guest_Repo_Man
Guest_Repo_Man
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:33 AM
Like most of the others have said, graphics does not make a game great. My favorite games are NES and SNES games. Sure, the graphics weren't much, and the only game that used polygon graphics was starfox, but it didn't matter. They were great games, that took a long time to play through. While today's games you can beat in a week or so. It's like we've traded quality games for quality graphics. The only exception being FF8. In it's day, it had decent graphics, *especially* the cut scenes, and it took me a while to run it into the ground. And another playstation classic is Final Fantasy Tactics. It had snes graphics, but it was an awesome game.
#232
Guest_teddy76
Guest_teddy76
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:38 AM
i agreei feel its kinda sad. nowadays, game producer only concer themselves with graphic in gaming. in the nintendo/sega days, the graphic was limited, but the gameplay and story was excellent. nowadays, they can practically draw and make polygon to be exacly alive, but the story/gameplay is soo bad that i always lost intrest halfway through the game.... even my younger bro already has a waning intrest in current games (ps2/xbox/ect) and for me, i turn to translation, or replay old classic games. what about you?
#233
Guest_Rom_Stol
Guest_Rom_Stol
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:42 AM
I don't think that good graphics makes better games. As a lot of good games don't rely on graphics (well what I consider good anyway).
#234
Guest_Hel
Guest_Hel
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:48 AM
Good graphics can contribute to create a better game. But graphics isn't the only thing that matters, there are music, sound, gameplay, and storyline(especially for rpgs).
#235
Guest_Twain
Guest_Twain
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:50 AM
I think it's necessary for a good game to have both good graphics and a great plot. Take for example the DBZ games. I'm a huge fan of the DBZ tenkaichi because I personally think the gameplay and graphics rock.But honestly, who wants to play a game with graphics that suck?
#236
Guest_LegacyCrono
Guest_LegacyCrono
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 04:10 PM
I don't think so. Graphics don't make the game. Chrono Trigger's graphics was incredible at these days, but Chrono Trigger is now famous because of its wonderful stroyline and interactivity in an virtual word with time... and so we can say of lotsa of games of the "new era"... look at Katamari, an famous game with very addictive fun, originality, extremely good japanese music... and Lego-type people at it, as crappy graphs too. But still, was famous at the Japan, and it has got an new game, the "We Love Katamari".This is what I think...SEE YA!!!
#237
Guest_fredgoku
Guest_fredgoku
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2006 - 04:12 PM
i agreei feel its kinda sad. nowadays, game producer only concer themselves with graphic in gaming. in the nintendo/sega days, the graphic was limited, but the gameplay and story was excellent. nowadays, they can practically draw and make polygon to be exacly alive, but the story/gameplay is soo bad that i always lost intrest halfway through the game.... even my younger bro already has a waning intrest in current games (ps2/xbox/ect) and for me, i turn to translation, or replay old classic games. what about you?
#238
Guest_i luv her
Guest_i luv her
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 01:26 AM
yea i agree most good games justr hyav good graphics but it doesnt really need to hav them
#240
Guest_System-M3
Guest_System-M3
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 03:26 AM
no not always but rly good graphics never hurt..
#241
Guest_trunks786
Guest_trunks786
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 03:28 AM
i think a game need a decent level of everything..a game could have really good graphics but the gameplay sucks...then the game will not be good..
#242
Guest_blahdin
Guest_blahdin
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 03:28 AM
Nothing beats the good ol' NES/SNES games... which is why they are continually ported...
#243
Guest_remedyz
Guest_remedyz
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 03:14 PM
i feel the same exact wayEdit: warned
#244
Guest_guruclef
Guest_guruclef
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 03:55 PM
the "old school" games are better, they have bad grafics but more great histories. For my are only a few exeptions: zelda ocarine of time, MGS3, god of war, ffVII
#245
Guest_Kewne
Guest_Kewne
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 04:11 PM
A game with great graphics doesn't have to mean that the game is great, but the graphics have a big part of the game. I don't like the graphics for Zelda Wind waker, but it goes nice with the gameplay and that is what makes the game great.
#246
Guest_DarkOniRoy
Guest_DarkOniRoy
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2006 - 05:39 PM
yeah, the gameplay and the game graphics are two totally different things. just because a game looks good doesn't mean that it will play good. if the controls are clunky and lag, the game is repetitious, and it takes aboout two to three hours to beat, what does it matter if the flames look real or not?
#247
Guest_nameuserinlog
Guest_nameuserinlog
-
- Guest
Posted 17 March 2006 - 09:01 AM
no look at the first final fantasy
#248
Guest_andrew_bedaure
Guest_andrew_bedaure
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2006 - 04:06 AM
graphics dont really show how good a game is. the gameplay decides that
#249
Guest_RnR4ever
Guest_RnR4ever
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2006 - 05:05 AM
^ Agree. A good game with bad graphics is tolerable. A bad game with graphics doesn't make you want to play.
#250
Guest_zargos
Guest_zargos
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2006 - 05:10 AM
a good trama = good gamethe graphics are only a secundary ... if the trama is bad the game is bad because it canīt atract the people...
