You really need an HDTV to really see the big leap in graphics. when i play my 360 and ps3 games on my standard TV they look like an Xbox 1 graphics but with more stuff hapenning on screen. No Wii game will ever look better than anything on 360/PS3 period. Its not posible.
PS3 Graphics - Something to cry over?
Started by
Guest_Dis-Organ-Ized
, Nov 17 2006 03:43 PM
164 replies to this topic
#77
Matrix
-
- Member
-
- 20 posts
Egg
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 24 January 2007 - 11:47 AM
The PS3 sucks really badly and its to expensive!!! POINTS were deducted for this post by PorumyIf you guys are disappointed then wait atleast one more year to see how ps3 games will really look.
#78
Guest_BANGA!!
Guest_BANGA!!
-
- Guest
Posted 24 January 2007 - 06:21 PM
ur just saying that cuz u cant afford it!!
#79
Guest_snake-killer
Guest_snake-killer
-
- Guest
Posted 24 January 2007 - 08:51 PM
i was annoyed with the fall of man graphics
#80
Guest_chbrevolution
Guest_chbrevolution
-
- Guest
Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:16 PM
it will get better in time
#81
Guest_Meehyn
Guest_Meehyn
-
- Guest
Posted 29 January 2007 - 03:18 PM
I cannot understand about the processesors and stuff about video games, so, I can't compare their capacitys.I wanna know if the difference between PS3 and 360 is that great, as the legends tells...I've seen some previews from 360 games and I found the graphics really great, likely of the PS3 games, but I know I can be wrong about that.
#82
Guest_Rufus66
Guest_Rufus66
-
- Guest
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:27 AM
the ps3 games that come out after 5 years time will be the great games
#83
Guest_Sifolion
Guest_Sifolion
-
- Guest
Posted 06 February 2007 - 09:22 AM
The PS3 has better specs and it's games should have better 'graphics' if they are made well for the PS3. Look at FF13 for instance.
#84
Guest_cynideralso
Guest_cynideralso
-
- Guest
Posted 07 February 2007 - 03:52 AM
I totally agree with Rufus66..since now still early stage...Sony or game developer still have a lot of space and time to improve or make use of ps3 spec..We should wait and see...
#85
Guest_jwalker
Guest_jwalker
-
- Guest
Posted 07 February 2007 - 04:41 AM
the launch games are no where near the capasity the ps3's graphics can producealso after i bought an HDMI cable and connected it to my ps3 it made world of a difference in the graphics
#86
Guest_raulzny
Guest_raulzny
-
- Guest
Posted 09 February 2007 - 04:26 AM
the graphics will be better wiht time...just like any console that has existed...
#87
Guest_canokira
Guest_canokira
-
- Guest
Posted 12 February 2007 - 04:50 AM
the console have the capablity of present graphic more than what the games on the market is doing. so the potential is something to look forward to...
#88
Guest_vivilakers
Guest_vivilakers
-
- Guest
Posted 19 February 2007 - 11:44 AM
Your kidding me right? Just look at the power of the ps3? It could hold a 2 disc DVD into one. You gotta be into ps3!
#89
Guest_raph2223
Guest_raph2223
-
- Guest
Posted 19 February 2007 - 12:25 PM
The graphics were d best so far but the wireless controller suks
#90
Guest_kizzerking
Guest_kizzerking
-
- Guest
Posted 19 February 2007 - 09:14 PM
ya i think that later on the games graphics will jump once they figure out how much that system can do
#91
Guest_integTypeR
Guest_integTypeR
-
- Guest
Posted 22 February 2007 - 07:29 AM
yea its kind of dissapointing. i remember back in e3 2005, the ps3 was bad donkey and the 360 was ****. but now, all games are either worse looking, or on par with 360 games
#92
Guest_lol_notreally
Guest_lol_notreally
-
- Guest
Posted 24 February 2007 - 12:04 AM
depends man. they're pretty good to me. the HD discs on big plasma or LCD screens look REALLY good. but if you just get the normal ones.. i dont think it'll be good. well, i dunno. i've only HD games. playing in HD. so it's pretty damn good. i havent seen just a regular.. thing..
#93
Guest_kiro13
Guest_kiro13
-
- Guest
Posted 24 February 2007 - 08:16 AM
I got a ps3 and I'll tell ya i think the graphics are damn sweet and the systems speed. I dont think x box will ever drag me in. <common metal gear!!!!>
#94
Guest_Stixy
Guest_Stixy
-
- Guest
Posted 25 February 2007 - 02:39 AM
sony have waisted their time with this, they've gone down the xbox root and we all know what happend. fact is the ps3 is too expensive for a console, ok it's a cheaper blueray drive but how many bluray discs does everyone have? sony didn't have anything original to pull out of the hat, the wireless controller that can sense movement is a quick rip from the wii, the online gaming has been improved and ben said to be similar to microsofts online gaming experience. and not every one has an HDTV, so even though it has far superior graphics to the other 2 consoles, whats the point if can't tell the difference on an ordinary TV. i don't hate the ps3, i just don't like the price i have to pay for what i'm getting, when i could buy the other 2 consoles and still have money spare
#95
Guest_jaylgran
Guest_jaylgran
-
- Guest
Posted 25 February 2007 - 03:42 AM
I think you're talking a bit too fast since they're not that many games out yet. You should wait after more games come out and then should you juge the PS3 because it IS the most powerful consol out there. Wait till games like ''Infraworld, Killzone, Heavenly Sword and The Getaway come out. I think we will think differently after playing those much anticipated games.T-Y
#96
Guest_Stixy
Guest_Stixy
-
- Guest
Posted 25 February 2007 - 02:47 PM
probably, but i still think it's still too much to pay for what it is and for offering nothing original. Sony have just copied everything that the other 2 consoles have brought out and tried to glue them together in one console, you can see that with the wireless remote, i don't quite get how your going to be able to control your charecters movements by waiving around a ps2 controller, since it still has both the joy pads. And like i said, your not going to even see the ps3s full potential on a normal tv, and since not alot of people have HDTVs it might even be a waist of time(?)
#97
Guest_Argothar
Guest_Argothar
-
- Guest
Posted 25 February 2007 - 04:42 PM
^ That's why I'm currently leaning toward an X360, the only reason I want to get a PS3 is so I can play my huge donkey collection of PS2 games on it, but I'll still have my ps2.
#98
Guest_radicalx
Guest_radicalx
-
- Guest
Posted 25 February 2007 - 04:49 PM
Have u even tried playing PS3 games at 1080PSome games play okay but other games suffer from frame rate issues like marvel :ultimate alliance.And also at high resolution u'll really notice the dullness of the textures
#99
Guest_something111
Guest_something111
-
- Guest
Posted 25 February 2007 - 06:08 PM
the ps3 isnt for the graphics its more for the potential of the games atm game makers are using about 5gigs of space and a double layered blue ray disk can hold 50 gigs
#100
Guest_xXToolXx
Guest_xXToolXx
-
- Guest
Posted 01 March 2007 - 03:36 AM
its interesting reading other people's posts.....i say the xbox 360 is a lot better than the ps3 right now in graphics (i say this even though i hate xbox) cause if you take a look at gears of war on the xbox and then look at a fps on the ps3 like resistance, gears of war beats it by a long shot. i agree with the others who have said it, after maybe a year, the ps3 is going to be A LOT better. the launch games for the ps3 are not showing the real potential of the system, so we gotta wait until better games come out
