Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

[OFFICIAL] ATI vs. Nvidia

Started by Guest_bandido , Mar 21 2005 10:13 PM

«
Prev

Next

Please log in to reply

280 replies to this topic

#226 Guest_smoove23

Guest

Offline

Posted 16 November 2007 - 11:51 PM

ATI! better res and cheap!!

0

Back to top

#227 Guest_Respectable

Guest

Offline

Posted 17 November 2007 - 05:46 AM

I used to be on the ATI bandwagon, but ever since I got my 8800, I think Nvidia may have got me for good.

0

Back to top

#228 Guest_runt9

Guest

Offline

Posted 17 November 2007 - 07:19 AM

nvidia is just plain better. they're more advanced and have more features, for the most part.

0

Back to top

#229 Guest_charizardflame

Guest

Offline

Posted 17 November 2007 - 03:10 PM

i had ATI but my current NVIDIA 7300 GT is also better than that old oneand the old one ws the LATEST ATi

0

Back to top

#230 Guest_Bozza

Guest

Offline

Posted 18 November 2007 - 01:28 PM

Go the Nvidia! - Im currently organising finance for a system with 2x 8800 Ultra's (the Superclocked ones ) i find that ATI has problems with user interface and the catalyst control centre is slow and sucky. then again the new nvidia tool panel for Win XP for "7 series" is prety lame too hopefuly this isnt a problem with the 8800's and DX10 / Vista and Ntune!I once had an MX440 - 64 meg running at double the frequency on halo 1 for pc that was... interesting i still have the burns on my knuckles! but hey, it worked alright once overclocked!

SUPER 1337 .. thats like 1.5GB+ anyways NVIDIA "FULLSTOP"

0

Back to top

#231 Guest_ezekiel777

Guest

Offline

Posted 18 November 2007 - 08:34 PM

dude Nvidia rules and ati sucks i have one in my pc and it really sucks BT i bought a laptop with Nvidia 8600n gt and i rockseven a special designed video card for ultimate output and ventilation never seen a ati with those preformance...i would know it.. NVIDIA

0

Back to top

#232 Guest_t4lrasha

Guest

Offline

Posted 21 November 2007 - 07:28 AM

nvidia is the way to go if you ask me.

0

Back to top

#233 Guest_Shrimp4074

Guest

Offline

Posted 21 November 2007 - 10:12 PM

NVIDIA. My new 8800 GT owns...

0

Back to top

#234 Guest_gothguy5969

Guest

Offline

Posted 22 November 2007 - 05:45 PM

Nvidia was meant for gaming... and i personally think ATI was meant for low budget computersI have a X700 Pro overclocked and it works well >.<

0

Back to top

#235 Guest_JustAGamer

Guest

Offline

Posted 22 November 2007 - 05:56 PM

I prefer ATI for the simple fact that it's more emulation and old game friendly then Nvidia.

0

Back to top

#236 Guest_ahjah

Guest

Offline

Posted 23 November 2007 - 01:23 PM

nvidia is good for gaming but is's up to you on which card would you like to use..

0

Back to top

#237 Guest_imakiller2

Guest

Offline

Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:20 PM

nvidia rules at the moment maybe one day ati will catch up

0

Back to top

#238 Guest_Kobyx

Guest

Offline

Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:47 PM

NVidia all the way. ATI might catchup as AMD is catching up with Intel.

0

Back to top

#239 DJ Night Force 9

Rockin' DJ

Administrator
1,738 posts

Offline

Reputation: 6

Neutral

Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:49 PM

Nvidia is definitely BETTER as their newest cards exceed ATI's in performance. I would have gotten a couple 8800XT's put in but I'd end up downgrading my mother board in order to fit the things. Nevertheless, my ATI 2900XTs have served me well thus far

. ATI has come a long way (*shudders at the thought of the ATI Rage 2c*)