You're really going to kick yourself one day, when you mature and realize how stupid it is to hold such hatred in your heart.Gay marriages are the worst thing that hit humanity. It is a complete sin against God.
should gays have the right to marry? (homosexual marriage thread)
Started by
Guest_pixelatenein
, Mar 05 2007 07:09 AM
697 replies to this topic
#476
NameDisplay
-
- Member
-
- 435 posts
Custom Made
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 December 2007 - 01:48 PM
#477
Guest_Bapetown
Guest_Bapetown
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 04:15 PM
But still we hate them. Can you explain why we hate people? And why the hater is so big? If everyone would just say ok and don't bother doing more damage than we already have done, it would be better to live.You're really going to kick yourself one day, when you mature and realize how stupid it is to hold such hatred in your heart.
#478
Guest_possessionisastateofmind
Guest_possessionisastateofmind
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 04:41 PM
Of course they should. Though using the word marriage only serves to create friction with religious groups so the policy of labelling them within the secular lexicon (ie. civil partnership and the like) is a good idea.
#479
Guest_ryan10877
Guest_ryan10877
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 04:42 PM
I believe this person makes a very good point. Homosexuals get married because they want to express their love for each other and to get the benefits of being married like being able to visit their partner when they're sick not to sin against God and hurt the world. They get married for the same reasons hedrosexuals do and that is why gay marriages should be allowed.If I want to get married so that I can have the right to visit my boyfriend in the hospital when he's sick, to be on his health insurance, etc, then I should be able to.
#480
NameDisplay
-
- Member
-
- 435 posts
Custom Made
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 December 2007 - 06:37 PM
People hate other people because of their own insecurities and an inability to deal with them. Instead of facing up to their own problems and dealing with their own inadequacies, it's easier to project their self-hatred onto other people.But still we hate them. Can you explain why we hate people? And why the hater is so big? If everyone would just say ok and don't bother doing more damage than we already have done, it would be better to live.
Edited by NameDisplay, 03 December 2007 - 06:38 PM.
#481
Guest_XfrozenflameX
Guest_XfrozenflameX
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 07:29 PM
Everone has the natural right to pursue happiness. Messing around with the instution of marriage does allow gay people to possibly be happy, but only by compromising the ideals of others. Why do they deserve more rights than those people whose ideas they just shot down? I'm against gay marriage simply because many people would become very destructive if this were to be legalized.
#482
Guest_Julius.Belmont
Guest_Julius.Belmont
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 07:32 PM
That's a tricky one. The idea of two people of the same gender bringing up adopted kids dosen't sound wrong to me, but whether it should be recognised in a christian ceremony..I wish it was a different word from 'marriage'..
#483
NameDisplay
-
- Member
-
- 435 posts
Custom Made
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:00 PM
What rights of others are being compromised by allowing gay people to marry? The right to be a bigot?And if you're against gay marriage because of the absurd notion that people would become very destructive, does that mean you would have been against outlawing slavery in America because people might have become destructive?Everone has the natural right to pursue happiness. Messing around with the instution of marriage does allow gay people to possibly be happy, but only by compromising the ideals of others. Why do they deserve more rights than those people whose ideas they just shot down? I'm against gay marriage simply because many people would become very destructive if this were to be legalized.
Edited by NameDisplay, 03 December 2007 - 08:01 PM.
#484
Guest_Spiritcove
Guest_Spiritcove
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:07 PM
Christian ceremony? Many marriages today have absolutely nothing to do with Christianity. In my country, all you have to do is call City Hall, apply for a marriage license and sign a document. Christian traditions need not be involved. Heck, if marriage is a 'Christian ceremony', why in the world are atheists allowed to marry? Not to mention all the other religions out there...That's a tricky one. The idea of two people of the same gender bringing up adopted kids dosen't sound wrong to me, but whether it should be recognised in a christian ceremony..I wish it was a different word from 'marriage'..
#485
Guest_Bapetown
Guest_Bapetown
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:42 PM
OK, yeah I agree with you. People are getting more and more violent and they hurt other people and run from their own problems instead of fighting back. Still, there is no end of this thread. There should be a poll.People hate other people because of their own insecurities and an inability to deal with them. Instead of facing up to their own problems and dealing with their own inadequacies, it's easier to project their self-hatred onto other people.
But think if they kids need someone, and if there is only homo people that want the child. What should we do then? You are speaking as if other people, example gays or blacks don't have the same rights in the government. That's all wrong.Dette er mitt forum ikke ta det fra meg nårstad hahaIt is okay fore me, but i don´t think they should get kids
Men allikevel så er jeg enig med deg, homser burde da gå gjennom en test eller to for å få lov.
#486
Guest_Julius.Belmont
Guest_Julius.Belmont
-
- Guest
Posted 03 December 2007 - 09:14 PM
I stand corrected *Ducks away from riposte/s like a little choo choo train chugging away across the countryside*The word 'marriage' tradionally has connotations with religion, and people I know in England would recognise an atheists 'marriage' as a 'civil union', if it was recognised by society and not by the church, whereas the word 'marriage' would be reserved for christian couples. But there's a whole wide world out there...Christian ceremony? Many marriages today have absolutely nothing to do with Christianity. In my country, all you have to do is call City Hall, apply for a marriage license and sign a document. Christian traditions need not be involved. Heck, if marriage is a 'Christian ceremony', why in the world are atheists allowed to marry? Not to mention all the other religions out there...
#487
M1551n9n0
-
- Member
-
- 875 posts
Elite Dragon
Reputation: 1
Neutral
Posted 03 December 2007 - 10:58 PM
I don't have a personal problem with gay marriage. If they're not committing a serious crime, I'd say legalize it.Gay people are just like everybody else, except their sexual preferences are different.
Artwork: Check it out Facebook fan page. -- deviantART profile
"If you wanna make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make a change"
#488
Guest_BillDoor
Guest_BillDoor
-
- Guest
Posted 04 December 2007 - 12:54 PM
Some people argue that gay marriage is an attack on the institution of marriage, and that if it is legalized, people won't take marriage seriously. This seems like an odd argument to me; it seems to suggest that the married happiness of straight people is not only the business of gays, but even their responsibility.Suppose that someone stated the following:"Eating cake at a wedding ceremony is a blasphemy against my faith. Anybody who eats cake at a wedding ceremony is behaving unnaturally. This behavior should be banned, because it cheapens the sanctity of marriage."Would this argument be accepted? What if people who were anti-cake were the majority?The counter, of course, is that cake has nothing to do with the definition of marriage, whereas the sexes of the participants does. But in that case, the anti-gay marriage argument comes down to a bit of circular logic: "It's not marriage because it isn't marriage."In short:A) The social consequences of gay marriages for straight people seem to depend entirely on how others react to gay marriage, and not any wrongdoing from the gays.B) If there are no other consequences, the argument from the definition of marriage is hollow.
Edited by BillDoor, 04 December 2007 - 12:54 PM.
#489
NameDisplay
-
- Member
-
- 435 posts
Custom Made
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 04 December 2007 - 02:57 PM
If marriage is so sacred, why not go after the heterosexual couples who are causing around half of all marriages to end in divorce? They're not exactly doing a good job of keeping a so-called sacred institution sacred, are they?People who say they're not against gay relationships but are against gay marriages are just trying to be bigots with a clear conscience. It's a way to hold on to their bigotry while still trying to convince themselves and others that they're somehow open minded.
#490
Guest_applecyder
Guest_applecyder
-
- Guest
Posted 04 December 2007 - 02:58 PM
definitely not. It's not natural. And more over, it's a sin
#491
NameDisplay
-
- Member
-
- 435 posts
Custom Made
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 04 December 2007 - 03:02 PM
Without resorting to religious dogma, can you explain why gay marriage is 'not natural' and 'a sin'?definitely not. It's not natural. And more over, it's a sin
#492
Guest_Dunkleheit
Guest_Dunkleheit
-
- Guest
Posted 04 December 2007 - 09:41 PM
Gay marriage is better than gay premarital sex. Whether it's the lesser of two evils, I'm undecided.
#493
Guest_melonfairy
Guest_melonfairy
-
- Guest
Posted 05 December 2007 - 03:20 PM
The world is homophobic. I am scared of that homophobic world, not because i'm gay, because that they're so spiteful > . >. Personaly, i don't give a damn about what a gay perosn does. They can do whatever they want, like have weddings and cakes and blah blah and i'll carry on with my hermit life (and dellusions).
Edited by melonfairy, 05 December 2007 - 03:30 PM.
#494
Guest_AmyTheFreak
Guest_AmyTheFreak
-
- Guest
Posted 05 December 2007 - 10:19 PM
Well it's obvious why it's not natural. But I don't see why it would be a sin. Love is the most important thing in the world. (apparently)But I'm all for it. I've got lots of gay friends (I'm a theatre major, go figure 
) and I want them to be happy as anyone.
) and I want them to be happy as anyone.
#495
Guest_Rayman!
Guest_Rayman!
-
- Guest
Posted 05 December 2007 - 10:39 PM
Absolutely... Homosexually is not wrong.. It's life and no-one can dissagree.. Homosexual people could say they think Hetrosexuality is wrong - Then the Hetrosexuals will disagree.. Like when two girls hug - They're just friends, of course.. When two BOYS hug (However).. They're ''Gay''..It's so sad.Back to point.. Yes they should be allowed. 
#496
Guest_kamiccolo
Guest_kamiccolo
-
- Guest
Posted 06 December 2007 - 12:32 AM
Theres lots of straight people that are unable to reproduce, should they not be able to get married?NO.gay people are pretty much screwed. they don't reproduce, they're useless.
#497
Guest_kingofthediamond
Guest_kingofthediamond
-
- Guest
Posted 06 December 2007 - 12:36 AM
those people are not healthy. not natural.oh and they have the intention of reproduction, they don't like it up the ass.Theres lots of straight people that are unable to reproduce, should they not be able to get married?
Edited by kingofthediamond, 06 December 2007 - 12:39 AM.
#498
Guest_Balore
Guest_Balore
-
- Guest
Posted 06 December 2007 - 12:57 AM
My, aren't you the pleasant one? Gay people may not reproduce, but they certainly have their uses. For one, they help control the population.And what's even better is that they annoy and frustrate people like you.That's great news to me.
#499
Guest_Firemblem7
Guest_Firemblem7
-
- Guest
Posted 06 December 2007 - 12:59 AM
yes gay marriages should b allowed only for lesbians and only if they show their bodies =)
#500
Guest_Julius.Belmont
Guest_Julius.Belmont
-
- Guest
Posted 06 December 2007 - 01:00 AM
Hmm, clever stuff, so should gay marriage be allowed? "No, because it ain't right and people do sex cos they want to make new babies, that's why straight people never argue for abortion, right? Because they're gay deep down as well, because they don't want to bring babies into the world, which is what truly straight people want, bringing babies into the world, because that's how people operate without them even realising, because we're all machines except some of us are dirty machines, -"That's the worst argument in the entire world, and I'm guessing your going to champion it to the end.those people are not healthy. not natural.oh and they have the intention of reproduction, they don't like it up the ass.
