Jump to content


Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?


  • Please log in to reply
437 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_game wiz

Guest_game wiz
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 12:55 AM

I believe we should have more than 493 pokemon but less than 700
  • 0

#2 Guest_fatbut

Guest_fatbut
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 01:00 AM

i thought teh original 150 were good enough but those douchebags had to make more didnt they
  • 0

#3 Guest_kaibacorpl

Guest_kaibacorpl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 01:02 AM

there should be at least 450 come on you gotta agree with me on that....
  • 0

#4 Guest_Super_Shot4006

Guest_Super_Shot4006
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 01:05 AM

I would say we need more so we could make the pokemon games a bit more challenging.And also if they add more pokemon,they would probably add more maps and stuff.
  • 0

#5 Guest_repubcanuck

Guest_repubcanuck
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 05:30 AM

Okay, lets look at a bad comparison. The digimon creativists definitely ran out of thinking fuel later on. I don't think pokemon should be like that either. SOme people might say "oh, but the new pokemon are still good", but no! 400 is enough already! I even thought the 3rd generation was pushing it a bit.
  • 0

#6 Guest_gizoid

Guest_gizoid
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 06:48 AM

I bet there are ones you never touch, like luvdisc.So, I think there are so many.It should be less.
  • 0

#7 Guest_tealbluewhite

Guest_tealbluewhite
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 07:18 AM

I believe we should have more than 386 pokemon but less than 700

more and more pokemon are always ok. i just want new ones. as long as there are new attacks and new types of pokemon you can never have too many.
  • 0

#8 Guest_*pip*

Guest_*pip*
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 08:50 AM

more and more pokemon are always ok. i just want new ones. as long as there are new attacks and new types of pokemon you can never have too many.

yeah you can never have too many.....
  • 0

#9 Guest_sandmann321

Guest_sandmann321
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 02:09 PM

heck no, as long as players can think up new ones i think the creators should be working to create new and varied types and pokemon characters
  • 0

#10 Guest_devik

Guest_devik
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 02:52 PM

I think that most of you are thinking the wrong way about this. If the question was: "Do you think 386 good cool usefull pokemonīs are enough?", I sure would answer :"No,there should be more"! But in 386 pokemon that exist I might like 40! So yes 386 are enough, no more useless,good for nothing pok's that have almost the same attacks and the same type! I donīt know who creates the new pokemons but the creator/s sure is/are all out of imagination!
  • 0

#11 Guest_Yaksha

Guest_Yaksha
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 03:02 PM

Defintely less. The original 150 where far more original. Afterwards, it's almost as if the designers where running out of ideas. Having less pokemon overall would mean each pokemon species could be better developed and better balanced.
  • 0

#12 Guest_saywhatsay1

Guest_saywhatsay1
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 March 2007 - 11:10 PM

for games its too many because it takes too long to get them all
  • 0

#13 Guest_Sky and Sea

Guest_Sky and Sea
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:11 AM

I liked the original 150 and if they could make pokemon like the then I would want more but they haven't been making the best pokemon lately.
  • 0

#14 Ish

Ish

    Mr. Wonderland

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 11,507 posts
Offline
Current mood: Amused
Reputation: 44
Good

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:12 AM

I liked the original 150 and if they could make pokemon like the then I would want more but they haven't been making the best pokemon lately.

what your saying is true but the original pokemon at least a few of them weren't that good like the egg pokemon and porygon
  • 0
In a wonderland full of dreams that turn into reality.
PSN: Verbalinter39

~I$h

#15 Guest_QB∞

Guest_QB∞
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:14 AM

I think they should have stopped at 386. The new ones are kinda stupid. =/
  • 0

#16 hookshot

hookshot

    Tiamat

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,301 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 14
Neutral

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:14 AM

The original 150 Pokemon were to many for me and now, they have like over 400. I like to stick with the old 150 Pokemon.
  • 0

#17 Guest_TheLox223

Guest_TheLox223
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:15 AM

386 is another. Now its to a point when they are making stupid looking pokemon. (D/P pokes)
  • 0

#18 Guest_game wiz

Guest_game wiz
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:19 AM

with the new sinnoh region there should be about 494 pokemon so far. thats a 108 addition to the 386 in existence
  • 0

#19 Guest_Inuyasha20jl

Guest_Inuyasha20jl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:20 AM

i though there should be at least 600 no less :P------------------------------------------------------mind control attack!!XD\ /)(@.@)(> <)U Uok now rest:( \(\( ='·')( (")(")
  • 0

#20 Guest_zxzx4zxzx

Guest_zxzx4zxzx
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 03:03 AM

the new game and the new chapter of the anime now has more pokemon. i think the number or pokemon will reach 600. i guess more pokemon would be nice, because more types/moves will be made, thus more game. but don't make too much pokemon, everyone will get mixed up and forgot the 3 original: bulbasaur, squirtle and charizard. i mean chameleon.
  • 0

#21 Guest_G.G no-re

Guest_G.G no-re
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 10 March 2007 - 03:12 AM

150 was the perfect numba now theres too mny and heappps too many to try n remba
  • 0

#22 faiz_206

faiz_206

    Dragon

  • Active Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 605 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:27 PM

well, i think the more pokemon to be collected, the better. i just hope they can do species as good as the first genrations.
  • 0
Posted Image

#23 Guest_ChocoMp3

Guest_ChocoMp3
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:44 PM

not the 350 are not that enough but too much is quite a bad thing to do but now we have reach the mark of 400 pokemon with pokemon D\P
  • 0

#24 Guest_shadowskill

Guest_shadowskill
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:47 PM

while its fun to see you all think that you need more...i happen to agree for a reason. the pokemon in all regions like jhoto,kanto those two regions compliment each other...especially in ..i think it was crystal...or silver and gold and now we have the lonely hoenn...of course its gonna need another region for another crossover like it did with the johto and kanto regions. and to do this you would need different pokemonso obviously the creators would need to pull them out of somewhere. there is a problem though....with all the new pokemon the ideas are plentiful...HOWEVER the designs are not, they can run out the ideas cannot...i hope you can see where i am going with this.
  • 0

#25 Guest_jeudegreune

Guest_jeudegreune
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:08 PM

I don't mind new ones as long as they don't look like the old ones and have new attacks.
  • 0