Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?
#1
Guest_game wiz
Posted 09 March 2007 - 12:55 AM
#2
Guest_fatbut
Posted 09 March 2007 - 01:00 AM
#3
Guest_kaibacorpl
Posted 09 March 2007 - 01:02 AM
#4
Guest_Super_Shot4006
Posted 09 March 2007 - 01:05 AM
#5
Guest_repubcanuck
Posted 09 March 2007 - 05:30 AM
#6
Guest_gizoid
Posted 09 March 2007 - 06:48 AM
#7
Guest_tealbluewhite
Posted 09 March 2007 - 07:18 AM
more and more pokemon are always ok. i just want new ones. as long as there are new attacks and new types of pokemon you can never have too many.I believe we should have more than 386 pokemon but less than 700
#8
Guest_*pip*
Posted 09 March 2007 - 08:50 AM
yeah you can never have too many.....more and more pokemon are always ok. i just want new ones. as long as there are new attacks and new types of pokemon you can never have too many.
#9
Guest_sandmann321
Posted 09 March 2007 - 02:09 PM
#10
Guest_devik
Posted 09 March 2007 - 02:52 PM
#11
Guest_Yaksha
Posted 09 March 2007 - 03:02 PM
#12
Guest_saywhatsay1
Posted 09 March 2007 - 11:10 PM
#13
Guest_Sky and Sea
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:11 AM
#14
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:12 AM
what your saying is true but the original pokemon at least a few of them weren't that good like the egg pokemon and porygonI liked the original 150 and if they could make pokemon like the then I would want more but they haven't been making the best pokemon lately.
PSN: Verbalinter39
~I$h
#15
Guest_QB∞
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:14 AM
#16
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:14 AM
#17
Guest_TheLox223
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:15 AM
#18
Guest_game wiz
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:19 AM
#19
Guest_Inuyasha20jl
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:20 AM
#20
Guest_zxzx4zxzx
Posted 10 March 2007 - 03:03 AM
#21
Guest_G.G no-re
Posted 10 March 2007 - 03:12 AM
#22
Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:27 PM
#23
Guest_ChocoMp3
Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:44 PM
#24
Guest_shadowskill
Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:47 PM
#25
Guest_jeudegreune
Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:08 PM









