they should have stopped after round 2. silver/gold were the furthest the entire thing should have gone. i dont care how many more they make because the series is already way overused /nod
Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?
Started by
Guest_game wiz
, Mar 09 2007 12:55 AM
437 replies to this topic
#327
Guest_neo_mat
Guest_neo_mat
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:00 PM
new one lack originality:( i like the old ones better
#328
Guest_shscshock
Guest_shscshock
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:01 PM
i think they have to be 386 NOT EVOLVED pokemon (but of course that they will evolve)
#329
WinterNut
-
- Active Member
-
- 563 posts
Dragon
Reputation: 2
Neutral
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:02 PM
They need to make the game bigger. And better.Like the way they did when they made the GSC series.
#330
Guest_StefNijland
Guest_StefNijland
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:05 PM
I guess it's more than enough.With over the 386, you'll get ridicilous ugly Pokemon, which we already have.
#331
Guest_Erich990
Guest_Erich990
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:06 PM
My opinion on this is that they should have focused less on making a ton of new pokemon and more on making new maps/ more things to do in the games. Also, there are just TOO many pokemon, 400 is already pushing it no more please. I wouldn't mind if the existing pokemon got new moves though, then that'll make it better.
#332
Guest_done with ...
Guest_done with ...
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:12 PM
there are too many now. Now, it takes i bit too long to catch them all. Plus, the originality and the spark of original pokemon is kind of lacking in the new ones. Wish some of the old pokemons came back (return blastoise).
#333
Guest_loveapples
Guest_loveapples
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:00 PM
386 is a lot already. i thought they wouldve stopped at 251... i guess they ran out of ideas... and need new crappy pokemon. lol
#334
Guest_piclam
Guest_piclam
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:01 PM
I thinks that 650 it's ok
#335
Guest_da chinc
Guest_da chinc
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:02 PM
i kinda liked the original 150no one realy cares about the new pokemon.....they just wanna see the new moves, cities, and quests
#336
Guest_piclam
Guest_piclam
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:02 PM
but they will be too strange
#337
Guest_emolicious_Payton42
Guest_emolicious_Payton42
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:05 PM
personally i dont think that they shoyuld have made so manybut it makes the games longer if u play to try and get every pokemoni liked the original 150 pokemon the best tho. B)
#338
Guest_JJ54321
Guest_JJ54321
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:08 PM
no more new pokemon i want the game to be longer and harder an to not just stop at lvl.100 i mean come on connect all the games already an make it one giant game make the levels go higer make more moves and make the gym leaders and trainers harder i mean mix up the teams of the enemies not all one type
#339
Guest_starw0lf
Guest_starw0lf
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:11 PM
I think we should have less pokemon, today there is too many stupid looking ones. Atleast they used to look like animals, now some of them look like aliens 
.
.
#340
Guest_javier cameron
Guest_javier cameron
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:17 PM
i want them to make way more pokemon even though the first 150 where pretty good
#341
Guest_scottyjasp
Guest_scottyjasp
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2007 - 11:21 PM
100-200 is just enough to last you a while, and without you getting annoyed.also, I hate nintendo events because only certain people have access to it.
#342
Guest_darkness989
Guest_darkness989
-
- Guest
Posted 20 June 2007 - 12:36 AM
386 Pokemon is enough to me memorizing all those Pokemon are a pain besides the original 150 were good enough
#343
Guest_jevus
Guest_jevus
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:15 AM
yea i think 386 is enough cause i cant keep up with all the pokemon
#344
Guest_Ruodo
Guest_Ruodo
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:18 AM
I think they should keep making more and more. I just love seeing how crazy each new batch looks compared to the last. They get more weird looking each time.
#345
Guest_JDAHURRACANE
Guest_JDAHURRACANE
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:19 AM
no i think there should be a lot more pokemon.
#346
Guest_Franksta
Guest_Franksta
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:25 AM
I think they should go for quality instead of quantity. They filled the adding-abou-100-every-time quota, but a lot of the new ones are kinda pointless. I think about 30 quality, well balanced pokemon every time is pretty good.
#347
Guest_fire seeker
Guest_fire seeker
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:29 AM
i think there should be at least 500 of them cause then it would so that every pokemon could evolve at least 3 times cause it use to suck when the could not evolve and they use to be at lvl 100\
#348
destroyer_X
-
- Active Member
-
- 42 posts
Egg
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 21 June 2007 - 07:51 AM
Yeah, too much pokemon would take a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time to clock the game.But still, catching pokemon is kinda fun, especially trying to catch rare ones
#349
DrkShd
-
- Active Member
-
- 108 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 21 June 2007 - 08:01 AM
the more the merry
#350
lunarknight42
-
- Active Member
-
- 595 posts
Dragon
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 21 June 2007 - 08:34 AM
I think more pokemon is more better. It is never enough to have more pokemon.
