Jump to content


Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?


  • Please log in to reply
437 replies to this topic

#376 Guest_silverfoxy

Guest_silverfoxy
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 June 2007 - 11:36 PM

Well. It's hard to say if there should be more really!Nintendo need to think up some fresher ideas for the Pokémon series. It's fast getting tedious, but it is still good...I can't believe I'm saying that, but it IS still decent. More PKMN is going to be a bit of a pain, because at the end of the day, many will be identical in stats, just a different appearance.
  • 0

#377 Guest_PUUNS#@4

Guest_PUUNS#@4
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 June 2007 - 11:56 PM

i think that 450 is far too mush, pokemon was cool with 150 but with all these hybrid/look-alike pokemon things have gotten worse :D
  • 0

#378 Guest_Noges

Guest_Noges
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 01:21 AM

I liked the 150 original
  • 0

#379 Guest_Regia X

Guest_Regia X
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 01:25 AM

I think 493 might be a few too many.I'd say 300 should of been the limit.But even with 150 it was still annoying since you had to trade all the pokemon.
  • 0

#380 Guest_hawka

Guest_hawka
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 01:49 AM

i think there should be more but not too many more definatly under 700.
  • 0

#381 Guest_RobbieB

Guest_RobbieB
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 01:57 AM

400 is getting rediculous!! They look lame now...
  • 0

#382 Ish

Ish

    Mr. Wonderland

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 11,507 posts
Offline
Current mood: Amused
Reputation: 44
Good

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:01 AM

it doesn't really matter how much pokemon they create though as long as the pokemon aren't made up animals like a table pokemon or a house pokemon something like that
  • 0
In a wonderland full of dreams that turn into reality.
PSN: Verbalinter39

~I$h

#383 Guest_QB∞

Guest_QB∞
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:23 AM

Would creating a 'God' Pokemon count?I'm being serious.
  • 0

#384 Guest_maaniko

Guest_maaniko
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:31 AM

i think that's more than enough! But I don't really mind if there are like 700, even 1000!
  • 0

#385 Guest_that guy ^^

Guest_that guy ^^
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:31 AM

that's so true. the original 150 were the best.
  • 0

#386 Guest_buzz3

Guest_buzz3
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:39 AM

no i rekon they should only bring out three new pokemon every series as the starting pokemon and a god pokemon for every game thats it
  • 0

#387 Guest_32703

Guest_32703
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:40 AM

i dont think so POINTS were deducted for this post by HadelPlease have a look at the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#388 Guest_Derander

Guest_Derander
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:46 AM

I wish they would add more MOVES instead of more pokemon, it seems like every pokemon I find is identical.. Tackle and growl. :-)
  • 0

#389 Guest_ZhouLen

Guest_ZhouLen
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:10 AM

i wish they would make a pokemon that was more like a traditional RPG like the Final fantasy games.I find my self only needing to use one move with each pokemon and it makes the game boring
  • 0

#390 Guest_griever13698

Guest_griever13698
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:35 AM

I think 493 pokemon is far too many. 250 was a good number. Still hard to get them all but it was possible without a couple of years of work.I agree. They should make it more like an ordinary RPG so that it's not only the pokemon that matters but the moves. I also think you should be able to have more than 4 moves.
  • 0

#391 Guest_guido_union6

Guest_guido_union6
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 05:54 AM

i think that its ok while it doesnt get repetitive because they are making very similar pokemons than the ones wich were already maden...so for me its enough
  • 0

#392 Guest_Apolus20

Guest_Apolus20
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 06:09 AM

I dont think the 493 pokemon are enough, because there is a lot of creatures(aliens+), object and animals they can still make.I would love to see a braquiosaurio as a pokemon (it will be really nice) or one of those strange fish on the bottom of the sea...I mean there is plenty they can make (the day they make the pencil pokemon, that they it will be enough)
  • 0

#393 Guest_dragon_rom

Guest_dragon_rom
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 07:04 AM

i think increasing the amount is fine it makes it more of a challange in my opion
  • 0

#394 Guest_liquid_snake882002

Guest_liquid_snake882002
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 03:00 PM

they should have stopped at 250, but I do think Tyranitar is pretty cool lol
  • 0

#395 Guest_neji113

Guest_neji113
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 03:03 PM

if you think about it this way if you get more pokemon you get more maps and islands which could affect the gampley (travelling between islands) but there is also the point that some would be useless. so i think there should but to a certain limit
  • 0

#396 Guest_noazure

Guest_noazure
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 03:07 PM

just give the pokemons up....why dont they give a new gameplay, new rules or new stuff...*bored out* digimon was better for now i think
  • 0

#397 Guest_Formles§nake

Guest_Formles§nake
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:02 PM

I think we need more like 800 lol
  • 0

#398 Guest_Martin518

Guest_Martin518
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:33 PM

I hated the idea of making new and unknown pokemon. The originals were better
  • 0

#399 Guest_Supreme Ruler

Guest_Supreme Ruler
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:47 PM

I think they should've stopped at 250 pokemon because all the later ones look bad.
  • 0

#400 Guest_mrx619

Guest_mrx619
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:47 PM

i would have expected more in diamond and pearl, they only added about 110
  • 0