Jump to content


Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?


  • Please log in to reply
437 replies to this topic

#26 Guest_whitehole000

Guest_whitehole000
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:13 PM

Of course I think 386 pokemon are enough, in fact I think that 200 are enough. Back when there were much less, I could remember all of the pokemon, their abilities, etc. But now I can't keep track at all!
  • 0

#27 Guest_anomys

Guest_anomys
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:38 PM

I hope there are more pokémons, because than a new game comes out and I like pokémon games very much. I hope it very much for the pokémon company. Nintendo and pokémon games rule.
  • 0

#28 Guest_`ty

Guest_`ty
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:40 PM

251 was enough for me.
  • 0

#29 Guest_kratos auron

Guest_kratos auron
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 09:37 PM

*sigh*Poke'mon was only good in the very first series. The original 150 were the best. It should have never stretched past that. After the first series, everything got unoriginal. So, my thoughts are, they should have only made the first season and Mew vs. Mewtwo. Everything after that just was... extremly lame.
  • 0

#30 Guest_m6gt2k6

Guest_m6gt2k6
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 09:58 PM

i think there should be around 500 pokemon
  • 0

#31 Guest_GVIN81

Guest_GVIN81
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 March 2007 - 10:06 PM

i agree with that the 150 that they started out with are fine, i see no reason to go over 300, just seems silly to me to have soo meny that are sub standared to others and what the point then??
  • 0

#32 The phantom of the opera

The phantom of the opera

    Hatchling

  • Active Member
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 2
Neutral

Posted 23 March 2007 - 10:24 PM

what your saying is true but the original pokemon at least a few of them weren't that good like the egg pokemon and porygon

Egg pokémon? you mean eggsecutor? (excouse the bad spelling) and how dare you be mean to porygon *cuddle porygon* he's soo cute and cool you meanie :yawn:
  • 0
I am your angel of music

Your obedient servant O.G

#33 Guest_sparkingwonders

Guest_sparkingwonders
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 March 2007 - 10:40 PM

It is rather enuff, but either way, thr are still mor being made as i post this
  • 0

#34 Guest_ssj4tempester

Guest_ssj4tempester
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 March 2007 - 10:42 PM

There are 493 now or something stupid like that aren't there?That IS too many...
  • 0

#35 Guest_KurosakiSan

Guest_KurosakiSan
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 March 2007 - 10:42 PM

More than 386 but no higher than 500.. It's already hard enough to catch 386 >_>;
  • 0

#36 Guest_ssj4tempester

Guest_ssj4tempester
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 24 March 2007 - 11:40 PM

They think that they are making the games last longer but if they go on for too long or get too hard then people won't buy them anymore.
  • 0

#37 Guest_yonghyun123100

Guest_yonghyun123100
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 02:27 AM

That's enough because it would be confusing if there were more.
  • 0

#38 Guest_n3o17

Guest_n3o17
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 02:40 AM

the new one's look ghetto as sh**
  • 0

#39 Guest_jet magnum

Guest_jet magnum
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 02:54 AM

I think what they need to do is, if they are going to add more pokemon, it should be to equal out the ones that are weak. For instance I might really like omastar, but it cant really compete with a class 3 pokemon like machamp. Theres too much difference in strength there and I would get pwned.
  • 0

#40 Guest_Dragon_Salamence

Guest_Dragon_Salamence
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 02:56 AM

i think that their should of been 420 pokemon, the more the better, expecially the cute ones
  • 0

#41 Guest_Shadow__Hedgehog

Guest_Shadow__Hedgehog
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 03:02 AM

I think they could add a few more like a total of 400 maybe. But no more than that.
  • 0

#42 Guest_Shuyin_zer0

Guest_Shuyin_zer0
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 03:03 AM

I think that 150 was MOOOORE than enough!!!
  • 0

#43 Guest_giles8307

Guest_giles8307
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 05:28 AM

i think there are plenty to keep u going 4 ages, there are alot of pokemon that arent even being used. 386 is enough i think
  • 0

#44 Guest_Dis Nikka Poco Loco

Guest_Dis Nikka Poco Loco
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 05:31 AM

as i sed b4the 3rd generation got pokemon that look like they on PCPsee the 2nd generation was iight but they aint gonna stop pplbut 4 real tho out of the 3rd generation i saw like 4 or 5 that were decenti mean c'mon 1 of them is jus a fruukrukin hed wit 2 dots for eyes wtf is thatn one of them looks like a dog wit a blade for an ear........OD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!but hey they can come up wit worse lol
  • 0

#45 Guest_firedragon icetunder

Guest_firedragon icetunder
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 March 2007 - 05:49 AM

didn't they add new pokemon? and i think more because u could have cooler pokemon. :drool:
  • 0

#46 38542788

38542788

    Winged Serpent

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 2
Neutral

Posted 25 March 2007 - 05:52 AM

I don't really care about the number, but they really should make the game harder. I just play by leveling up one pokemon and using it till the end of the game...it's weird how this strategy actually works considering the limit of 4 attacks.It would be a lot better if made it so that damage is greatly reduced but scaled up exponentially based on level (a lvl50 against a lvl50 deals 100% damage, lvl50 against lvl25 deals something like 200% with the base damage greatly lowered, so lower level pokemon that would lose under current circumstances would still lose, but higher level fights will last a lot longer).There are always a couple of interesting new pokemon each generation but, the game play has still been basically the same since red and blue, the game needs to get a lot harder.
  • 0

#47 Guest_QB∞

Guest_QB∞
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 March 2007 - 07:54 AM

The way I see it, 386 is more than enough, unless they can make some decent looking ones.
  • 0

#48 Guest_Skill1414

Guest_Skill1414
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 March 2007 - 08:18 AM

I would prefer more but not too many :P
  • 0

#49 ngocanh15121991

ngocanh15121991

    Elite Dragon

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 801 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 26 March 2007 - 11:23 AM

I think it will be never enough Pokemon! They would be developed as much as they can!!!
  • 0

Posted Image


#50 Guest_Sivagames

Guest_Sivagames
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 March 2007 - 02:58 PM

No matter how many are thereIs it there are not is the matterIf there are more pokemons you can select your fav pokemon very easilyBut it is very hard to remember all the names
  • 0