Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?
#76
Guest_mdessler
Posted 05 April 2007 - 05:17 PM
#77
Guest_veleno007
Posted 05 April 2007 - 05:48 PM
#78
Guest_HAPPYPERSON
Posted 05 April 2007 - 05:56 PM
#79
Posted 05 April 2007 - 06:46 PM
#80
Guest_Novadragon
Posted 05 April 2007 - 07:33 PM
#81
Guest_soarj1
Posted 05 April 2007 - 08:35 PM
#82
Guest_megamon_97
Posted 05 April 2007 - 08:44 PM
#83
Guest_Eyeshield 21
Posted 05 April 2007 - 08:49 PM
#84
Posted 12 April 2007 - 12:15 AM
#85
Guest_minolta
Posted 01 June 2007 - 11:39 AM
#86
Guest_gamerlockheart
Posted 01 June 2007 - 02:44 PM
#87
Guest_Swifty-chan
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:36 PM
#88
Guest_reoguy888
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:40 PM
#89
Guest_calibur_0690
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:42 PM
#90
Guest_latimaster
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:43 PM
#91
Guest_davidmak
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:55 PM
#92
Guest_Machewman
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:02 PM
#93
Guest_liao.0317
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:14 PM
#94
Guest_Fodzilla24
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:23 PM
#95
Guest_metallicslammerz
Posted 01 June 2007 - 10:03 PM
#96
Guest_makkk
Posted 01 June 2007 - 10:51 PM
#97
Guest_Kiowa
Posted 01 June 2007 - 11:48 PM
exactly.....i am 13 ive been playing pokemon for 10 years....i used to know the pokemon by cries....dp is out now...i dunt know even 10......they should make useful pokemon and not 100 of usless ones....like tentacool psyduck......dunsparce.....and others.....i think they should stop making pokemon inmediatley.they are runing out of inspiration.i mean "ploygon z", what the heck?
#98
Guest_lifsuks
Posted 01 June 2007 - 11:51 PM
#99
Guest_SasukeX57
Posted 01 June 2007 - 11:56 PM
#100
Posted 02 June 2007 - 01:06 AM








