there should be more pokemon
Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?
Started by
Guest_game wiz
, Mar 09 2007 12:55 AM
437 replies to this topic
#102
Guest_jamesytl
Guest_jamesytl
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:22 AM
maybe they shud stop creating pokemon game now..it make me felt boring oredy..Pokemon Red Dungeon Rescue Team is a dissapointedment...The new pokemon are not intereting anymore....maybe they shud wait for abt 1 or 2 years only create some pokemon game...btw...386 pokemon is too much oredy....coz inside got a lot useless brat....just like makk say...polygon z.....wat is this?
#103
Guest_sliverwing
Guest_sliverwing
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:26 AM
I feel 1,000 is a good number.The more pokemon the better!But, the 10th sesons pokemon are kinda ugly. xDDD
#104
Guest_tomthantlas
Guest_tomthantlas
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:38 AM
they are running out of ideas, they should stop already
#105
Guest_scorpio86
Guest_scorpio86
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:41 AM
Obviously the more the better...maybe some new ones but not too much banking on evolved forms from those that we know already...if the amount reaches more than 700 then it's better if they provide a guide book that features each and every pokemon...which means it will have to be a thick book...
#106
Guest_MarcoKin
Guest_MarcoKin
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:43 AM
add more pokemon will be more funny^^
Edited by MarcoKin, 02 June 2007 - 03:43 AM.
#107
Guest_SKyLine R32
Guest_SKyLine R32
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 01:47 PM
If more Pokemon are added then less people will be attracted to the series.
#108
Guest_Gerz
Guest_Gerz
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 01:50 PM
i lost count of pokemon at 128 or somthing they even had a song for each 128 of them 
#109
Guest_•●•((«°ღ°к
Guest_•●•((«°ღ°к
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 01:54 PM
more pokemon new moves chalenges more excitement y stop theremore legendarys even more excitment nxt thy might jus tske ovr the world hu knws
#110
Guest_venkat
Guest_venkat
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 01:57 PM
well i think they are enough. like pokemon is a long game and if u addtoo many pokemons lit will be harder forthe creaters and you to beat. i like fun and simple games so i think it is enough
#111
Guest_AkiFennec
Guest_AkiFennec
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 02:23 PM
they should stop where there at they are already running out of ideas
#112
Guest_maron reyes
Guest_maron reyes
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 02:30 PM
386 new pokemons just means that more choices for trainers, but i still find myself using most of the original 150.. yeah, in that sense maybe the designers should cut themselves some slack and start focusing on making other new developments. i mean, a new pokemon version shouldn't just throw you a bunch of haphazard substandard pokemons, right? one new pokemon (that is impressively cool and useful) per version might just be more effective than 150 new prosaic and stupid-looking ones
#113
Guest_jonastome
Guest_jonastome
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 02:42 PM
add more challenge and fun with eh... 1000.
#114
Guest_DonDonkey
Guest_DonDonkey
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 02:48 PM
Hi,it would be interesting if there were more pokemons , because then , the battles between friends .. or general players would be more interesting. More pokemons , more tactical ways .. and stuff like that 
.. hope you know what I mean .. In addition the new generation of pokemon players should get, their own pokemons Greetz My English is bad
.. hope you know what I mean .. In addition the new generation of pokemon players should get, their own pokemons Greetz My English is bad
#115
Guest_uzrg
Guest_uzrg
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:01 PM
As long as they can keep good pokemon coming, and not silly pokemon, we can have has much has we want
#116
Guest_Searchman SP
Guest_Searchman SP
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:24 PM
Too bad in the later games the original 150 able to be captured without any kind of different method are getting smaller and smaller. Sure, there are 386, but how many are they actually giving us per game?
#117
Guest_james0317
Guest_james0317
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:30 PM
actually not enough,to me,because more pokemon have more fun
#118
Guest_nit3r0ad
Guest_nit3r0ad
-
- Guest
Posted 02 June 2007 - 03:32 PM
they should have more pokemon but not creating more weird looking pokemon...but cool pokemon
#119
Guest_twkim
Guest_twkim
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 04:09 AM
S long s they don't rely on the previous ones n develop pre-evolution or more advance evolved forms...500-600 should be enouigh or else they'll have to provide a giudebook for each and every pokemon to the players...
#120
Guest_imperialdarknes
Guest_imperialdarknes
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 04:16 AM
i think they should of just stopped at 251, its starting to get confusing
#121
Guest_cap'n pimp
Guest_cap'n pimp
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 04:22 AM
well seeing how pokemon came to the us when i was seven and now i'm about to be 18, i think it's time for at least the anime series to be over cuz it's getting ridiculous...the original catchphrase is "gotta catch em all" but can't be used cuz when u think u get close, lo behold here's another installment with a hundred more pokemon. personally i quit after silver and gold version lol
#122
Guest_mikechen
Guest_mikechen
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 04:23 AM
386 pokemon is definitely enough. nobody can manage to know all of them.
#123
Guest_Sethness
Guest_Sethness
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 04:27 AM
I dont even care...as long as the games keep staying good. But agreed to the first 150..they were the best.
#124
Guest_crazykid01
Guest_crazykid01
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 06:30 AM
if you get them all should you be considered to have no life?
#125
Guest_rijurekh
Guest_rijurekh
-
- Guest
Posted 04 June 2007 - 06:45 AM
500 pokemon are enough POINTS were deducted for this post by HadelPlease have a look at the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.I believe we should have more than 386 pokemon but less than 700
