Jump to content


Do you think 493 pokemon are enough?


  • Please log in to reply
437 replies to this topic

#151 Guest_maxykorn

Guest_maxykorn
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2007 - 09:37 AM

Yhea the new ones are like not nearly as cool as the fist lot.my pesonal fav is still gengar :blink:
  • 0

#152 Guest_Vasis

Guest_Vasis
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2007 - 09:43 AM

Yes to an extentPOINTS were deducted for this post by HadelPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#153 Guest_buccy

Guest_buccy
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:06 PM

More, more, more. Can never have enough pokemon.
  • 0

#154 Guest_Raymond

Guest_Raymond
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:37 PM

i think that catching 386 pokemon is already enough but in pokemon diamond there are 150 extra pokemon.
  • 0

#155 Guest_as2win4at

Guest_as2win4at
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:55 PM

386 is enough, or else you get those really really weird names and pokemon that it's just that great after all....
  • 0

#156 Guest_Crimson Itachi

Guest_Crimson Itachi
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2007 - 12:56 PM

150 Pokemons should be enough...
  • 0

#157 Guest_PwnageZz

Guest_PwnageZz
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:06 AM

Theres too many pokemon, i cant keep track
  • 0

#158 Guest_Gunzwarrior

Guest_Gunzwarrior
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:10 AM

ya they should keep it low. The daimond and pearl pokemon suck with the creators running out of ideas.
  • 0

#159 Guest_SreithSZ

Guest_SreithSZ
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:32 AM

>.<NEVER ! Comon, i think now they are over a thousand ! And it's not enough ? I can't even remember the name of the second generation. Don't even ask for more than the NPC/Game story ones, becauze i forgot. that's for sure.it's enough. let's wait 5 years and then maybe they COULD think of a POSSIBLE new group of pokemon...
  • 0

#160 Guest_thegodfatherofwar

Guest_thegodfatherofwar
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:36 AM

i think that thay should try to make it to 1,000 deffrent pokeymon and have them all in 1 game.
  • 0

#161 Guest_Toasty09

Guest_Toasty09
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:36 AM

More pokemon lol yes MORE!!! I've seen too little :laugh:
  • 0

#162 Guest_alex hi

Guest_alex hi
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:40 AM

I think that that that is way to much pokemon.The originals were fine.
  • 0

#163 Guest_rocs

Guest_rocs
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 04:41 AM

No because the creator of pokemon said that he wanted at least 600 pokemon so I want moar pokemon.
  • 0

#164 Guest_Mike81620

Guest_Mike81620
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 05:55 AM

lol i coulnt even catch 150 let alone 386 i havent even beaten 1 pokedex
  • 0

#165 Guest_adiwid

Guest_adiwid
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 05:57 AM

I totally agree that we should be able to see over 386 pokemon... Unfortunately, they might stop making pokemon games soon :laugh:
  • 0

#166 Guest_Duuckie

Guest_Duuckie
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 05:59 AM

i think that 150 pokemon was okay, but more of then just lengthens the game.
  • 0

#167 Guest_gbavn

Guest_gbavn
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 06:43 AM

so do i ! :) :( POINTS were deducted for this post by BishPlease have a look at the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#168 Guest_bluebart_11

Guest_bluebart_11
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 06:53 AM

for games its too many because it takes too long to get them all

I agree.For red blue and yellow I actually wanted to get all 150 now I just don't care enough to get the rest
  • 0

#169 Guest_theman007

Guest_theman007
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 06:57 AM

Maybe 500 would be good. Lots of names to remember for u nerds out there lol jk
  • 0

#170 Guest_dondehead

Guest_dondehead
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 07:05 AM

i believe the latest ones shouldve never happened they look stupid and obviously the creators are running out of names for them. the only thing they should add is more maps to the games and ive always thought that they should have more than 1 save slot just so u can have one save slot for each of the starting pokemon.
  • 0

#171 Guest_Indaig

Guest_Indaig
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 07:07 AM

They should have capped at 400. Half the pokemon suck anyway. (Like half the users here. . .)
  • 0

#172 Guest_matt Haun

Guest_matt Haun
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 07:34 AM

yeh...i mean who thinks of all of them? has anyone actually caught them all? lol?...without cheating...
  • 0

#173 Guest_iamthesex

Guest_iamthesex
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 08:32 AM

I can't wait until there's 1000 pokemon
  • 0

#174 Guest_gambino007

Guest_gambino007
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 June 2007 - 01:36 PM

i say 1000 will do lol
  • 0

#175 Night Mage

Night Mage

    Dragon

  • Active Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 659 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 08 June 2007 - 01:38 PM

Maybe 500 would be good. Lots of names to remember for u nerds out there lol jk

Rofl. Probally around 500 so that the PKMN company could have more time to make the next game.
  • 0