Edited by darklordvada, 21 March 2007 - 12:08 AM.
Is anyone bored of Sony's
Started by
Guest_darklordvada
, Mar 20 2007 11:33 AM
49 replies to this topic
#1
Guest_darklordvada
Guest_darklordvada
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:33 AM
PlayStationPlayStation 2PlayStation 3God of WarGod of War IIGrand TurismoGrand Turismo 2Grand Turismo 3Grand Turismo 4Is it just me, or are their many repeats up there?All I'm saying is, Sony come up with some new names man. Why not PlayStation Extream? Grand Trismo: Sway? God of War: Blood Bath?Creativity, goes a long way.Edit:Sorry for the horrible spelling. Thanks guitar
#2
Guest_Guitarbizarre
Guest_Guitarbizarre
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2007 - 07:03 PM
FINAL FANTASY IFINAL FANTASY IIFINAL FANTASY IIIFINAL FANTASY IVFINAL FANTASY VFINAL FANTASY VIFINAL FANTASY VIIFINAL FANTASY VII DIRGE OF CERBERUSFINAL FANTASY VII CRISIS COREFINAL FANTASY VIIIFINAL FANTASY IXFINAL FANTASY XFINAL FANTASY XIFINAL FANTASY XIIFINAL FANTASY XIIIFINAL FANTASY CRYSTAL CHRONICLESFINAL FANTASY MYSTIC QUESTFINAL FANTASY TACTICSFINAL FANTASY TACTICS ADVANCEIts nothing new. Also, its 'Gran Turismo' not 'Grand Trismo'And if we're slamming on sony for creativity, then why not mention Their 'Release a big one, then a smaller one as we replace it to boost end of lifespan sales' policy with PSone and PStwo.Why not mention their controller design beign exactly the same for a whole damned DECADE. While other companies have made strides in ergonomics and functionality (Not even including the Wiimote!), sony have repackaged and resold the SAME SUBSTANDARD CONTROLLER for over 10 years.
Edited by Guitarbizarre, 20 March 2007 - 07:06 PM.
#3
Guest_cloud1863
Guest_cloud1863
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2007 - 08:58 PM
I think its a bit harsh to just look at it from this perspective. Sure there are many franchises that have been produced, reproduced and re-released, but this is not the only games that are on Sony's console. To be fair the same could be said about Nintendo with the amount of games that bare the Mario name.For me this is not a negative point of gaming, I love playing every new release of a Zelda game, the new PES game is something I look forward to very much and a new Final Fantasy always gets my attention.Their are plenty of other games to keep you occupied with your console. If you have a Wii, PS3 or 360 you should have no complaint of games to play on said system. I think arguments like this can be looked at as pointless console stabbing. No real need for it unless you have a hatred of a certain console.Are these the only games that your PSX/PS2/PS3 produce? Do you have no other Rpg's to try? No other action, adventure, sport or puzzle game? I could go on forever as the first two consoles have produced so many games over the years you could live out the rest of your life trying all the games available. Give it time and the PS3 will have a huge back catalogue of titles.Regarding the controller, what the hell is the need to fix something that isnt broken? Look at the original xbox pad, it was broken therefore needed fixed? They have basically stuck with a formula that works well for the modern console.
Edited by cloud1863, 20 March 2007 - 09:00 PM.
#4
Guest_prinnydewd2
Guest_prinnydewd2
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2007 - 09:09 PM
Sony is really good.... but i only got the ps1 and ps2 hows the ps3? 
POINTS were deducted for this post by Falconer
POINTS were deducted for this post by Falconer
#5
Guest_Jarvis
Guest_Jarvis
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:11 PM
Gran Turismo and God of War are gigantic hits. Why wouldn't they want to make more? You've got to consider that they're first and foremost a business. Don't hold any illusions that their top priority isn't making money.
#6
Guest_Guitarbizarre
Guest_Guitarbizarre
-
- Guest
Posted 20 March 2007 - 11:41 PM
Well for one thing, its uncomfortable, cheaply made, and the analog sticks are in a stupid place that promotes hand fatigue. Not to mention the pressure sensitivity is terrible, the digital buttons feel awful, the analog sticks become slippy and hard to use over time, the analog sticks FEEL crappy and they have juddery instead of smooth motion. Oh, and the sticks have a dead zone up to about half their movement range, which makes precise control finicky at best.Regarding the controller, what the hell is the need to fix something that isnt broken? Look at the original xbox pad, it was broken therefore needed fixed? They have basically stuck with a formula that works well for the modern console.
#7
Guest_darklordvada
Guest_darklordvada
-
- Guest
Posted 21 March 2007 - 12:15 AM
Well Fantasy isn't really Sony's. Square Enix could drop them at any time. And the other way around aswell.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~You guys aren't getting the point, I said lack of creativity, not game bashing. I love GT games The Sony Consoles have always had something I like to play. I'm just saying get some new ideas. Entirely missed the topic......FINAL FANTASY IFINAL FANTASY IIFINAL FANTASY IIIFINAL FANTASY IVFINAL FANTASY VFINAL FANTASY VIFINAL FANTASY VIIFINAL FANTASY VII DIRGE OF CERBERUSFINAL FANTASY VII CRISIS COREFINAL FANTASY VIIIFINAL FANTASY IXFINAL FANTASY XFINAL FANTASY XIFINAL FANTASY XIIFINAL FANTASY XIIIFINAL FANTASY CRYSTAL CHRONICLESFINAL FANTASY MYSTIC QUESTFINAL FANTASY TACTICSFINAL FANTASY TACTICS ADVANCEIts nothing new. Also, its 'Gran Turismo' not 'Grand Trismo'And if we're slamming on sony for creativity, then why not mention Their 'Release a big one, then a smaller one as we replace it to boost end of lifespan sales' policy with PSone and PStwo.Why not mention their controller design beign exactly the same for a whole damned DECADE. While other companies have made strides in ergonomics and functionality (Not even including the Wiimote!), sony have repackaged and resold the SAME SUBSTANDARD CONTROLLER for over 10 years.
#8
Guest_TUN@
Guest_TUN@
-
- Guest
Posted 21 March 2007 - 01:16 AM
hey guess wat? Grand TurismoGrand Turismo 2Grand Turismo 3Grand Turismo 4Grand Turismo HDone more addition to the list. and no hard fealings but the ps3 is just like the ps2 but with better graphics, and the motion sensored controller. thank nintendo
#9
Guest_freexrider
Guest_freexrider
-
- Guest
Posted 21 March 2007 - 03:07 AM
well actually it isnt the sony company that creates the game names. it is actually companies like atari and others like that.
#10
Guest_milamber3333
Guest_milamber3333
-
- Guest
Posted 21 March 2007 - 03:13 AM
Why have a stupid name like god of war blood bath when gow 2 works fine, this is a non-issue ps3 has plenty of other than to complaint about.
#11
Guest_ReignerRuler
Guest_ReignerRuler
-
- Guest
Posted 23 March 2007 - 05:38 PM
Iv hear God Of War is good, iand i love Fianl Fantasy serius and have played them ALL, although they get sold with SONY's creation name on the cover - it does not mean SONY ar the ones coming up with it other than their Console name but comeone what hasnt?PS1PS2PS3GAME BOYGAME BOY COLOURGAME BOY ADVANCENITENDOSUPER NITENDONITENDO DSXBOXXBOX 360Well im not sure about computers......Actually the only consoles without reptivity are infact Sega -> Megadrive ~~~~~-> Wii
#12
Guest_codman24
Guest_codman24
-
- Guest
Posted 23 March 2007 - 09:54 PM
I am a little board of it.
#13
Guest_Longshot
Guest_Longshot
-
- Guest
Posted 23 March 2007 - 11:13 PM
I prefer it when a series has the number next to its name. When it does it shows the companys pride in that game too.If it doesn't it can get confusing, say for example I wanted to play the games in order... but they all have different names, it gets confusing as to what the order of the games was. I also hate it when games names are changed that confuses matters a fair bit too lol.
#14
Guest_killa909
Guest_killa909
-
- Guest
Posted 24 March 2007 - 05:47 PM
well thats your opinion i like the sony controller the best it fits in your hand perfectly the buttons are easy to reach and are in convenient places and i bet you i am not the only one that thinks the controller is great.Well for one thing, its uncomfortable, cheaply made, and the analog sticks are in a stupid place that promotes hand fatigue. Not to mention the pressure sensitivity is terrible, the digital buttons feel awful, the analog sticks become slippy and hard to use over time, the analog sticks FEEL crappy and they have juddery instead of smooth motion. Oh, and the sticks have a dead zone up to about half their movement range, which makes precise control finicky at best.
#15
Guest_lol_notreally
Guest_lol_notreally
-
- Guest
Posted 27 March 2007 - 03:36 PM
no way man. sony's still awesome. who cares if there are repeats? if you like a certain game and there are sequels, it'd be awesome, no? thats just what i think.. kinda like.. "hey cool this game is awesome. HEY COOL THERES ANOTHER ONE." plus it gets better as there are more, usually. but it also depends on the game. and as with Final Fantasy, each one is a different story, with hints of things that are in the others, which are kinda like the Final Fantasy trademark.. so yeah. its all good.
#16
Ish
-
- Dragon's Sentinel
-
- 11,507 posts
Mr. Wonderland
Reputation: 44
Good
Posted 27 March 2007 - 09:38 PM
to tell you the truth sony is isn't lacking anything but the company is stupid why would make a new game console with no exceptionally good games that could help you gain a lot of profit if sony was smart they would have came out with the system late 2007 or 2008 i'm pretty sure they're losing profit
In a wonderland full of dreams that turn into reality.
PSN: Verbalinter39
~I$h
PSN: Verbalinter39
~I$h
#17
Guest_banana_man2
Guest_banana_man2
-
- Guest
Posted 27 March 2007 - 11:34 PM
The lack of innovation isn't that surprising or bothersome.I was just kinda hoping Sony would change the controller design somewhat after years of it being the exact same. Why not just try something fresh? They were going for it with the boomerang but got scared at the gaming community's reaction.
#18
Guest_Zuijiu
Guest_Zuijiu
-
- Guest
Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:28 AM
There are always repeats man. Get used to it.
#19
Guest_skysnolimit
Guest_skysnolimit
-
- Guest
Posted 19 May 2007 - 01:20 PM
well its nothing new halo,halo2 and halo 3but doe sthe game name really matter? at all?
#20
Guest_armageddon89
Guest_armageddon89
-
- Guest
Posted 31 January 2009 - 02:41 AM
seriously, who cares for the names?i think its usefull, i know not to buy halo's and i know to buy final fantasy'syes, HALO SUCKS !!! utterly at that !
#21
Guest_mikeburnfire
Guest_mikeburnfire
-
- Guest
Posted 15 February 2009 - 04:33 AM
Uh, useless topic. Sony is unoriginal because they don't have subtitles? Does that really affect the quality of the game? No.
#22
Guest_beauski
Guest_beauski
-
- Guest
Posted 18 February 2009 - 05:13 AM
personally, im excited for the play station 9
#23
Guest_sk8maniac
Guest_sk8maniac
-
- Guest
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:42 PM
the reason all the final fantasies are the same is bcuz sony doesnt make the DAMN game its Suare Enix who makes it sony just exploits it for their system so back the HECK off. and the reason the controller sytem is the same bcuz its the best one ive ever seen the feel vis great unlike the poobox 3pooty and the button system isnt confusing X, triangle, O, and square arent to hard to figure out i mean u lern ur shapes way b4 u learn ur abc's so its more familiar, it would've been nice 2 keep the boomerang controller though, the joystyk is fabulous unlyk poobox who has their joystiks in two remotely different areas and use the diamond formation of the bouttons which was 1st exploited with playstation along with the d-pad so microsoft is the copycat no creativity in this book. and halo is also a repeating series so microsoft aslo loses alot of creativity points there as well. i also think tht if sony could keep a game on their side since the ps1 all the wayy to the ps3 then i give them points on tht one. and xbox 360 thts pretty freaking dumb, seriously lets name our system after angles YAY, wats next Xbox 720 lol. so anyone who thinks sony isnt original then they're and CUMGUZZLINE DUMBASS WHO HAS NO IDEA WAT THE HELL THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.POINTS were deducted for this post by Father TorquePlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
Edited by sk8maniac, 20 February 2009 - 11:45 PM.
#24
Guest_charlimapi
Guest_charlimapi
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2009 - 02:25 AM
It makes it easier to archive, you should check the angry videogame nerd's "chronologicaly confused about movie sequels" video in youtube.
#25
Guest_biggysorox
Guest_biggysorox
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2009 - 05:32 AM
Actually that is not Sony's fault, it is the choice of Square.I don't think there is a lack of creativity. Look at Xbox. GoW, GoW2Halo, Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo 3 ODSTIt is just most of the PS3 games that sony makes were out on the PSX, so that adds alot of years. Here is a little creativity:MGSMGS 2: Sons of LibertyMGS 3: Snake EaterMGS 4: Guns of the PatriotsFINAL FANTASY IFINAL FANTASY IIFINAL FANTASY IIIFINAL FANTASY IVFINAL FANTASY VFINAL FANTASY VIFINAL FANTASY VIIFINAL FANTASY VII DIRGE OF CERBERUSFINAL FANTASY VII CRISIS COREFINAL FANTASY VIIIFINAL FANTASY IXFINAL FANTASY XFINAL FANTASY XIFINAL FANTASY XIIFINAL FANTASY XIIIFINAL FANTASY CRYSTAL CHRONICLESFINAL FANTASY MYSTIC QUESTFINAL FANTASY TACTICSFINAL FANTASY TACTICS ADVANCEIts nothing new. Also, its 'Gran Turismo' not 'Grand Trismo'And if we're slamming on sony for creativity, then why not mention Their 'Release a big one, then a smaller one as we replace it to boost end of lifespan sales' policy with PSone and PStwo.Why not mention their controller design beign exactly the same for a whole damned DECADE. While other companies have made strides in ergonomics and functionality (Not even including the Wiimote!), sony have repackaged and resold the SAME SUBSTANDARD CONTROLLER for over 10 years.
