Before I even face a legendary pokemon my pokemon's level is alredy higher than the legendary so yeah i can win w/o legendaries
Do you think your wins would fall if you battle without legendary pokemon
Started by
Guest_SkyKingEX
, Mar 26 2007 07:41 PM
130 replies to this topic
#102
Guest_Vampboi
Guest_Vampboi
-
- Guest
Posted 06 May 2007 - 12:38 AM
nope cause im one of the few people who train there pokemon evenly so all my pokemon would pwn something hard
#103
Guest_pokemin
Guest_pokemin
-
- Guest
Posted 06 May 2007 - 01:09 AM
I would win the whole game without legens. I always carry non-legends with me because I never count on them in battle.
#104
Guest_bigtet2000
Guest_bigtet2000
-
- Guest
Posted 06 May 2007 - 11:04 AM
Nah, never thought so.I always win without them 
#105
Guest_pritamkumar
Guest_pritamkumar
-
- Guest
Posted 08 May 2007 - 05:44 PM
It makes the battles easier but you can do just fine without them too...it depends on how u train them and use them..thats all... if u good team of normal pokemon u can defeat teams filled with legends!
#106
Guest_blackdragon1111
Guest_blackdragon1111
-
- Guest
Posted 08 May 2007 - 06:36 PM
legendary pokemon never surpass my normal ones because they sren't all that great
#107
Guest_duck 20000
Guest_duck 20000
-
- Guest
Posted 08 May 2007 - 06:51 PM
its very easy to win without legendaries. just train them up i say. it really easy to defeat trainers anyway they are weaklings
#108
Guest_xXshuyinXx
Guest_xXshuyinXx
-
- Guest
Posted 08 May 2007 - 07:06 PM
talkin bout fire red... Pika.... Chariz... Venus... Wartor.... Dewgong... Alakaz... these are what i use...
#109
Guest_Antiform00
Guest_Antiform00
-
- Guest
Posted 09 May 2007 - 06:35 AM
I dunno. I only use Rayquaza, and hes not exactly a staple....
#110
Guest_Mosthunted
Guest_Mosthunted
-
- Guest
Posted 09 May 2007 - 07:02 AM
Nope, I don't relly on legendry pokemon.
#111
Guest_Raymond
Guest_Raymond
-
- Guest
Posted 09 May 2007 - 09:23 AM
well i dont think that i would loose if i had a legion of dragon and psychic pokemon.
#112
Guest_metallicslammerz
Guest_metallicslammerz
-
- Guest
Posted 09 May 2007 - 11:45 AM
foe me legendaries are just a collection.... i don't use them to battle like in the league
#113
Guest_RyomaEchizen
Guest_RyomaEchizen
-
- Guest
Posted 09 May 2007 - 01:38 PM
a team of balance can aldy.. like a starter and one flying type, fighting and psy can deal with them all
#114
Guest_boobies be me
Guest_boobies be me
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 07:24 PM
i dont need no legendary pokemon i fight with the pokemon i first started with. i didnt need my legendary pokemon so i traded them to my friends fors other pokemon nd rare items
#115
Guest_pr4n4y
Guest_pr4n4y
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 08:13 PM
i would own if there were no legendaries, because i never use them haha.
#116
Guest_lolollol
Guest_lolollol
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 08:50 AM
legendaries are really good because they dont seem to have many weaknesses (some) they can tank other pokemon and i think my wins would NOT fall with out a legendary pokemon
#117
Guest_Antz119
Guest_Antz119
-
- Guest
Posted 04 August 2007 - 10:55 AM
To me I think Legendary Pokemon are just there for you to catch and treasure/admire, not to be used in a battle, I think using it in a battle make the game not worthwhile, because I'd like to let myself know that I have skills, using Legendary Pokemon makes me feel like I'm cheating to get my way up to that skill~
#118
Guest_Dawdiiio
Guest_Dawdiiio
-
- Guest
Posted 08 March 2010 - 10:53 PM
I usually don't bother with Legendaries at all, once in a while I do bother to catch them, since they just makes the game a bit to easy. Wouldn't it be more fun if you could beat the game with 6 Pokemon from the starting area? Like the 5 first different Pokemons you run into? I'll try that next time ^^
#119
Guest_Nintendo ds lite games
Guest_Nintendo ds lite games
-
- Guest
Posted 12 March 2010 - 09:48 PM
i think you could fall witout it
#120
Guest_LostTraveler
Guest_LostTraveler
-
- Guest
Posted 19 September 2010 - 07:35 PM
If it was a Lv 100 battle, I could win or make the battle interesting IF my opponents don't use legendary pokemon themselves.
#121
Guest_stealth917
Guest_stealth917
-
- Guest
Posted 20 September 2010 - 04:35 AM
i've won plenty of battles using no legends at all, and when they use legends...i think they're to cheap using them
#122
RKR666
-
- Member
-
- 204 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 26 October 2010 - 06:43 PM
No, my best pokemons aren't legendary and they win my battles with ease.
The History Of Light and Dark is write in Blood!
#123
Guest_pikachu4ever
Guest_pikachu4ever
-
- Guest
Posted 27 October 2010 - 02:23 AM
Against a well trained legendary team, you would lose no matter what if you didn't use legendaries. That's why Pokemon are separated into different groups--legendaries, OU, and UU. But I personally am really good without legendaries but only when I play non-legendary teams.
#124
The Mothman
-
- Active Member
-
- 805 posts
The Monster of Mason County
Reputation: 3
Neutral
Posted 16 December 2010 - 03:38 AM
I'm more than capable of winning Pokemon battles without legendaries. Mewtwo is a Pokemon I love to have in my party, though. I've beaten friends with starter Pokemon (not evolved) in the 50s (levels) against savage Pokemon like Gyarados and Rhydon. As long as your Pokemon are well trained, you will only lose if your opponent is the better trainer.
#125
Guest_adjiekujie
Guest_adjiekujie
-
- Guest
Posted 22 December 2010 - 02:31 AM
imho i could still win without using legendary pokemon.at the early parts of the game you will just use starter pokemon and the common ones right? so it will be fine without it.but in some cases, legendary pokemon will become very useful.like in pokemon sapphire,kyogre is very useful against the elite 4 because it can pwn a lot especially against steven.
