Yea i think so. Because your starter pokemon you get should always be the highest of all your pokemon. but i think i could win without legendary pokemon.
Do you think your wins would fall if you battle without legendary pokemon
Started by
Guest_SkyKingEX
, Mar 26 2007 07:41 PM
130 replies to this topic
#127
Linkhs
-
- Member
-
- 29 posts
Egg
Reputation: 3
Neutral
Posted 21 April 2011 - 05:45 PM
I really think that a lot of legendaries actually have huge weak points. A friend of mine loves training legendaries, and is a good trainer. Her Darkrai was taken down easily by a friend who has used Taunt on it, so Darkrai couldn't put things to sleep. Once you know was a legendary's specialty is, it's not hard at all to take them down.That said, I don't think you're automatically a bad trainer if you use legendaries, so long as you know how to use them right. That's the real challenge.
#128
Guest_Nakura
Guest_Nakura
-
- Guest
Posted 23 April 2011 - 01:16 PM
Well, I'd have never beaten the Elite Four in White without my Zekrom (well I would have eventually, but I'm lazy and wanted to get it over with quickly). After my lv100 Zekrom the only usful Pokemon I've got is my lv91 Hydreigon. Back when I played FireRed my bro would always beat my team with his Mewtwo no matter how many legendaries I shoved in there, but then Mewtwo is pretty tough and I'm not really good at link battles.
#129
Guest_boomgb
Guest_boomgb
-
- Guest
Posted 13 December 2011 - 03:24 PM
no my starters win most battles
#130
Guest_zalc
Guest_zalc
-
- Guest
Posted 19 December 2011 - 11:30 PM
Not only legendaries are OU, you know... Blissey, Scizor, Garchomp, Mence etc etc can be a bigger pain to fight
#131
PokeSTD's
-
- Active Member
-
- 204 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 93
Great
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:09 AM
I dont really battle with legends, the only time i do is with friends and thats just because thats how we battle.
ΩYLAMΩ
