Do U think that Gamers r more likely to be Virgins
#1
Guest_SkyKingEX
Posted 15 May 2007 - 04:38 PM
#2
Guest_nevfx
Posted 15 May 2007 - 05:53 PM
Edited by nevfx, 15 May 2007 - 05:53 PM.
#3
Guest_icychillx
Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:26 AM
#4
Guest_ewok_3000
Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:30 AM
I don't think many people could.As for me, I'm not a gaming kind of person...not my style. I'd rather go out and get drunk, than be at home, playing a game.No, I dont think so. Most gamers do actually go outside the house. Its computer nerds (I couldn't think of a more nice way to say it) that are going to be 40 year old virgins. I could never be a 40 year old virgin. *scared*
#5
Guest_Blazimaster
Posted 16 May 2007 - 09:35 PM
#6
Guest_zman_gman
Posted 16 May 2007 - 10:34 PM
No way dudes i mean who doesn't game these daysGive reasons For you answer.I dont think soo unless you are the stay at home kid who would rather hang out with you r gba and catch all 493 Pokemon you're safe
#7
Guest_nevfx
Posted 16 May 2007 - 10:53 PM
Thats a good point, actually, nearly everyone plays games nowadays, some more then others, obviously. I saw a statistic that most dudes are virgins until there 18. I saw another one that guys think about sex evey 6 seconds, on average.No way dudes i mean who doesn't game these days
#8
Posted 17 May 2007 - 01:11 AM
#9
Guest_kuraiohitsuji
Posted 17 May 2007 - 01:19 AM
#10
Guest_Lamboseng
Posted 17 May 2007 - 08:56 AM
#11
Guest_magimaster123456
Posted 17 May 2007 - 09:32 AM
#12
Guest_mprsondheart
Posted 17 May 2007 - 09:35 AM
#13
Guest_MrMus
Posted 17 May 2007 - 12:41 PM
#14
Guest_SkyKingEX
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:51 AM
Edited by SkyKingEX, 21 May 2007 - 02:51 AM.
#15
Guest_~TK~
Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:18 AM
#16
Guest_QB∞
Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:24 AM
Pathetic, seriously.well they could pay for sex
Try joining them....and i no a lot of gamers who have gfs and might lose ther virginity soon
#17
Guest_conductor
Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:28 AM
#18
Guest_argy-sama
Posted 21 May 2007 - 04:10 AM
#19
Guest_Imakuni1
Posted 21 May 2007 - 04:51 AM
#20
Guest_whitewing1004
Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:49 AM
Edited by whitewing1004, 21 May 2007 - 08:50 AM.
#21
Guest_arsephish
Posted 21 May 2007 - 06:20 PM
#22
Guest_Dekar_Serverbot
Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:18 PM
#23
Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:58 PM
Edited by No. Just no., 21 May 2007 - 08:58 PM.
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
#24
Guest_drm4x
Posted 21 May 2007 - 09:23 PM
#25
Guest_ohiohilbil4
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:58 PM











