not too long not too shortGPs were deducted for this post, please read the rules! - Black Math Horseman
short or long games?
Started by
Guest_cheeeez
, Jun 17 2007 10:54 PM
405 replies to this topic
#252
Guest_diesel_guy
Guest_diesel_guy
-
- Guest
Posted 28 June 2009 - 10:46 PM
i think we all want long games... we didnt spend 60 bucks for a short game and to not be able to return it to gamestop for a full refund
#253
Guest_Kortelous
Guest_Kortelous
-
- Guest
Posted 28 June 2009 - 11:19 PM
I prefer midlength games. Seven hours is too short, eighty is waaay too long. Look forward to 30 hour games, myself.
#254
Guest_Kypris
Guest_Kypris
-
- Guest
Posted 30 June 2009 - 06:53 AM
Long games! I can't stand feeling like I didn't get my moneys worth because I beat a game in under 10 hours. It needs to have some meat in it!
#255
Guest_terras_light
Guest_terras_light
-
- Guest
Posted 01 July 2009 - 04:51 AM
I guess longer sometimes mean that it has good replay value also? Yeah, I definitely like longer games. However, for shorter games like Phoenix Wright, I like to spend hours on them until I beat them.
#256
Guest_carreragt113
Guest_carreragt113
-
- Guest
Posted 02 July 2009 - 07:10 AM
one should also take replay value into account. if you cant get tired of the game, then its better to be long. deep racing games like Gran turismo fit the bill perfectly
#258
Guest_Dariex
Guest_Dariex
-
- Guest
Posted 02 July 2009 - 05:02 PM
It depends. I usually wish games were longer. Games like MGS4 and The World Ends with you are games i wish were much longer because of the storyline and gameplay. I also feel this way about kingdom hearts. The games are far to short for me. Games like pokemon though...pretty long but fun in a never-die kind of way.
#259
Guest_Ray79456
Guest_Ray79456
-
- Guest
Posted 02 July 2009 - 07:29 PM
Longer games have more value sometimes, but other times you just want them to end like Fallout. On the other hand short games are great sometimes and have a good replay value.
#260
Guest_Kwi
Guest_Kwi
-
- Guest
Posted 02 July 2009 - 08:04 PM
Longer games, short ones just annoy me because they're beaten too fastx.X"
#261
Guest_alwayne
Guest_alwayne
-
- Guest
Posted 03 July 2009 - 01:03 AM
longer games of course because sucks pay lots of money for a short game
#262
Guest_Takenoth
Guest_Takenoth
-
- Guest
Posted 03 July 2009 - 09:44 PM
The longer the better, as long as it have a plot! Otherwise, if it's long and it doesn't go anywhere, no thanks.Short games aren't really preferable, but I do enjoy some...although it leaves that lingering feeling that something is missing.
#263
Guest_Fuberglux
Guest_Fuberglux
-
- Guest
Posted 04 July 2009 - 05:47 AM
It depends on the game, Like Katamari's short, but it's one of my favorite games. Longer games are fun too, but only if they can keep from being repetitive. Once it gets to fighting the same monsters for hours on end, the game kinda fails.
#264
Guest_Jointsftw
Guest_Jointsftw
-
- Guest
Posted 04 July 2009 - 06:05 AM
Long games cuz usually there's more story involved and more charactersthat's what makes the game more interesting
#265
Guest_VaNgBoi
Guest_VaNgBoi
-
- Guest
Posted 05 July 2009 - 09:36 PM
i think everyone would agree would that long games would be better but i dont like that much of a long gamei like games as long as Kh2 for example
#266
Guest_Scarlet Lotus
Guest_Scarlet Lotus
-
- Guest
Posted 07 July 2009 - 02:25 AM
LOng ones are nice, that if they got a nice story and interesting missions or bosses.
#267
Guest_cdrock
Guest_cdrock
-
- Guest
Posted 07 July 2009 - 05:07 PM
Well, I like longer games better. I feel like I get more for the money I spend. And, with games that have great stories (mostly RPGs), I like them to be long, so I can enjoy and live the stories that I am given. Kingdom Hearts, for example. Mmhm. 
#268
Guest_specialfred0
Guest_specialfred0
-
- Guest
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:28 PM
I prefer long games that don't become to repetitive in a boring manner. There are some out there but not as many as I would expect by now. There are some, such as Kingdom Hearts, that just captured my interest, and kept me going until the end, and then some. I do however, like short games, that were very enjoyable, and have a lot of replay value. These games are also lacking in number, of what they could be. Overall, when you sift through the crappy games, glance past the mediocre games, play thought the good ones, and cherish the great ones, you'll find that whatever the length of the game, you'll put quite a bit of time into them.
#270
Guest_Dante Sparda
Guest_Dante Sparda
-
- Guest
Posted 10 July 2009 - 01:28 AM
oh yes long games i hate that i spend $60 for a game i only play for the amount of 3 days when i used to play old snes games for like a week and thats playing usually all night or hours
#271
Guest_Ty-Tage
Guest_Ty-Tage
-
- Guest
Posted 10 July 2009 - 02:00 PM
Super long games. Like 40+Actually 40 is medium for me.4 hours FPSs sicken me.
#272
Wadever77
-
- Member
-
- 337 posts
Winged Serpent
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 10 July 2009 - 05:12 PM
I really really want a game that is long like hell, perhaps 70 hours or more.. but, I have a very high requirement, I do not want the game to be too repetitive, games like rachet and clank is a little too over repetitive, but it is still fun overall..
When the going gets tough, the tough goes shopping...
#273
Guest_Sean_7978
Guest_Sean_7978
-
- Guest
Posted 11 July 2009 - 07:59 AM
As long as its a great game, short.Portal is the perfect example of this.
#274
Guest_Doci007
Guest_Doci007
-
- Guest
Posted 14 July 2009 - 12:09 AM
Looooonnnng games but not too repetitives games...
#275
Guest_KyLeDoNg
Guest_KyLeDoNg
-
- Guest
Posted 14 July 2009 - 12:11 AM
I like long ones that are pretty easy but basicly don't give you the answers
