. But I still prefer gameplay 'cause the Gameplay can really get you addicted to the game, .
Graphics or Gameplay?
Started by
Guest_Jordaneh
, Jul 10 2007 10:19 PM
182 replies to this topic
#126
Guest_C-P-U
Guest_C-P-U
-
- Guest
Posted 14 June 2008 - 03:23 PM
I'm with the majority with this one. I prefer Gameplay more than Graphics....The Graphics are important, no way I'd play a game lookin' like Teletubies, . But I still prefer gameplay 'cause the Gameplay can really get you addicted to the game, .
. But I still prefer gameplay 'cause the Gameplay can really get you addicted to the game, .
#127
Guest_daniel88888888
Guest_daniel88888888
-
- Guest
Posted 14 June 2008 - 05:17 PM
i like both, but gameplay is much more important. what's the use of good graphics if the gameplay sucks? actually, i could live with n64 graphics now.
#128
Guest_manny^.^
Guest_manny^.^
-
- Guest
Posted 15 June 2008 - 08:12 AM
gmaeplay is all that matters to meif the graphics suck but the gameplay is totally kick ass then i dont mindalthough i will hate myself when my eyes start to hurt from the horrible graphics
#129
Guest_Devil Dee
Guest_Devil Dee
-
- Guest
Posted 15 June 2008 - 03:13 PM
the game play is always a lot more important than the graphics. i usually find myself going back to the older games that i have loved so much. Sure good graphics helps but i still believe that without the good game play it would be a waste of time.what would be the point if the game had the most realistic graphics in the world but in that game all you do is walk down a street.
#130
Guest_vZakat
Guest_vZakat
-
- Guest
Posted 15 June 2008 - 06:07 PM
Without gameplay a game will be forgotten as soon as a better looking game comes out. All the long lasting classics are good because of the gameplay they had.
#131
Guest_OOOTTTIII
Guest_OOOTTTIII
-
- Guest
Posted 16 June 2008 - 10:15 AM
Actually i care about gameplay much more than graphics. I play old games really often, so the bad graphics doesn't bother me
#132
Guest_BTTB
Guest_BTTB
-
- Guest
Posted 16 June 2008 - 03:29 PM
Well...i think that gameplay>graphicsIt's sad that Sony games are getting crappier,since Sony decided to make real-looking games without a good gameplay(of course,there are exceptions)An example of this is Nintendo.Every console is a revolution is confronted with the previous one.THIS is trying to improve gameplay.(Prepared to be killed by Sony consolle war fans)
#133
Guest_Mother3_FTW!!!
Guest_Mother3_FTW!!!
-
- Guest
Posted 16 June 2008 - 09:15 PM
Well, it depends. If the graphics are really, REALLY bad (like they make your brain hurt), then even the gameplay wouldn't make up for it. But since most games aren't like that, Gameplay>Graphics.And I agree with you, BTTB. Sony's Graphics Over Gameplay feel for games is why they're losing this console war.
#134
Guest_Rom Grabber
Guest_Rom Grabber
-
- Guest
Posted 16 June 2008 - 11:34 PM
Graphics and game play go hand in hand to make a great game, but when it comes down to it game play is more important.
#135
natecola
-
- Active Member
-
- 301 posts
Thrasher
Reputation: 1
Neutral
Posted 17 June 2008 - 12:10 AM
Obviously gameplay is more important, and that's why I prefer Nintendo. Everyone knows that Nintendo isn't up to speed on graphics, but also everyone knows that they have been innovating since they began in the '80s.I've played really bad games that had graphics that blew me away. On the other hand, I've played games that handle so well I don't even care about the graphics. Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 64 is a great example of this.
moderators are hatin'
#136
Guest_seijijudy1
Guest_seijijudy1
-
- Guest
Posted 17 June 2008 - 06:46 AM
gameplay ofcos, if ur graphic soooooo good n soooo much better but ur gameplay sucks like 
, no 1 feel like playin it, but if both gameplay n graphic is good, then u r gonna get rated as the best game of the year, like final fantasy or onimusha
, no 1 feel like playin it, but if both gameplay n graphic is good, then u r gonna get rated as the best game of the year, like final fantasy or onimusha
#137
Guest_zeroxeon5
Guest_zeroxeon5
-
- Guest
Posted 17 June 2008 - 10:56 AM
Seeing as how CS 1.6 and Rollertoaster Tycoon are my favorite games currently, I'd have to say gameplay is moar important. tbh, I expected virtually everyone who voted to put down gameplay as more important, and perhaps those who voted vice versa did it for the lulz or misread it. I don't want my games to be boring picture books.
#138
Guest_sakuragokuha1
Guest_sakuragokuha1
-
- Guest
Posted 17 June 2008 - 03:42 PM
liking a game just because of its graphics is silly. Gameplay is always the most important aspect for me.
#139
Guest_AncientVoid
Guest_AncientVoid
-
- Guest
Posted 19 June 2008 - 11:51 AM
I guess game play matters more, but both should be taken into consideration. I mean either one without the other is like a fish swimming on land.
#140
Guest_Dark Knight J
Guest_Dark Knight J
-
- Guest
Posted 20 June 2008 - 08:35 PM
Game play is more important than graphic. If you had a really good looking game but the game itself sucked whats the point of playing it.
#141
Guest_~aimiee
Guest_~aimiee
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:40 PM
gameplay, but graphics is important too cause i don't want to play a really good game that i can't tell if the hero guy is hot or not because the graphics are like pong
#142
Guest_lollere
Guest_lollere
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2008 - 06:07 PM
the people who voted graphics are probably arts students and not gamers
#143
acicon
-
- Active Member
-
- 139 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 21 June 2008 - 06:24 PM
good graphics is important but gameplay is the main body of the gameso i choose gameplaybut if it has crappy graphics, it lowers the appeal
"There are things that won't be rewarded for the effort."
Which character are you test by Naruto - Kun.com
Which character are you test by Naruto - Kun.com
#144
Guest_xbob
Guest_xbob
-
- Guest
Posted 21 June 2008 - 08:14 PM
Gameplay is so much more important then graphics in my opinion.
#145
Guest_jim bate
Guest_jim bate
-
- Guest
Posted 22 June 2008 - 12:41 PM
half life two was amazing, because it combined both (they still use its physics engine). but i can still sit down and play tetris for hours and not get bored. crysis, a game designed to show off the engine, bored me after a while, and only had about 6-8 hours in it. that had fantastic graphics, but not enough gameplay. gameplay is much more important.
#146
Guest_plooma
Guest_plooma
-
- Guest
Posted 23 June 2008 - 07:03 AM
Definitely gameplay. I gave up on FFXII because of the gameplay...I have an eye for amazing graphics (i.e. Odin Sphere), but gameplay matters more. It determines a game's replay value and how enjoyable it is 
.
.
#147
Guest_Civickid96
Guest_Civickid96
-
- Guest
Posted 23 June 2008 - 08:21 AM
Hand me Gameplay over graphics anyday. I would much rather play Castlevania: Symphony of the Night or any Castlevania 2-D games than their 3-D counterparts. Same goes for the Super Mario and Zelda series.--Michael
#148
Guest_DavyD15
Guest_DavyD15
-
- Guest
Posted 23 June 2008 - 11:00 AM
who cares as long as the games fun
#149
Guest_Drach_th3_Bl00dy
Guest_Drach_th3_Bl00dy
-
- Guest
Posted 23 June 2008 - 11:08 AM
gameplay, though nice and shiny is good every now and then...though sometimes you just want a classic with awesome gameplay to geta facelift...
#150
Guest_damehguy
Guest_damehguy
-
- Guest
Posted 23 June 2008 - 05:13 PM
gameplay because i'd rather be doin something than sitting there watching the characters looking good
