Jump to content


Counter Strike


  • Please log in to reply
103 replies to this topic

#76 Guest_DoYoX

Guest_DoYoX
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 November 2007 - 02:32 PM

source graphs better... 1.6 graphs still oldskool... dead bodies in source is like real... but the maps, i still love 1.6 series... nicer.. source map is so complicated... and there is only a few maps....
  • 0

#77 Guest_poliop

Guest_poliop
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 November 2007 - 04:53 PM

don't play that often, but source is way better
  • 0

#78 Guest_Monnl

Guest_Monnl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:51 PM

What is source?i don't know about that ,i just play 1.6
  • 0

#79 Guest_l005cr3w

Guest_l005cr3w
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 December 2007 - 10:31 AM

What is source?i don't know about that ,i just play 1.6

Counter-Strike: Source is basically (a remake of) Counter-Strike on the new Source engine. Still I prefer 1.6 more than CS:S.
  • 0

#80 Guest_ilovetictacs

Guest_ilovetictacs
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:22 PM

its only for my own personal opinion but i like CS:Source better although requires a better system requirements than of 1.6 thats why people go for CS 1.6 instead for a lower requirements...

that is one of the reasons, thats definitly one of the reasons i play 1.6also that 1.6 is a little harder, theres more recoil on the guns, i played source and theres a big enough difference in the recoil that you would noticeand the pistols are stronger in Source, only a couple though, one of them i know is the dual elites, there stronger in source, plus you can throw nades pretty easily in source, as in 1.6 you have to do all these fancy screen moving just to get the nade to go where you want it to
  • 0

#81 Guest_andre_naarstad

Guest_andre_naarstad
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:49 PM

i like sours best, it is becaus it is harder to kill. :D
  • 0

#82 Guest_Ivan Windwaker

Guest_Ivan Windwaker
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 December 2007 - 02:27 AM

I always preferred 1.6 over Source. The only thing I liked about Source was the extended maps (certain ones, such as Assault). I preferred the feel of 1.6 more than Source, though they are about the same. I just feel more comfortable with 1.6 than Source.
  • 0

#83 Guest_cedricyeosj

Guest_cedricyeosj
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 December 2007 - 04:36 AM

i prefer 1.6 too.. although Source graphics are much better, it slows my computer down.. ;)
  • 0

#84 Guest_Vi3t-X

Guest_Vi3t-X
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 11 December 2007 - 03:50 AM

Source is a much more realistic version of CS, although my favourite would have to be OLD OLD OLD, Iceage, Caveman, ---> SkoolMy favourite of all time? CS. 1.0
  • 0

#85 Guest_hhshs

Guest_hhshs
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 16 December 2007 - 11:29 AM

Ya, 1.6 is really awsome
  • 0

#86 Guest_V4mpz0r

Guest_V4mpz0r
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 December 2007 - 02:51 PM

CS:S may look better but ive played CS 1.6 for 9 years i think i vote for 1.6 :D
  • 0

#87 Guest_malachi95x

Guest_malachi95x
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 December 2007 - 05:39 AM

counter strike is very good
  • 0

#88 Guest_viper3444

Guest_viper3444
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 December 2007 - 11:06 AM

i think 1.6 will be the best
  • 0

#89 Guest_joseph paul

Guest_joseph paul
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 December 2007 - 12:12 PM

I think Counter Strike 1.6 is better.

my father is GCHQ admin from GCHQ=main from oportowe actually are portuguese but my father knows a lot english person
  • 0

#90 Guest_MarioMoon

Guest_MarioMoon
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 December 2007 - 10:06 PM

They just play 1.6 because they are used to it, source is way better and the current game
  • 0

#91 Guest_reapercrapster

Guest_reapercrapster
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 December 2007 - 06:14 AM

1.6 generates a more LAN gaming feel with the different models.With source it looks like your typical single player FPS. I mean, come on, all the terrorists and CTs are exactly the same it takes the thrill of friendly fire and getting shot in the face and going "WTF?! I thought that guy was on my team!"
  • 0

#92 Guest_Carmelosaurio

Guest_Carmelosaurio
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 December 2007 - 09:14 AM

1.6 its way better than source
  • 0

#93 Guest_zhikai_pek

Guest_zhikai_pek
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 December 2007 - 11:15 AM

1.6 is so much better cos it is classic.
  • 0

#94 Guest_tikian

Guest_tikian
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 22 December 2007 - 10:27 PM

neither, cant belive i dropped 40 bucks on a copy of scource...
  • 0

#95 Guest_RandomUserName1

Guest_RandomUserName1
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 December 2007 - 03:30 AM

Pros play 1.6, Amatures play Source, that's the way it goes.
  • 0

#96 Guest_Rohan1

Guest_Rohan1
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 12 May 2009 - 10:12 AM

i have bouth, but sourcePOINTS were deducted for this post by Channel28Please refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#97 Guest_protagonist47

Guest_protagonist47
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 14 May 2009 - 01:59 AM

source deagle is way too easy to hs with compared to the 1.6 deagle. it's ridiculous. also tower stacking, bunny hopping, and better knives in 1.6
  • 0

#98 Ericson-x

Ericson-x

    Hatchling

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 83 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 31 May 2009 - 11:07 AM

LOL Flash bang kill in the ba... anyway i like 1.6 than Source even if the accuracy of almost all weapons are not 100% you can still do some GREAT MAGIC
  • 0

#99 mario17690

mario17690

    Egg

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 22 October 2009 - 03:24 AM

Counter Source is for rookies 1.6 is for real players
  • 0

#100 Guest_im3izero

Guest_im3izero
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 October 2009 - 11:06 AM

1.5,I think it is the classic version ;)
  • 0