Jump to content


who hates all those new pokemon


  • Please log in to reply
392 replies to this topic

#301 Guest_A Redneck

Guest_A Redneck
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 April 2008 - 12:05 AM

yeah i hate the new pokemon and how the hell do you say half there namesyeah i hate the new pokemon and how the hell do you say half there namessorry for the double post didnt mean to
  • 0

#302 Guest_HYPHYAZZAJ

Guest_HYPHYAZZAJ
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 April 2008 - 12:22 AM

i hate the new pokemon
  • 0

#303 Guest_patrick111

Guest_patrick111
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 April 2008 - 12:26 AM

The new Pokemon are 'aight but i think there are too many. It's just the old crap all over again but with a different name. They should make it more interesting. It would be awsome if there was a Pokemon game that was like Super Smash Bros. where you can actually control them. That would be awsome imo ^^
  • 0

#304 Guest_jamesacope

Guest_jamesacope
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 April 2008 - 08:54 AM

I hate the new pokemon
  • 0

#305 Guest_MagicKirby

Guest_MagicKirby
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 April 2008 - 08:55 AM

It died after Pokemon Gold/Silver.I'd rather shoot myself than see 10 year-old Ash from Diamond/PearlChange of plans, I'd save us all and shoot him.
  • 0

#306 Guest_watashi420

Guest_watashi420
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 April 2008 - 11:01 AM

i heard sumthin. about you, liking mudkipz lolz!
  • 0

#307 Guest_reckloose45

Guest_reckloose45
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 April 2008 - 12:12 PM

i would agree with you, but houndooms one of my favs and hes not original
  • 0

#308 Guest_neoghost123

Guest_neoghost123
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 April 2008 - 08:39 PM

i dont hate them but they arent so good as ones beforeJohto pokes are the best
  • 0

#309 Guest_ihumid

Guest_ihumid
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 April 2008 - 08:49 PM

Pokemon lost it's flair quite a while ago with me.
  • 0

#310 sakred

sakred

    Hatchling

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 74 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 20 April 2008 - 10:21 PM

They should realize the education in AMerica is going down so they shouldnt introduce many new pokemon at once but its still very popular so who gives a
  • 0

#311 Guest_mcbush

Guest_mcbush
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 July 2008 - 11:13 AM

well since I only know the new one's I like them
  • 0

#312 Guest_simonaow

Guest_simonaow
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 July 2008 - 12:58 PM

nah bro i reckon the new pokemon are pretty cool looking aye they may look weird but i played pokemon pearl on ds and its pretty hard but cool not to many to catch on it though
  • 0

#313 Guest_maple123456789

Guest_maple123456789
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 July 2008 - 03:22 PM

I agree that the old pokemon is better than the new pokemon the names are quite weird
  • 0

#314 Guest_davidthehouck

Guest_davidthehouck
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 12:22 AM

I do! I couldn't stand the new ones in Pokemon Pearl/Diamond. I'll stick with Red/Blue and Gold/Silver.
  • 0

#315 Guest_PK-mario

Guest_PK-mario
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 02:49 AM

NEw pokemon = confusing...I mean seriously, one example...lemme look it up...Ah! here we go! DArkrai...ummmmmmsounds like evil raichu...but not. it's a wierd demented steroid addictted gasthly. yuck
  • 0

#316 Guest_Editede

Guest_Editede
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 02:57 AM

I must say, I hate the new pokemon.e__eI think they ran out of ideas.xPThey should use more of the old ones. I'd love to see more of the Johto pokemon. I actually think that the Johto pokemon were just as good as the Kanto ones. And personally, I didn't mind the pokemon in Ruby and Sapphire. But Diamond and Pearl, no thanks.xPAnd when it comes to the anime, it was yes, repetitive. Yes, the villians were idiots. Yes, Ash was an idiot. But yes, it used to be entertaining.It all fell apart when they fired the entire voice acting cast.
  • 0

#317 Guest_halffall

Guest_halffall
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 03:32 AM

Originals from blue and red were much cooler than all the subsequent additions.
  • 0

#318 Guest_thredith

Guest_thredith
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 03:40 AM

Me! I was happy with the first 150 Pokemons! Now all the serie is crowded with thousands of pocket monsters.... they should stop creating new creatures! is exaggerated!
  • 0

#319 Guest_buyinstantcow

Guest_buyinstantcow
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 04:35 AM

yeah new pokemon are pretty dumb as there just taking the old ones and add more evolutions they got pretty bad after 2nd generation
  • 0

#320 Guest_Meowth

Guest_Meowth
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 04:53 AM

I played the new diamond game and I was like wtf where did all the cool ones goe? they should get the stuff together cuz new pokemon don't make the series better, go with the better storyline plot for a change

I'm all for them introducing more pokemon. I mean aside from how they look they introduce new movesets, and other variables such as diff base stats between them and innate abilities. More variety is always better.
  • 0

#321 Guest_gembalina

Guest_gembalina
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 09:11 AM

I don't like the new games at all
  • 0

#322 Guest_Blade_Lord

Guest_Blade_Lord
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 12:29 PM

Some of them.The others...I'll spare my comment to avoid heartache of the Pokemon lovers.
  • 0

#323 Guest_nons

Guest_nons
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 July 2008 - 10:16 PM

I don't hate it. why would u hate it, it's amazing and cool.
  • 0

#324 Guest_tomzdaman

Guest_tomzdaman
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 October 2008 - 11:00 PM

new pokemon r 2 dojjyPOINTS were deducted for this post by KHRSPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#325 Guest_lubis1

Guest_lubis1
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 October 2008 - 12:35 AM

the older the better. its the sme in movies
  • 0