I'm not really a fan
who hates all those new pokemon
Started by
Guest_pokemondude222
, Jul 25 2007 07:30 AM
392 replies to this topic
#27
Guest_solarkactus
Guest_solarkactus
-
- Guest
Posted 27 July 2007 - 11:56 PM
yeah, the new ones are just getting weirder and weirderwith different variations of colours, and so on... and so forth
#28
Guest_qttask
Guest_qttask
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:15 AM
The first Pokemon are the best, they aren't gay, they're hardcore! 
except for Mew..
except for Mew..
#29
Guest_rasmus-the-kid
Guest_rasmus-the-kid
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:21 AM
too many!... itīs not fun more and keeping adding will make things even worse... but hvo cares?
#30
Guest_nicodcd
Guest_nicodcd
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:30 AM
I played the new diamond game and I was like wtf where did all the cool ones goe? they should get the stuff together cuz new pokemon don't make the series better, go with the better storyline plot for a change
#31
Guest_gerbilx
Guest_gerbilx
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:32 AM
Whoa, kinda creepy; all the hate. This just in guys, you don't have to catch them all, and doing so by no means you have to train them all and memorize the names of them all. And when it comes to breeding games, it's rather nice to have new breeds when a new game is released. No one would pay money to play the exact same thing over, and over, and over again. That said, each Pokemon game is fairly similar to its predecessor in gameplay, but the thing that makes it fun is catching new monsters. And remembering names is by no means a chore guys. It's rather sad that I se this as the biggest gripe. What I really find pathetic is the complete lack of mention of both the EV and IV system in the games post-crystal, as well as actually mating and breding to produce your perfect fighting machine. And natures as well, hold items. You /do not/ see such similar things in other breeding games and the fact that every individual species has different base stats, gives different EVs, and each and every monster you catch, regardless of species will hav unique IVs is really a testament to the series, /post Red/Blue/Yellow/ as fantastic breeding games. Honestly guys. Now I will admit the show got old after you realized Ash ws never, ever going to get anywhere.
#32
Guest_Zavoria
Guest_Zavoria
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:58 AM
They killed the series after red and blue with all the new pokemon
#33
Guest_DarkFighterXX
Guest_DarkFighterXX
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 01:55 AM
i dont hate the new onesi love the new onesi just hate to have them all rememberedbecause they have over 300 pokemons right now
#34
Guest_Da Sparkly
Guest_Da Sparkly
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:43 PM
i hate all the new pokemon becuse they look soooooooooooooo gay i mean my brother can draw beter pics then the new pokemon and he can not draw if his life depended on it
#35
Guest_SunnySunny
Guest_SunnySunny
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:51 PM
Honestly I thought the new legendary pokemon looked more like Digimon. The style looks rather different from that of the original or those prior to the latest. Yea, it is supposed to be new and futuristic and what not, but sure brings back good memories when pokemon looked cool.
#36
Guest_Matt_42
Guest_Matt_42
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 01:59 PM
yeah old ones are the best
#37
Guest_Flama the foxangel
Guest_Flama the foxangel
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 03:08 PM
Well, they look weird and ugly, just the legendaries look cool. You can't keep making good and original pokemons after 200+...
#38
Guest_peios
Guest_peios
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 03:18 PM
not me 
POINTS were deducted for this post by Ish OmegaPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
POINTS were deducted for this post by Ish OmegaPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#39
Guest_yippersss
Guest_yippersss
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 03:25 PM
i used to know all the old pokemons from when the tv series first came out, but after that, they keep on increasing, that its just too much to handle... SO I DONT LIKE IT!!!!
#40
Guest_bennijai
Guest_bennijai
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 05:21 PM
it seems to me that the creators are losing ideas as some of the pokemons are quite ugly and bland. i mean remember the first 151 pokemons? they all had their own unique look, but now these pokemons look ridiculous and some makes you go "IS THAT REALLY A NEW POKEMON?"i'm not hating on the new ones as i enjoy the fact that they are still putting new content and expanding the world of pokemon but its getting old real fast.
#41
Guest_dharg
Guest_dharg
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 05:22 PM
i knew the first 150 or so by heart then they came out with a million more omg i quit pokemon
#42
Guest_Spiritcove
Guest_Spiritcove
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 06:23 PM
The new pokemon look less like real animals than the first generation did. Caterpie was just a large caterpillar, Pidgey was an oversized sparrow and Persian was just a cat with a ruby on it's forehead. The current generation of pokemon look very different and perhaps less creative. I don't hate them, but I don't like them either.
#43
gimoro
-
- Member
-
- 553 posts
Dragon
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 28 July 2007 - 06:31 PM
I don't like Pokemon it's ANcient..CuT it out!!!
Ich bin blutloping..Ich brauche deinen Blut.. GIB MIR ES!!!!!!!
HE NEEDS BLOOD NOW.. OR LOPE OUT OF HERE!! BONA PARTE!!
Ps. By loping....]
HE NEEDS BLOOD NOW.. OR LOPE OUT OF HERE!! BONA PARTE!!
Ps. By loping....]
#44
Guest_dzps
Guest_dzps
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 06:34 PM
me think that old one good also!!!!!I like mushtom
#45
--Triforce--
-
- Member
-
- 210 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 28 July 2007 - 06:41 PM
I hate the new pokemons. A proof of this is that I only know Treecko, Mudkip, Rayquaza, Grondon, Deoxys, Bagon, Electryke, Ralts, Zigzagoon, Poochyena, Makuhita, Aron, Taillow, Latios(as), Silcoon and Wurmple from the new gen.
#46
M1551n9n0
-
- Member
-
- 875 posts
Elite Dragon
Reputation: 1
Neutral
Posted 28 July 2007 - 06:42 PM
So do I but I don't go around random boards saying I like cheese.First gen. Pokemon were the best. They looked so cool back then and still do.Second gen. Pokemon was very good. The looks started to taper off but I had no problem with the way they looked. They added an acceptable amount of new Pokemon and I didn't really have a problem. This generation was probably the best generation of them all though.Third gen. OMG! Not only did they try to make the 1st/2nd gen Pokemon cuter, but the new ones started getting uglier and uglier. After that there were so many legendaries and Pikachu look-alikes, it just started getting annoying. I also had a problem with too many Pokemon from past gens. gaining pre-evos/evos.Fourth gen. If they keep on adding ugly, useless Pokemon, I'm gonna stop playing the series altogether. The new Pokemon look horrible. (almost like they ran out of ideas for new Pokemon) Then they added 20 legendaries and hundreds of pre-evos/evos to past generations that didn't really need them.Not only that but has anybody noticed that there are more Pokemon based off of random objects like bells and balloons as opposed to previous generations?I also have an issue with those wierd/useless animations for using items like TM's and Potions. Why can't Nintendo get rid of all these useless animations and use that extra space for something cool like a new region or something like that?I like cheese mmm mmmmmmmm
Artwork: Check it out Facebook fan page. -- deviantART profile
"If you wanna make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make a change"
#47
Guest_ffreak343
Guest_ffreak343
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 06:53 PM
"i aggree with pokemondude, the new pokemons are gay....the old ones were the boom"Again, I didn't realize pixels could be gay. It HAS to be the new technology!!!...seriously, grow up. Pixelated things can't BE gay unless they were programmed to be gay. (My homosexual pixels totally love your male pixels! Doesn't make sense now does it?The original 151 pokemon were, in my opinion, the best. Then the new ones came...then the new ones...Have you seen these things? They're better off adding more monsters into Dragon Warrior...But new pokemon? NO. Pokemon doesn't need any more...After the new 100 pokemon came out, the games, card game, and shows were killed (AGAIN, my opinion).
#48
Guest_Asn856RC
Guest_Asn856RC
-
- Guest
Posted 29 July 2007 - 03:36 PM
most of the new pokemon are ridiculously awkward there are some that seem kind of cool, but do they really need more eevee types i could understand the leaf one but a ice one wtf couldn't the water one already cut it? should've had a rock type instead of ice
#49
Guest_GetWasted
Guest_GetWasted
-
- Guest
Posted 29 July 2007 - 03:44 PM
i like the new 1s there funny
#50
Guest_MingWokBuffet
Guest_MingWokBuffet
-
- Guest
Posted 29 July 2007 - 03:54 PM
The first two gens. were great after that. After that, the Pokemon creators took a page out of the lazy man's book, and just created things that they saw around the room, based the pokemon after the original 151, and other assorted things.But once again, the first two generations were great. I still whip out my Gameboy color and play crystal or gold. (lost my yellow)
