Am i the only person that finds the tom clancey shooters horrible to play.You can be all stealthy and take half an hour to clear an area then get shot once and have to repeat the whole thing!!!ARRRGG waist of money.
Do you prefer normal shooters or tom clancey style
Started by
Guest_dcachia
, Jul 25 2007 10:01 AM
35 replies to this topic
#2
Guest_nekeo
Guest_nekeo
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 02:24 PM
thats not really true when you get kild you know some stuff and then you just make your strategie better and win but gears of war and other shooters are great to
#3
Guest_ElPhezo
Guest_ElPhezo
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 05:26 PM
Games that are half and half are cool if they do it right, if you can at one point be stealthy and clear a room thats cool but if in the same game you can go rambo, thats awesome too
#4
Guest_mcblob
Guest_mcblob
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 06:52 PM
i only have played the ghost recon games and they are very good but it is annoying that only a few shots kill you and there is no way to heal, but there are checkpoints every so often so i like these gamesAm i the only person that finds the tom clancey shooters horrible to play.You can be all stealthy and take half an hour to clear an area then get shot once and have to repeat the whole thing!!!ARRRGG waist of money.
#5
Guest_colorific
Guest_colorific
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 07:41 PM
i like Toom Clancey style shooters because it takes somewhat more strategy than just simply ramboing into 20+ enemiesalthough normal shooters are fun when you want an adrenaline rush lol
#6
Guest_Nageku
Guest_Nageku
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 07:42 PM
I tend to prefer the arcade style shooters. While I like realism as much as the next guy, I'm generally fairly crap at shooters of any kind, so multiple hits and health restores are nice.
#7
Guest_Andreisisu
Guest_Andreisisu
-
- Guest
Posted 25 July 2007 - 07:54 PM
Tom clancey sucks.... Ever game its practicley the same thing 
#8
Guest_h2oloobmx
Guest_h2oloobmx
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 01:12 AM
It is a lot more realistic, and it is harder. If you're just not good at shooters, or life, play the other kind. But if you play Tom Clancy games, you'll get better at the easier ones.
#9
Guest_dcskunk48
Guest_dcskunk48
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 03:20 AM
i sometimes like that its realistic damage, i just dont like how enemies can kill you from across the map like in advanced war fighter
#10
Guest_Halo_Rocket
Guest_Halo_Rocket
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 03:26 AM
I prefer normal shooters. Games like Splinter Cell are extremely stressful, and normal shooters are already stressful enough if you play them on the hardest difficulty. Plus, I'm not a fan of stealth games. Thief, Splinter Cell, they are just stressful and creepy.
#11
Guest_ChickneButt456
Guest_ChickneButt456
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 04:20 AM
I prefer Normal, it is easier for me.
#12
Guest_tacster
Guest_tacster
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 04:35 AM
i prefer halo over tom clancy but thats about it, they are really awesome shooters
#13
Guest_Grunks
Guest_Grunks
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 07:09 PM
Depends what type of mood I am in. The only Clancy game to hold my attention is Splinter Cell. Otherwise i'm all for blasting my way through a game
#14
Guest_mgyhelmut
Guest_mgyhelmut
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 09:08 PM
i prefer normal FPS. i grew up on counterstrike and thats what i like.
#15
Guest_PeacefullAgony80
Guest_PeacefullAgony80
-
- Guest
Posted 26 July 2007 - 10:33 PM
normal shooters, it's easier to move around in. (my opinion)
#16
Guest_McWuggles
Guest_McWuggles
-
- Guest
Posted 27 July 2007 - 02:11 AM
i like tomclancy style...well third person games i think thats gears of war right? well i dont know.anyway i like "third person games" but halo2 online cant be beat even in gears of war
#17
Guest_jamesd54
Guest_jamesd54
-
- Guest
Posted 27 July 2007 - 09:49 PM
The reason tom clanceys games are so hard is so you dont beat them in 1 hour and 30 minuts like halo 2 , making it hard is what makes the game fun so it isnt too easy
#18
Guest_capodecapi
Guest_capodecapi
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 12:40 AM
I HATE TOM CLANCEY GAMES!!!! Their always a big disappointment the software engines are always amazing so graphics get it but thats it wasting ubisoft graphics with those games assasin's creed knows how to put them engines to work 
#19
Guest_aznpro86
Guest_aznpro86
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 02:07 AM
actually i agree with you i like normal shooters over the tom clancey style cause it just doesn't seem right, but i'm still ok with it i just like normal better.
#20
Guest_jamiesibley
Guest_jamiesibley
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2007 - 07:07 AM
Im not a big fan of all the setup involded before each match in clancey style gaming
#21
Slayer56116
-
- Member
-
- 228 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 June 2008 - 02:06 AM
normal, i like not being able to see completely behind me, it makes things more surprising and funner to play with.
#22
Guest_JacKtown General
Guest_JacKtown General
-
- Guest
Posted 03 June 2008 - 03:24 AM
man i bought a gang of tom clancey games n playd da first one n i took the whole stacK bacK to gamestop i hate a few hits n u die
#23
Guest_Mortified
Guest_Mortified
-
- Guest
Posted 03 June 2008 - 03:43 AM
I could never play 3rd person shooters, the camera was too odd for me. Also, Tom Clancy shooters were too tactical, and I got swamped in menus of guns and grenades while people were shooting at me. So I stopped playing them for Halo.
#24
raikogen90
-
- Active Member
-
- 139 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 June 2008 - 05:50 AM
you know i actually like both types. but which one I play when really depends on my mood. Though I will admit that Tom Clancy style shooters frustrate me much faster than regular ones.
Don't forget that your weapon was made by the lowest bidder ...
#25
Guest_#1gameplayer
Guest_#1gameplayer
-
- Guest
Posted 05 June 2008 - 05:31 AM
i like them both, but i prefer normal shooters.
