God real or not?
#2701
Guest_Jounouchi Katsuya
Posted 19 October 2005 - 02:25 AM
#2702
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 19 October 2005 - 02:42 AM
Dinosaurs are mentioned within The Bible, they just aren't referred to as dinosaurs considering that the term was created after The Bible was written. And while there isn't any evidence that proves Gods existance, there isn't any evidence to justify that He doesn't exist. "Pft, there is evidence that He doesn't exist. I can't see him!" And you can't see air, but you believe it is there, right?Unlike what some of the above posters have said, I think that not believing in a divine ruler (be it God, Jaweh, Allah, or whatever entity in question) because it cannot be proven is a fine excuse. There are scientific explanations for much of the world's being, and a lot of religious material is contradicted by scientific findings (eg dinosaurs, which are not mentioned in any religious texts I have read). Sure, you can claim that the divine being placed these here as part of its divine plan, but what would that accomplish? The deity would have more followers if there weren't evidence against its existence.To clarify another issue, I do 'believe' in Jesus. I believe he was a carpenter born in the middle east around 2000 years ago. I just don't believe he had any divine significance.
Time is just a standard set that is determined by a planets revolving around the sun and by its revolving on its axis. So yeah, there really isn't any way to determine time outside of the universe, which may mean that time is a concept exclusive to this universe.and time is all relative if you are talking dinosaurs.. a day could be millions of years in Gods eyes
Edited by kemutsemu, 19 October 2005 - 02:46 AM.
#2703
Guest_nessmann
Posted 19 October 2005 - 02:43 AM
yes i dont like it when people do that. and televangalists make me mad though i believe strongly in godI personally do not believe in god but don't mind people whodo.Unless or course they pressure me into their religion.
#2704
Guest_rx-78-2
Posted 19 October 2005 - 04:13 AM
Edited by rx-78-2, 19 October 2005 - 04:35 AM.
#2705
Guest_discostu54
Posted 19 October 2005 - 06:42 AM
I understand religions clearly, and to refute your argument about knowledge of dinosaurs not being accessible 1500 years ago when the bible was written, Western Civilization did not know that the Americas existed 1500 years ago. Should we ignore discoveries and still pretend they don't exist?"No one would know what does that divine plan is about..." if I interpreted that correctly, that means that no religion is definite. Since no priests/ministers/clergymen preaching a specific religion have ever died, all religion is based on conjecture. Sure, some people may be right, but they might not. Nobody knows for sure.As for an example of evidence, I was simply referring to geology and prehistory that we have knowledge of now. A lot of the bible is based around that culture, as you said; cultures change. It's not acceptable by society's standards to cut off the hands of a thief if he steals anymore. There's a lot in religous text that isn't really applicable.Well...to tell you about the dinnosaurs....in that period..I think they did know nothing about the dinnosaurs....and the bible was finished like 1500 years ago...so...No one would know what does that divine plan is about...(If God told you...my mistake..) until we go to the heaven..."deity would have more followers if there weren't evidence against its existence."Of which evidence are you talking about? give an example please...remember, the bible was written in an other period and culture...And finally...you believe in a Jesus...that just was a carpenteer? (actually he wasn't, he learned from his dad, Jose(don't know the translation), that was one ). Jesus had a divine significance...he was the sun of God, God as a human....living all the tentations we have, suffering all we suffer and finally dying as we die, like humans...but he resucited 3 days later of his dead not as a human can do...Only that...please ask I you don't understand something about the catholic religion (that can be answerd by a human, you know what I mean), somebody will answer you
give me a chemical formula for God, and you'll have me satisfied. Also, referring to the dinosaurs, it depends on how you interpret the Bible. A lot of the bible is metaphorical, but is sometimes taken literally. The number 40, for example, is an allusion to an unmeasurable amount of time. Wandering the desert for 40 years, 40 days and 40 nights...it comes up a lot in the bible. Logically, the bible could incorporate everything that geology has disproven about it metaphorically. However, that could also prove that the Bible is just science put into poetic forms.Sorry if this is just babbling and making no sense. I tend to do that."Pft, there is evidence that He doesn't exist. I can't see him!" And you can't see air, but you believe it is there, right?
Edited by discostu54, 19 October 2005 - 06:48 AM.
#2706
Guest_Erachima
Posted 19 October 2005 - 09:23 AM
#2707
Guest_eygammer
Posted 19 October 2005 - 09:00 PM
#2708
Guest_MajinBror
Posted 19 October 2005 - 09:12 PM
#2709
Guest_Missing
Posted 19 October 2005 - 09:48 PM
??????-->God there you have....how can you ask for a chemical formula of God?! Why is it so difficult to believe in something so simple and so complicated at the same time? 40 is the number of preparation, just sayingScience into poetic forms? which kind of science is see Jesus dying?I understand religions clearly, and to refute your argument about knowledge of dinosaurs not being accessible 1500 years ago when the bible was written, Western Civilization did not know that the Americas existed 1500 years ago. Should we ignore discoveries and still pretend they don't exist?"No one would know what does that divine plan is about..." if I interpreted that correctly, that means that no religion is definite. Since no priests/ministers/clergymen preaching a specific religion have ever died, all religion is based on conjecture. Sure, some people may be right, but they might not. Nobody knows for sure.As for an example of evidence, I was simply referring to geology and prehistory that we have knowledge of now. A lot of the bible is based around that culture, as you said; cultures change. It's not acceptable by society's standards to cut off the hands of a thief if he steals anymore. There's a lot in religous text that isn't really applicable.Well...to tell you about the dinnosaurs....in that period..I think they did know nothing about the dinnosaurs....and the bible was finished like 1500 years ago...so...No one would know what does that divine plan is about...(If God told you...my mistake..) until we go to the heaven..."deity would have more followers if there weren't evidence against its existence."Of which evidence are you talking about? give an example please...remember, the bible was written in an other period and culture...And finally...you believe in a Jesus...that just was a carpenteer? (actually he wasn't, he learned from his dad, Jose(don't know the translation), that was one ). Jesus had a divine significance...he was the sun of God, God as a human....living all the tentations we have, suffering all we suffer and finally dying as we die, like humans...but he resucited 3 days later of his dead not as a human can do...Only that...please ask I you don't understand something about the catholic religion (that can be answerd by a human, you know what I mean), somebody will answer you
give me a chemical formula for God, and you'll have me satisfied. Also, referring to the dinosaurs, it depends on how you interpret the Bible. A lot of the bible is metaphorical, but is sometimes taken literally. The number 40, for example, is an allusion to an unmeasurable amount of time. Wandering the desert for 40 years, 40 days and 40 nights...it comes up a lot in the bible. Logically, the bible could incorporate everything that geology has disproven about it metaphorically. However, that could also prove that the Bible is just science put into poetic forms.Sorry if this is just babbling and making no sense. I tend to do that."Pft, there is evidence that He doesn't exist. I can't see him!" And you can't see air, but you believe it is there, right?
#2710
Guest_Hypershell
Posted 19 October 2005 - 10:14 PM
Edited by Hypershell, 19 October 2005 - 10:15 PM.
#2711
Guest_discostu54
Posted 19 October 2005 - 10:15 PM
I was kidding about the chemical formula for God; it's what I like to call a 'joke'. I'm sorry if you don't believe in jokes, but I'll respect that and leave you to debate their existence, just as I am debating the existence of a God.As for science into poetic forms, think about it. There are light "waves", "black holes", magnetic "fields"...are any of these things really the things they say they are? Light waves share little in common with the undulating waves of the ocean, a "black hole" is still not entirely understandable, but there's a chance that it is neither black nor a hole, and magnetic fields have no resemblance to the corn fields I see in farms. It's really however you interpret it. When the bible uses the number "40", I don't interpret it literally, for example. The "garden of eden" could just be an archetype, not representing an actual garden but rather a sort of paradise.As for the science of Jesus dying, most people would die after being crucified. I'm not sure if I understood that question fully. Anyways, it's entirely up to interpretation. I could claim that there is a god, and that it is a cheese sandwich, and that the Earth is a piece of god fallen from the original sandwich, with bread forming the land and cheese forming the oceans. It all depends on how you see the world around you. I, personally, do not see the world as something that was created by any being or human incarnation of this being. If I had been brought up differently or had a different thought process, maybe I'd see it from a Christian point of view. Until then, I'm happy to hear people's arguments??????-->God there you have....how can you ask for a chemical formula of God?! Why is it so difficult to believe in something so simple and so complicated at the same time? 40 is the number of preparation, just sayingScience into poetic forms? which kind of science is see Jesus dying?
Once again, I curse the internet for its inability to convey sarcasm.asking for the chemical formula for God is like asking for a binary code for the human body...
Edited by discostu54, 19 October 2005 - 10:16 PM.
#2712
Guest_Missing
Posted 20 October 2005 - 12:02 AM
#2713
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 20 October 2005 - 05:25 AM
Edited by aoiblue, 20 October 2005 - 05:51 AM.
#2714
Guest_discostu54
Posted 20 October 2005 - 06:29 AM
Edited by discostu54, 20 October 2005 - 06:31 AM.
#2715
Guest_Erachima
Posted 20 October 2005 - 10:52 AM
Perfection is a single state, an ultimate, ideal state from which nothing can possibly get better. It cannot contain any flaws whatsoever, and no matter how you slice it, evil is a flawed idea. So evil has no place in perfection.i think there is a god but i dont think he is pure good or pure evil... if he really is a GOD then he must possess both those traits.... i mean he cant be all good or just all bad... After all, evil is half of a perfect sphere...
#2716
Guest_nehe32
Posted 20 October 2005 - 10:55 AM
#2717
Guest_AJChau
Posted 20 October 2005 - 10:56 AM
#2718
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 21 October 2005 - 05:30 AM
your all going to burn in hell because you dont beleive in god and he will send you to hell where you will burn in hell and be raped by demons
... You two = N00bs... What you have just said is a good example of what most people think of when they hear the word "Christian." I'm a Christian and everything, but don't be so suprised if you get warned a few times for what you said.you dont believe in him well your screwed bye bye
Good and evil are traits of human nature and God's not a human. He is absolute, He is just, but most of all He's freaking neutral.i think there is a god but i dont think he is pure good or pure evil... if he really is a GOD then he must possess both those traits.... i mean he cant be all good or just all bad... After all, evil is half of a perfect sphere..
#2719
Guest_alden666
Posted 21 October 2005 - 10:25 AM
Edited by alden666, 21 October 2005 - 10:26 AM.
#2720
Guest_Missing
Posted 22 October 2005 - 05:13 AM
silly humans? are you talking about his best creation? If he had some things more imnportant to do, then why did he appeared as a human to save us....I mean, God, Jesus, gave his life for us...silly humans...If he died for saving us...aren't we a little important for him...I think yesI think there is a god but i dont think he cares about beings like us.. i mean i think He/She hav mor important things to do than helping silly humans like yourself.... any way, thats just an opinion. Where the hell did you get the idea that evil is a flawed idea. Assuming it is, then so does the idea of good.Yes, good and evil are traits of a human being but somewhere along the line it had to come from god after all he is the source of all things. Im beginning to consider that god and the devil may be a the same but different entities. And when i said that evil is part of a perfect sphere, i idnt mean it literally. I just cant explain it in the correct terms.
#2721
Posted 22 October 2005 - 06:00 AM
#2722
Guest_Kipu2021
Posted 22 October 2005 - 11:26 PM
#2723
Guest_Cest le Rincewind
Posted 23 October 2005 - 02:53 AM
Okay, screw you, they haven't proven it. You shouldn't believe everything you see on TV.Yes they have proven that it was right/true. It was something the found that was the last piece of the puzzle and they have proven it right... i saw a science program about it and they said it and showed it.
#2724
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 23 October 2005 - 05:23 AM
So, when one within the community has become a danger to himself and may endanger the rest of the community, he should be allowed to stay within the community despite the fact that he will bring about more and more problems? When one person falls short, remove him until he is fit to re-enter the community. This is what just retribution does, but more than often, those that have been re-educated will revert to their old selves and re-establish themselves as a danger to the community. I see Hell as a prison and I see those that refute their ways within Hell as prisoners who will be released back into the community sooner or later. But once they are released into the gates of heaven, sin takes its leave as religion does. Meaning that those that have refuted sin are no longer capable of crime. Would anyone care to tell me where God or Jesus himself says that He eternally comdemns souls to Hell?If you all think that non believers in a higher being will be condemned to an area of "Hell," That makes little to no sense! I mean really now... I thought you all said you had a loving god. No riteous deity would ever do that. Think about it, The Bible (in perspective) is just a good fiction book. Nobody can prove god, and nobody can disprove god. Science fills in the blanks that the Bible creates and the Bible fills in for all the gaps that Science has! Can't we all just get along??
Edited by kemutsemu, 23 October 2005 - 05:28 AM.
#2725
Guest_Missing
Posted 23 October 2005 - 05:49 AM








