God real or not?
#2876
Guest_Seish
Posted 08 January 2006 - 12:35 AM
#2877
Guest_SENOR NACHO
Posted 08 January 2006 - 01:23 AM
#2878
Guest_Anunaki
Posted 08 January 2006 - 01:27 AM
#2879
Guest_deadman2k4
Posted 08 January 2006 - 02:22 AM
#2880
Guest_peasant_mimiru
Posted 08 January 2006 - 04:32 AM
Edited by peasant_mimiru, 08 January 2006 - 04:33 AM.
#2881
Guest_Apoc321
Posted 08 January 2006 - 10:58 PM
That is the best sum up I've ever seen! I'm prouldy christian, and therefore beleive in god and heaven and hell. And only one religion is the right one, right? So it could be some minute one in the middle of Asia for all I know. But even if thats true, it feels right for me to worship god, for you it could be different.If you're Muslim... then you should believe in a God. Or at least Allah. Or some person/dude like that. I think I can offer a reason why God doesn't exist. But that doesn't prove that I don't believe in *something*. Just not God.
. Okay. 1. Everyone goes to hell, because some religions say that if you aren't part of their religion you go to hell. So everyone goes to hell.2. If everyone goes to hell. There is no such thing as heaven. Unless it's like some teacher's lounge thing that only God and his Saints go to. Or some other idiotic reason. But everyone is equall. Or so said by the Muslims and Sikhs.3. If there is no good, there is no bad. Everything must be balanced or we will all be plunged into chaos. And I mean real chaos. Not war in Middle East / Stupid G.Bush crap.4. If there is no good, there is no God. For God is the embodiment of good. So there. God does not exist. 5. All Holy Books are written by people, PEOPLE. Honestly, do you think God's gonna spend his time writing a 500 pg+ book that tells us what to do and what to believe? And Holy Books are just to explain how this world works.Conclusion: God does not exist. BUT, that does not mean that there is an universal being that is both good and bad. Also, there can be aspects of the universal being (yea I'm leaning way towards Hinduism, even if I'm not one
) But God cannot be an aspect. God's purpose is to watch over us. His opposite is the Devil. The Devil is to watch over Hell. If Hell does not exist, the Devil does not exist, therefore God does not exist.
#2882
Guest_Djmix2006
Posted 08 January 2006 - 11:04 PM
Edited by Djmix2006, 08 January 2006 - 11:05 PM.
#2883
Guest_Hideyori
Posted 08 January 2006 - 11:23 PM
#2884
Guest_Repo_Man
Posted 09 January 2006 - 01:13 AM
Wow.. That's just mind blowing. I couldn't do that. I've pretended to like some of the presents my parents got me, to make them happy.. But believing if Someone is real or not is just too large a prospect for me to be anything but sincere about. For their sakes, and if not for your own, you should tell them how you really feel. Right or wrong as it is in their eyes.And for all you other people on here who don't believe in the reality of God and His power: There's coming a day when we're going to be leaving. Called away to a heavenly home. But it's going to take more than just believing. You've got to keep your eyes on Jesus and leave this whole world alone.i dont belive in god i just pretend to just to keep my parents happy
#2885
Guest_peasant_mimiru
Posted 09 January 2006 - 01:22 AM
#2886
Guest_SENOR NACHO
Posted 09 January 2006 - 01:27 AM
Edited by SENOR NACHO, 09 January 2006 - 01:28 AM.
#2887
Guest_peasant_mimiru
Posted 09 January 2006 - 02:05 AM
Okay, if there is no hell, how can there be heaven? I mean come on, people should know that everything must be balanced. That's why there is such thing as a Devil? There has to be counteraspects. What you just said proves what I said.all those people who say were gonna go to hell because people dont beleive in god are wrong. god is a superior being and thus should not expect any thing of us. why create a hell for people to rot in if god himself created those bad thing for people to do. thus there should be no hell. but as for everything else, god, if he does exist, must have created somewhere for people to go after they die. they could be reincarnated over and over, or they could go to heaven, noone knows. and as to there being only one right religion, that too is wrong. all religions hold a key aspect of god, but that doesnt mean its the only one who holds it. for all we know all religions could be half right and half wrong. religion isnt something thats right and wrong, its peoples beliefs so they cant be right or wrong because people will still beleive in them even if they are proven to a different religon.
#2888
Guest_poopyhead25
Posted 09 January 2006 - 02:08 AM
#2889
Guest_Hideyori
Posted 09 January 2006 - 02:31 AM
Uhm...I'm slightly confused here...how does that relate to my post? My post was in response to another post saying that if you don't believe in God, you're going to Hell. You cannot go to a place you do not believe in...This is why I hate my own religion....*Sigh* It never ends...Hell is where GOD throws nonbelivers and sinners.There is an Old saying"Hell is GOD's garbage can. Make sure you are not His Garbage.If you don't believe in God, how could you go to Hell, a place that God Himself created?
#2890
Guest_SENOR NACHO
Posted 09 January 2006 - 03:02 AM
but why must there be constant balance. there is always balance and imbalance for example, god and the devil are not equals, for god must have created the devil meaning the balance falls more towards godOkay, if there is no hell, how can there be heaven? I mean come on, people should know that everything must be balanced. That's why there is such thing as a Devil?all those people who say were gonna go to hell because people dont beleive in god are wrong. god is a superior being and thus should not expect any thing of us. why create a hell for people to rot in if god himself created those bad thing for people to do. thus there should be no hell. but as for everything else, god, if he does exist, must have created somewhere for people to go after they die. they could be reincarnated over and over, or they could go to heaven, noone knows. and as to there being only one right religion, that too is wrong. all religions hold a key aspect of god, but that doesnt mean its the only one who holds it. for all we know all religions could be half right and half wrong. religion isnt something thats right and wrong, its peoples beliefs so they cant be right or wrong because people will still beleive in them even if they are proven to a different religon.
#2891
Guest_sportscamp
Posted 09 January 2006 - 06:18 AM
#2892
Guest_zoloft
Posted 09 January 2006 - 06:49 AM
It's also worth noting that Pope John Paul II put out a statement saying that evolution and Christianity to not conflict with each other.Evolution: RealGod: Also RealThe two can coincide so long as you don't take every word in the bible at literal face value. Also, read Finding Darwin's God by Kenneth Miller. Poor creationists and intelligent designists got whipped in that book.
#2893
Guest_Jabu
Posted 09 January 2006 - 02:26 PM
#2894
Guest_ferr
Posted 09 January 2006 - 03:21 PM
Edited by ferr, 09 January 2006 - 03:32 PM.
#2895
Guest_MichahSimmons
Posted 09 January 2006 - 10:48 PM
basically every statement within your post is based upon both illogical, and, I am sorry, yet at the same time content, to say incorrect presuppositions. First, you have misrepresented the question altogether, choosing to present "God" as the religions of today would have you believe, thus enacting the straw-man and red-herring fallacy at the same time, first arguing a point which is not even the subject and secondly taking that point out of ITS context to defeat it for your own benefit. Your first point, time, is completely foundless, as it only points out the average human's ignorance, actually supported by your later point of "belief", showing that when we try to define such a being or its attributes we limit ourselves to our own understandings of physics, or the sciences in general (which have changed over the years). Of course if there were a being such as God he would not be limited to our understanding of science...if he were, he would not be such a being! Your next point follows the same characteristic, assuming that if there is such a being it must be conceivable. The bible itself attests against this, giving examples of people not being able to see God!!! (because they are incapable of conceiving him) Your last point, religions, is completely rediculous; are we to judge Plato by his followers?? or Marx's theories by those who follow them??? Of course not... Likewise, we cannot judge God by denominations who can never even hope to fully understand his entity themselves in the first place. Oh yeah, the point about God not being good...wow. My advice--read the bible and then say that. The explanation of God's unbounding love would take too long, but i can sum most of it up in one word: choice. God loved us so much he gave us a choice. He knows which one we'll make, but he will still allow us to make it because he loves us.Due to the omnipotence paradox (If God is all powerful, can he create a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it), the temporality paradox (if God came after the existence of time, then he is restrained by time and not omnipotent, nor is he a first-caused-cause entity; considering God came "before" time is an impossibility as being "before" something would require temportality) which also defeats the cosmological argument; the failure of the ontological argument (which states that if God is omnipotent then to imagine such a being would require the belief that this entity must exist, since the property of existence is an attachment of a greater being, but fails when it is realized that this Greatest Conceivable Being is actually inconceivable due to the fact that it lacks a required attribute, existence, which is similar to attempting to conceive of a three-headed dragon when you can only conceive of one-headed dragons, you simply cannot conceive of such a thing and it is inconceivable); multi-religious societies that conflict with varying denominations and beliefs; the Problem of Evil (which states that if God is truly omni-benevolent then it can never let any sort of "evil" occur, and since it is omnipotent it must always do anything it can to prevent "evil" otherwise it is corrupt and defies the definition of God), etc, etc. It would seem that God, as it is defined, cannot exist.
#2896
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 10 January 2006 - 12:23 AM
1. He cannot lift it should He hold Himself to it (I.E.; He hasn't wiped us all out yet because He is holding Himself to it). 2. God created time and therefore defies it because He isn't constrained to it. 3. God cannot commit evil, but will allow evil to exist so that humanity will learn it's lesson. Good try dear sir.Due to the omnipotence paradox (If God is all powerful, can he create a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it), the temporality paradox (if God came after the existence of time, then he is restrained by time and not omnipotent, nor is he a first-caused-cause entity; considering God came "before" time is an impossibility as being "before" something would require temportality) which also defeats the cosmological argument; the failure of the ontological argument (which states that if God is omnipotent then to imagine such a being would require the belief that this entity must exist, since the property of existence is an attachment of a greater being, but fails when it is realized that this Greatest Conceivable Being is actually inconceivable due to the fact that it lacks a required attribute, existence, which is similar to attempting to conceive of a three-headed dragon when you can only conceive of one-headed dragons, you simply cannot conceive of such a thing and it is inconceivable); multi-religious societies that conflict with varying denominations and beliefs; the Problem of Evil (which states that if God is truly omni-benevolent then it can never let any sort of "evil" occur, and since it is omnipotent it must always do anything it can to prevent "evil" otherwise it is corrupt and defies the definition of God), etc, etc. It would seem that God, as it is defined, cannot exist.
#2897
Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:04 AM
Edited by The Foo Foo bunny Rriders, 10 January 2006 - 01:10 AM.


"A boy has the right to dream. There are endless possibilities stretched out before him. What awaits him down the path, he will then have to choose. The boy doesn't always know. At some point, the boy then becomes an adult, and learns what he was able to become. Joy and sadness forever will accompany this. He is confronted with a choice. When this happens, does he bid his past farewell in his heart? Once a boy becomes an adult, he can no longer go back to being a boy. The boy is now a man. Only one thing can be said. A boy has the right to dream. For those endless possibilities are stretched out before him. We must remember. All men were once boys."
#2898
Guest_zoloft
Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:15 AM
Why make an exception for your bipolar God?...so according to my interrupatation God can commit Evil
Edited by zoloft, 10 January 2006 - 01:17 AM.
#2899
Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:35 AM
Edited by The Foo Foo bunny Rriders, 10 January 2006 - 02:04 AM.


"A boy has the right to dream. There are endless possibilities stretched out before him. What awaits him down the path, he will then have to choose. The boy doesn't always know. At some point, the boy then becomes an adult, and learns what he was able to become. Joy and sadness forever will accompany this. He is confronted with a choice. When this happens, does he bid his past farewell in his heart? Once a boy becomes an adult, he can no longer go back to being a boy. The boy is now a man. Only one thing can be said. A boy has the right to dream. For those endless possibilities are stretched out before him. We must remember. All men were once boys."
#2900
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:41 AM










