Two wrongs don't make a right. I appreciate your assumption that I'm a retard and need you to condescend.sorry I must have confuse you some were What I was trying to say is that God can commit act of evil as the definition stated being destructive, inhumane, or wicked but he only have done this toward those he deemed wicked like the city Sodom and Gomorrah thus why he wipe them out, another example is when moses ask pharoh to let his people go and every time he refuse God would send an destructive, inhumane, or wicked plage., but if you read the story of Job the devil Ask that God to case great evil toward Job to see if he will curse him in the face, But God refused, saying that he can't cause evil to those he deem rightoues or good. Thus showing he's not biapolor... To make it simple for you to understand ....When a child misbehave the parent punish the child for being bad (causing evil toward the child) but when the child is good the parent reward the child for being good (thus not causing evil toward the child because he/she was good). God work in a simaler manner be wicked and don't follow his commends bad things will happen but do the opposite good this will happen... but keep this in mind this was according to the biblical times as it mention in revealtion God had remove his hands from the world and let it chose it own path (like a child going of to college and chosing his/her own life A. either follower their own choice or B. follow the instruction that the parent give them) .... Sorry if I made it sound contridictory in my earlier statements if I'm still confusing you keep posting till I can give you a non-confusing satified answerOfftopic@Jon Kim- your an idiot
God real or not?
#2901
Guest_zoloft
Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:43 AM
#2902
Guest_requIEMrx
Posted 10 January 2006 - 02:14 AM
Edited by requIEMrx, 10 January 2006 - 02:22 AM.
#2903
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:38 AM
ummm I never said he was evil, Man I wish people like you at least attemp to read the post before you talk or writing to me (because in the end your just stating how stupid you really are), One I said he capable of commiting evil, in the sense that the definition of evil stated being destructive, inhumane, or wicked often refer to someone dieing or put to death as end result toward something or person. this does not mean the person has to be evil to be evil, example i killed your mother... what the my punishment, what the wicked, destructive, inhumane, punishment you can think of.... hmmm oh death sounds like our answer for wy wicked deeds but that would make you evil thus you must die for killing me and so ....see even if you did punish me with the penety of death that does not make you as a person evil because you did evil toward another person... it often the reason that make the person evil, if the person who just go around killing people moms yes he's evil, but if a person put that person to death he not evil he a good guy even he commited evil..... so sleep on that stupid fool.Ps don't you ever tell me what to sleep on, second read a person entire post before you go out sound like a fool stupid noob third don't you ever spell my name wrong again and address to me with your stupidity again, you stupid fool.... :rant:btw gandamds God isn't evil, do you think eliminating evil is evil? most people would think elimination and eradication of all those evil would be a good thing, God can't be evil because he eliminates evil and tries to prevent evil, evil is created by peoples and the angels freewill that God also created, so think about what you say read the passage of Sodom and Gommorah again. btw the word sodomy (to have sexual intercourse with animals, gross...) comes from Sodom. freewill is what led to Lucifers change of heart and Lucifer, now called Satan (accuser), brought sin into the world. so think about this when you go to sleep.that's something to think about eh?God rocks your socks!!!
Edited by The Foo Foo bunny Rriders, 10 January 2006 - 06:06 AM.


"A boy has the right to dream. There are endless possibilities stretched out before him. What awaits him down the path, he will then have to choose. The boy doesn't always know. At some point, the boy then becomes an adult, and learns what he was able to become. Joy and sadness forever will accompany this. He is confronted with a choice. When this happens, does he bid his past farewell in his heart? Once a boy becomes an adult, he can no longer go back to being a boy. The boy is now a man. Only one thing can be said. A boy has the right to dream. For those endless possibilities are stretched out before him. We must remember. All men were once boys."
#2904
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:59 AM
Except you know, we don't actaully worship her, we jsut put some more emphasis on her and la la virgin guadelupe than other religions. So nice try, stick to your religion and he'll stick to hismettax catholic christianity is totally wrong because they worship mary, mother of jesus, this is disobeying one of the ten commandments, thou shall worship me and only me. so if ive reached you, give up catholicism and become a presbytarian
3DS FC: 4983-5096-5352
PSN ID: MightyTM24
Steam ID: Tm24
#2905
Guest_zoloft
Posted 10 January 2006 - 06:38 AM
#2906
Guest_ferr
Posted 10 January 2006 - 04:33 PM
Edited by ferr, 10 January 2006 - 04:34 PM.
#2907
Guest_Locue
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:21 PM
Personally I believe he, she, the, it granted us the choice of a free will, but it also depends on which God you mean, because the Old Testament God was a real ***** (do remember that a human ***** can be both male and female) and wouldn't allow any sort of free will (hence no option to be bad really) and the New Testament was nice and cuddly-wuddly (hence a lot of options to be anything, as long as you could regret it if you did a bad thing).... the belief that God granted us "choice" to commit evil.
More importantly; God will know the exact time of date and the exact stroke (no upcoming pun intended) of the clock we will engage in sexual intercourse! That's sexual harassment, God. I'm getting a restrainment order and it don't matter how hot you are, oh Heavenly one.But the part where my thinking came in was, if God is omniscient, then God knows of our choices before our existence.. God knows 80 years beforehand whether we will mow the lawn on a Saturday afternoon or not, and he also knows if we plan to commit what we consider to be crimes.
Dude, go public with that theory. Media isn't the cause of violence! God is! Freaking awesome!With this lack of free will, shouldn't it be considered that all "evil" outcomes are committed by God indirectly, in almost the same sense that a parent should be held responsible for a child acquiring a gun in the house and killing a person on accident, only difference is the parent would know beforehand that their child would commit this act.
There is no evil, no good, no right and no wrong. There's one the grave matter of who will mow the freaking lawn on Saturday.My final line is that "evil" is subjective, imo, but what do you think?
Edited by Locue, 10 January 2006 - 05:21 PM.
#2908
Guest_saxgirl_ar
Posted 10 January 2006 - 06:59 PM
#2909
Guest_Repo_Man
Posted 10 January 2006 - 07:22 PM
#2910
Guest_Repo_Man
Posted 10 January 2006 - 08:20 PM
A child is but a child who will do as it bids. If the child knows the danger of the gun, and still took it and slew someone, is it really an accident? A child does things without thinking of the ramifications of his/her actions and such is innocent. The guilt only lays in the fact that the parent may not of made clear the danger of the gun. But, the danger should of been clear to the child as he was only drawn to it as he saw on the television/movie people using them to slay their enemy. Now, with this in mind, God did warn the child of the danger of sin. In Eden, did he not say "If you eat of this fruit you shall surely die."? Knowledge of good and evil is a weighty thing. Yet we all have it. And we either act upon the knowledge of good, or the knowledge of evil. If a parent gives his child all the love and warnings in the world, yet the child still becomes a serial killer, are the parents to blame?I've never really liked the Problem Of Evil argument very much, I was just giving it as an example of what many believe as being contradictory to God's existence. I feel that "evil" is subjective in the same sense that Socrates once spoke of, "What is holy and why is it holy, are holy things holy because God treats them as being holy, and simply based on that reason alone. If God did not treat them as holy then would something else be holy instead?"The first response to my post did mention something that reminded me of something, the belief that God granted us "choice" to commit evil. But the part where my thinking came in was, if God is omniscient, then God knows of our choices before our existence.. God knows 80 years beforehand whether we will mow the lawn on a Saturday afternoon or not, and he also knows if we plan to commit what we consider to be crimes. With this lack of free will, shouldn't it be considered that all "evil" outcomes are committed by God indirectly, in almost the same sense that a parent should be held responsible for a child acquiring a gun in the house and killing a person on accident, only difference is the parent would know beforehand that their child would commit this act.My final line is that "evil" is subjective, imo, but what do you think?
#2911
Guest_chenergy
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:45 AM
#2912
Guest_SENOR NACHO
Posted 11 January 2006 - 01:14 AM
#2913
Guest_Balewolf
Posted 11 January 2006 - 02:56 AM
#2914
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 11 January 2006 - 03:19 AM
Meh, we have free will, it's just that what we do is set in stone. God simply knows and we simply act. And although God knows all of our actions, He is not the one to commit them. He simply knows that they are coming and he will not intervene. Why, you ask? Because everyone shall, whether they like it or not, recieve responsibility and retribution for their actions. The Biblical view on free will is that we have the ability to choose Him or choose the world. Tell me, if you kill someone, who is responsible? You or God?I've never really liked the Problem Of Evil argument very much, I was just giving it as an example of what many believe as being contradictory to God's existence. I feel that "evil" is subjective in the same sense that Socrates once spoke of, "What is holy and why is it holy, are holy things holy because God treats them as being holy, and simply based on that reason alone. If God did not treat them as holy then would something else be holy instead?"The first response to my post did mention something that reminded me of something, the belief that God granted us "choice" to commit evil. But the part where my thinking came in was, if God is omniscient, then God knows of our choices before our existence.. God knows 80 years beforehand whether we will mow the lawn on a Saturday afternoon or not, and he also knows if we plan to commit what we consider to be crimes. With this lack of free will, shouldn't it be considered that all "evil" outcomes are committed by God indirectly, in almost the same sense that a parent should be held responsible for a child acquiring a gun in the house and killing a person on accident, only difference is the parent would know beforehand that their child would commit this act.My final line is that "evil" is subjective, imo, but what do you think?
Edited by kemutsemu, 11 January 2006 - 03:44 AM.
#2915
Guest_cale6281
Posted 11 January 2006 - 04:21 AM
#2916
Guest_exos22
Posted 11 January 2006 - 04:58 AM
#2917
Guest_Jabu
Posted 11 January 2006 - 01:23 PM
The whole Virgin Mary issue with catholicism is her increased status and the increasing attempts by Roman Catholic clergy to equate her wih Jesus( in the sense of receiving salvation). Jesus is "the way the truth and the life, no one comes unto the father but through me" . The Virgin Mary's status is being increased and that is most definitely wrong. If you want it I can hit you with a deluge of information concerning the increased deification of the Virgin Mary. It's a very troubling thing for the Roman Catholic Church to be doing. Perhaps that is why he asked him to leave Roman Catholicism.Except you know, we don't actaully worship her, we jsut put some more emphasis on her and la la virgin guadelupe than other religions. So nice try, stick to your religion and he'll stick to hismettax catholic christianity is totally wrong because they worship mary, mother of jesus, this is disobeying one of the ten commandments, thou shall worship me and only me. so if ive reached you, give up catholicism and become a presbytarian
#2918
Guest_jonno_coleman100
Posted 12 January 2006 - 07:15 AM
#2919
Guest_Repo_Man
Posted 12 January 2006 - 05:50 PM
That's something like saying if people suddenly believed that airplanes couldn't fly anymore, they wouldn't. However they only wouldn't be able to fly because people stopped flying them, meanwhile their engineering is sound.It's been said that the devil's cruelest trick is to make people think he dosen't exist. Just some food for thought I guess.My thought is that God exists because people believe in him. If everyone in the world suddennly didnt believe in god anymore, he wouldnt exist.
#2920
Guest_bebeonmars
Posted 12 January 2006 - 11:58 PM
#2921
Guest_RichardCranium
Posted 13 January 2006 - 02:02 AM
#2922
Guest_Kem the Logician
Posted 13 January 2006 - 03:29 AM
So if we all believed that air wasn't necessary to our wellbeing, we wouldn't have to breathe? Wow... That's some idiotic logic you've got there.My thought is that God exists because people believe in him. If everyone in the world suddennly didnt believe in god anymore, he wouldnt exist.
#2923
Guest_glenn69
Posted 13 January 2006 - 04:34 AM
#2924
Guest_moo_moo_cow
Posted 13 January 2006 - 06:59 PM
#2925
Guest_synalo
Posted 18 January 2006 - 12:56 PM










