[quote name='axyarthur' date='Mar 19 2006, 08:36 PM' post='1160243']i think the idea of God is a human creation. Let's for a moment imagine that humans never existed. Would the universe still be there? I don't see why not. After all, the earth and solar system is only a tiny part of the universe. If we do believe that God created the universe, this God must be far more distant than most religions think he is. Another question that i want to raise to that why do we assign the human pronoun "he" to God? Isn't it a little bit arrogant for us to assume that the creator of the universe has human attributes? Compare to the rest of the universe, humans are so insignificant. It goes back to the idea that if humans never existed, there will still be planets and stars in the universe. God is a way for humans to understand the universe and ourselves. As for me, i don't believe that there is a God, but I understand why other people do, and I see nothing wrong with such a belief, so it is very human.[/quote]God being distant - Because God is spiritual and omnipresent (everywhere), He is not distant. If we were to use a human word to describe God's size, it would be 'big'. But God isn't really big or small, He is just everywhere. He created a huge universe because He could, but He also decided to create and relate to humans on a tiny, tiny planet, also because He could.We call Him He because males, although not better than females, are more powerful in terms of physical strength. Again, do NOT think I just said males are better, because the genders are equal. But humans describe God as He reveals Himself and as they experience Him. We describe God as well as we know Him, and we only understand attributes that humans share with Him. Remember, if God created everything, we are not assigning Him OUR attributes, we are the ones possessing some of HIS attributes or at least describing Him according to attributes He created.It is not that God is male, but that He has revealed Himself with male characteristics, such as might. Females have different plus points, like sensitivity (males don't like it, but sensitivity is a good quality to have) and intelligence (girls perform better in school), which God also possesses but are not primarily how He reveals Himself. Ultimately, gender does not matter when talking about God. I don't agree with calling God She (because of the CONCEPT of the stronger sex), but you can if you want to. He isn't offended and neither should Christians be offended, unless somebody worshiped the IDEA of a goddess and/or the femininity itself (the problem with paganism) instead of the PERSON of God. If a 'Christian' worship the attributes of God, such as apparent masculinity, they are just as bad as the pagan worshiping femininity. The most important thing is to use a personal pronoun of some kind because God is personal. He is not an 'it' (though many wish and act like He is).[quote name='mittortz' date='Mar 21 2006, 06:22 PM' post='1168285']As an atheist, I find it...odd/interesting that your attitude towards atheists is that you are one who is enlightened and they are the ones who are not. If that sounds like I'm analyzing you wrong, please forgive me, but I would just like to know how you can make "very good points" to support religion. Mangekyou gives only a few reasons as to why it is ridiculous to believe in God. The only things I have heard from a religios person is "How do you expain the creation of the universe?" obviously, and the old "you just gotta have faith". Neither of those "points" are rational at all, with all due respect. I don't mean to be a a-hole, but I just don't see how you can think that way. I hope that you see this and respond, because I am quite interested.People who think they are superior are often very interesting to talk to, maybe because I am one myself.[/quote]Everybody who has an opinion believes that their opinion is correct. Whether theists, atheists, deists, dualists, pluralists, etc... are correct, all will believe they know more than the others (including those who believe there is no universal truth and whatever feels good is right. Note: they don't like people who believe there is absolute truth and whatever feels good is NOT necessarily right). The test is not how well they argue, how good they look, or how many people agree, the test is whether or not they are correct. And only people who really do KNOW the truth in their mind, body, and soul (to describe the deepest possible sense of confidence and peace) are correct. And it is impossible to know something that deeply that is not true. Only those who seek the truth unconditionally will find it, and those who think they already know everything will find out some time how foolish they are. I am a theist, and I am confident, but I don't want to be arrogant. I don't know everything about God. I welcome confidence in atheists, however, because they are not all stupid. Whatever you believe, you are only stupid if you believe it blindly. And I do believe that logic and reason fit very well into the Christian understanding of God. God does not fit into OUR logic and reason, but TRUE logic and reason fit into God.[quote name='ninjachef' date='Mar 22 2006, 09:52 AM' post='1170446'][quote]I'm an atheist, and I'd really like to know how fundementalist Christians, who believe every word in the bible, explain many of its internal inconsistencies. There's a great list of them here. If the bible is the word of God, then it should all match up, but if it was written by many different people, you would expect to see inconsistencies and contradictions, as there are.[/quote]Long since been beaten to death with a stick. You CAN'T take the bible litterally. Jesus spoke in parables; let he who hath ears listen. The book was written by men, therefore it is flawed.[/quote][quote name='Syphex' date='Mar 22 2006, 11:58 AM' post='1170715'][quote name='ninjachef' post='1170446' date='Mar 22 2006, 02:52 PM']Long since been beaten to death with a stick. You CAN'T take the bible litterally. Jesus spoke in parables; let he who hath ears listen. The book was written by men, therefore it is flawed.[/quote]Well, no, I don't think you CAN take it literally. I don't think it's true at all. But try telling that to some people I know, and millions of others around the world, who really do take it literally. Believe me, I wish they didn't.[/quote][quote name='ninjachef' date='Mar 22 2006, 09:38 PM' post='1172293'][quote]Well, no, I don't think you CAN take it literally. I don't think it's true at all. But try telling that to some people I know, and millions of others around the world, who really do take it literally. Believe me, I wish they didn't.[/quote]Taken literally, the earth, according to the bible, is about 6,000 years old. Not supposed to be a literal book. Tell your fundementalist friends.[/quote]There is literal truth is the Bible and there is metaphorical truth. The problem Jews and Christians, plus secular scholars (historians, etc...) have is interpretation. And good, accurate interpretation of a book revealed by the Holy Spirit of God can only come by the same Holy Spirit. If you study the Bible, a lot of it doesn't make sense, but if you want to understand it, God will assist you.Jesus did OFTEN speak in parables. He also spoke directly a lot of the time, too. That doesn't mean we understand EVERYTHING He or any of the prophets said, but it means that the Bible can be taken literally sometimes and figuratively sometimes.[quote name='danNAD444' date='Mar 24 2006, 09:32 PM' post='1178797']hmmmz im a free thinker who has been doing up some research of my own accord and free time.. ima into wicca,buddhism,taoism,islam,thai buddhism,pagan,christian and satanism.. anyone whos interested in mutiple religion data gathering pls pm me too?[/quote]Of course, if there is actually universal, absolute, solid truth about God and about what is right and what is wrong, randomly choosing the elements you like from a bunch of different religions won't help you eternally.I like (and respect) a whole bunch of religions, but ONLY Christianity says that man is imperfect, man cannot become perfect, and God has chosen according to His grace to MAKE us perfect by His Holy Spirit and the atonement of His Son Jesus Christ. EVERY other religion either says that we are already perfect and we just need to do whatever feels right or we can work hard enough to be acceptable to God. Both are completely incorrect. God has a standard of righteousness that we don't meet up to. He will only accept us if we focus our hearts and minds on Him and ask Him to forgive us. He will forgive us AND help us to improve.We are not God. We are His creation and can become His children if we are spiritually reborn. We do not have power without either God's help (His Holy Spirit and angels) or the devil's help (demonic forces). There is no GOOD magic, because magic in and of itself is not dependent on God. Magic does indeed exist and can do apparently positive things, but humans cannot perform miracles without some spiritual assistance, either good (through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit) or bad (through Satan). Every concept or created thing comes from God, but has either remained pure or been corrupted. Satan is not equal to God, but because of pride, He wanted and wants to be. So he cannot create anything by himself, but he corrupts godly things for his own purposes. Any religion other than admission of imperfection and dependence on God's grace and forgiveness through faith and repentance is a corruption.If you want to find yourself, find out who you are in relation to Almighty God. It's hard to realize our own humanity at first, but when we do and He makes us more than we could ever be ourselves, life is truly abundant.[quote name='gabunxex' date='Mar 25 2006, 11:13 AM' post='1180297']
Of course not. Religion is just another form of corruption.I could write a storybook now, and centuries later, it can become a religion...[/quote]That's true. You could do that. Many people have founded religions that way. But that doesn't mean that there is no truth. If just one part of the Bible is true, that God is perfect and has standards of right and wrong, then it wouldn't actually matter what you thought about the rest of it, historically, philosophically, etc... because if God is perfect and has standards of right and wrong, you aren't God, you aren't perfect, and you are in His hands.People can insult the Bible as much as they want to directly or indirectly, it doesn't change any of it. People insult what they don't like, and you don't like the Bible because it confronts you.[quote name='Eyefusion' date='Mar 25 2006, 06:08 PM' post='1181314']i dont really believe in god, ppl just want a reason for everything.[/quote]There is a reason for everything. Science alone does not provice a satisfactory reason for the existence of physical matter, intelligent thought, and personality/emotion. Only an eternal, spiritual realm, in which God (without beginning or end) decided to create a universe with physical matter, intelligent thought, and personality/emotion, makes sense and has no inconsistencies.You might not like the idea. You might think it's illogical, irrationable, unreasonable, fictional, blah blah blah. But whether or not you like it has nothing to do with the truth. I don't like the fact that I am not perfect. But not liking it doesn't make me perfect unless I ask God to work in me. So when the Bible, or any other book containing spiritual ideas, is criticized by people who don't believe there is a spiritual realm, it doesn't change anything. It doesn't make an atheist feel better or a theist feel worse. It just makes you feel temporarily like you got one over on somebody. But it doesn't explain to you why everything exists. There is no physical explanation for why everything exists, but science without God tries to find one and that is futile. Whether you believe in a Big Bang as the uncaused cause or just that the universe has always existed in a continuous cycle, there is no explanation for intelligent thought and personality/emotion UNLESS you accept that there is a supreme, spiritual, personal, intelligent designer.If you saw a house in a field, would you think somebody created it or that it evolved over billions of years? All theists do is accept the more obvious answer by faith instead of 'rationalizing' (another word for desperately trying to justify) the least likely explanation.[quote name='gabunxex' date='Mar 26 2006, 07:26 AM' post='1183142']What has your God done for you lately?

[/quote]Firstly, I am alive. I didn't create myself. So, lately, while I am still alive, God has maintained my life. Secondly, God has blessed my marriage because it is based on His perfect model for love. Thirdly, after moving from England to the US, God has seen to it that I get a ministry position and that my wife get's income to support us, putting food on the table, paying bills and fees for things that seem too expensive. Fourthly, God allows me to enjoy life, having chances at some point to do pretty much everything I can think of that I like to do... I'm not rich at all, but I enoy life. I didn't enjoy like before Jesus Christ and God's Holy Spirit transformed me by the renewing of my mind.Lately, God is drawing you to Himself by asking you questions in your soul (not audibly) about existence that make you respond by criticizing (with good intentions) and by asking questions (wanting the truth). God is always at work, we just don't like the fact that He doesn't do everything WE want when WE want Him to. He'll solve the world's problems eternally, in His PERFECT time instead of our IMPATIENT time.Lately, God loves you even though you (and I) are unlovable. He doesn't hold anything you do wrong against you if your heart wants His forgiveness.[quote name='twistedazn' date='Mar 26 2006, 05:25 PM' post='1184710']she means that science is proof of the things around you and religion is made up stuff[/quote][quote name='Da Boom' date='Mar 27 2006, 03:25 PM' post='1187047']I beleive there is science, i think God is for everyone who refuses to learn and its just an escape, or they have science but their science points to a god.[/quote]That probably is what she meant, but science means knowledge, and knowledge is not false until a 'scientist' decides that God is not a valid precondition. Secular scientists presuppose that God does not exist and that the Big Bang (or some other theory) is a better explanation. Everybody presupposes SOMETHING about God or existence, even if it is that He is not there, and they think they are correct. But unless they ARE correct, they are no smarter than somebody who presuppose that He IS there, because they might be correct instead (not as well). Some are right and some are wrong on this forum, but there is truth. Science does not hold the truth unless the foundation of science is that everything was designed by God. No matter how much the world tries to avoid it, intelligent design is necessary for us to even think. A Big Bang does NOT account for life, it can only partially account for matter existing in different forms, by coincidence. How living organisms think and work doesn't make sense until you introduce original intelligence. To not have faith in God is to have faith in the eternal existence in the universe. You can decide to believe whatever you want to, but there is faith involved. Why not err on the side of something being higher than 'Almighty' YOU?By the way, the fact that we are talking about God means that He exists. I've said before, the question is not whether or not He exists, but Who is He and What is He like.[quote name='crazy mike' date='Mar 27 2006, 02:36 PM' post='1186958']well heres one for all you "religous" people - if there is an all powerful god can he make a boulder so heavy that he himself cant lift it - and if he can that meens he is in fack not all powerful - just a hack in a costume

[/quote]I love that question. Actually yes, God could make a boulder so heavy that He Himself can't lift it. You don't believe He exists, but in theory, God can do anything, right? Ok. All He has to do is create a large boulder just as He created the universe itself, by speaking it into existence (while He is in Spirit form). Then, all He has to do is assume human form and limit Himself. He can do anything, so He can create a huge boulder. He can also lift the boulder, but He can also change form so that He cannot lift it. Just like when God was with us in the form of Jesus Christ, He can limit Himself and be omnipotent at the same time. Amazing riddle, I like it.[quote name='neontigerx' date='Mar 27 2006, 05:15 PM' post='1187415']Anyway let me cut this bible crap out. You wanna know the real truth about the bibile?The Bible was not handed to mankind by God, nor was it dictated to human stenographers by God. It has nothing to do with God. In actuality, the Bible was
VOTED to be the word of God by a group of men during the 4th century[/quote]The books of the Old Testament were 'canonized' (agree upon officially and compiled as true Scripture) in about the 2nd century A.D. The books of the New Testament were canonized in the 4th century A.D. But canonization has nothing to do with when the book were first accepted as divinely inspired.The Torah (Law), Nevim (Prophets), and the Ketuvim (Writings) of the Old Testament were being used as Scripture in separate scrolls by the Jews long before Christ. The Torah was used since Moses (and the Talmud, which is human interpretation of the law, was regarded as a separate compilation). The Prophets were known as prophets for whatever reason WHILE they were alive, so their writings were also accepted as Scirpture (even though a lot of the prophetic books are confrontational). The Wisdom Literature was also accepted from the Kings who wrote it quite early on. There were no Old Testament prophets after about 400 B.C. (the start of the Intertestamental Period), but the canon still hadn't been put together. They only had copied scrolls for the different pieces of Scripture, but people knew what was and wasn't inspired of God. Later, they decided to but it into codices (the kind of books we use today).A similar thing happened with the New Testament canon. The voted in the Councils of Trent, Nicaea, etc... were not to determine what was inspired Scripture and what was not. They voted on whether or not different Gospels and letters, etc... were ALREADY accepted by Christian congregations. If was more of a formality than anything else. Some argued certain doctrines, but they went with what Christians already believed were the true teachings of Jesus Christ and the apostles. Apostolicity was the requirement. New Testament books had to have been written either firsthand by Jesus' apostles or by their companions. The books of the New Testament (agreed by the majority of scholars, even non-Christians) were all written between about 48 A.D. (the earliest being Mark and Galatians) and 100 A.D. (the latest being the Book of Revelation by the apostle John). Other books were written later, by people who were not apostles, supposedly by apostles but in contradiction to earlier writings and Christ's accepted teachings. So all they did in the first century was compile accepted books and put certain doctrines in writing. It's not like any biblical books were written in the 4th century, because the church (as a whole, not just the people who met in the Councils) wouldn't have accepted 'new revelation' at that point.But it's good that you're thinking critically[quote name='Lokii13' date='Mar 27 2006, 06:12 PM' post='1187579']just like to say god gave a group of high class male land owners a list of 10 things he didnt want you to do up on a hill when no one was around(wink) sound to me like it was a marketing distiondon't ya think? ^^Help keep people in line[/quote]Because God knows everything and we don't, I'm glad He has rights and wrongs for our own protection. He often protects us from harm we will cause ourselves if we act foolishly. I don't have a problem submitting to somebody higher than me in every aspect if existence. I have a problem not being kept in line and being allowed to wander aimlessly through life giving in to whatever my flesh desires instead of what is most constructive. Without the Holy Spirit of God, it is IMPOSSIBLE not to sin. That's not God being mean, it's us being imperfect. It isn't God's fault that some things are better for us than others, and it's not wrong for Him to guide us. He doesn't take away our free will, He gives us a freer will to do right instead of being a slave to this temporary, physical life.[quote name='neontigerx' date='Mar 27 2006, 06:12 PM' post='1187580']Another thing, this is a real kicker: When the Bible was written, they forgot one big detail. The Americas. The bible never ONCE even mentioned land to the west of Europe in any great prophecy, only 'prophecy' of the world they lived in, Rome and Asia. Hinting at all towards god being questionable? But that is besides the point. In the Americas, there are people known as NATIVE AMERICANS. Now, they NEVER recieved any ten commandments, NEVER knew about Jesus Christ, and NEVER questioned what it was they knew about their beings of power, such as Coyotes, Foxes, Whales, Earth Starter, The Old Man, The Woman who fell from the sky, the World on the Turtles back, or the Right and Left handed twin brother creators. Never did I ever hear of them recieving any type of Godly influence to write their own book, too. Had such a thing happened, we could be certain that the Christian god was the correct god. But they never had even pondered on that godview. So, how does the Bible account for these people? It was never Prophesized that a great giant continent had existed just to the west of Africa and Europe or the East of Asia! Why do you think that god left out this EXTREME detail?[/quote]The Bible didn't mention England either, or Germany, or France. The Bible didn't mention you by name either. Your history books in school don't mention your school, so either your school doesn't really exist or the history books are wrong...How about the Bible doesn't mention the Americas because they aren't relevant to the message of the Bible. The message of good news for an imperfect world APPLIES to everybody around the world, and everybody who would accept it will have an opportunity according to God's grace, but God doesn't have to talk about all the countries in the world just to make His prophecies true for me or you, neontigerx, or for anybody else. God doesn't need YOUR logic and reason to make Him feel good. As for native Americans and other unreached people groups, they had and have the same opportunity to seek God by faith as anybody else who doesn't hear the message of Jesus Christ before they die, but has seen God evident in His creation and wonders who we are, where we come from, how we know anything, why it is so. People who seek God without God revealing Himself to them will still be recognized by God, like Job, the first writer of the Old Testament, who was not a Jew. Some are saved by believing that God is real and must be holy and that He must me merciful because we exist. But if you want to believe that it is ridiculous and impossible for God to exist, it doesn't matter is there IS a reason for something not being how you want it. You've already said in your heart that there is no God. It's up to you, not me or God or anybody else, to continue seeking the truth until you find it.[quote name='Gundamds' date='Mar 27 2006, 06:27 PM' post='1187612']@neo tiger X earlier post Not the one above here but the one on the last page : Not to sound like I don't care or see your point of view, but do take in consideration that if God did tell them that America exist what point will it serve, I mean their were no way for people to cross that body of ocean at the time so telling them that a land exist if they themselves will never have any contact with in the near future. Plus many scientist believe that most (or all) of the native american came across the great Ice brigde that once connected North american land mass with parts of northern asia (This true but add research need to be applied) and also take in to account in to Matt 24:14 when it says [quote]14 And this good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will come. [/quote] According to this scripture the good news was suppose to be preach to all the inhabited earth so That would include Native amercian once they get in contact with the god word the bible (but we all know that never really happen now don't we)Plus in my belief anyone who never had a chance to learn about god will be resureacted to a pardise earth(after armagedon) to learn about god without any outside influence (satan the devil). As for other christain views well they 'll need to expalin themselves because that always brother me about christaindom... some very strong contridiction( or example - you believe in god you go to heaven don't burn in hell. Now if I were to destroy every one in the world that would only leave only one billion people to go to heave while the rest burn in hell, I kinda find that wrong on so many levels) Well that me...[/quote]I used to be a Jehovah's Witness like you. I admire your arguments and your faith and your willingness to think freely and discuss. I know a lot of Jehovah's Witnesses feel like they shouldn't think too much, because the organization tells you how to understand the Bible in Watchtowers and other publications, but continue to seek a deeper relationship with Jehovah God through Jesus Christ by the power of His Holy Spirit. I encourage you to keep on reading the Bible, preferrably the King James Version, New KJV, or New American Standard (best literal translation based on most recent understand of the original Hebrew and Greek). God will lead to closer to Him. Just one long question, do you believe that: all humans are imperfect, that we cannot become righteous other than through repentance and belief in the atonement of Jesus Christ, that the Holy Spirit of God comes to reside with us and help us live according to God's grace, and that improvement in our good works is always the RESULT of true faith? If you believe we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ (Romans 10:9, confess with your mouth and believe in your heart that Jesus Christ is Lord and that God raised Him from the dead), you will be saved and you are my brother (or sister) in Christ.[quote name='Michael Wilson' date='Mar 27 2006, 07:54 PM' post='1187892']i'm wiccan i beleive in the Three Fold Goddess[/quote]Historically, when was Wicca founded? This isn't a criticism, I am just wondering... And please don't say it's always existed, or it was founded by Queen HSOIHDHDLKS 20,000 years ago. I mean historically.Sorry this post was so long, but there were so many things I wanted to respond to. It's still getting longer as I type. Sorry. Sorry... whoops, I did it again. Sorry... D'OH!I don't know why my quotes' HTML hasn't worked...
Edited by dadroz, 28 March 2006 - 07:19 PM.