God real or not?
#5426
Guest_AMHV
Posted 06 March 2008 - 07:35 AM
#5427
Guest_inDe_eD
Posted 06 March 2008 - 07:43 AM
#5428
Guest_AMHV
Posted 06 March 2008 - 04:23 PM
#5429
Guest_Civie
Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:21 PM
#5430
Guest_Roler
Posted 11 March 2008 - 01:18 AM
#5431
Guest_AMHV
Posted 11 March 2008 - 05:17 AM
Edited by AMHV, 11 March 2008 - 05:27 AM.
#5432
Guest_lordsuzaku
Posted 11 March 2008 - 12:09 PM
#5433
Guest_AMHV
Posted 11 March 2008 - 03:13 PM
#5434
Guest_kamatayan
Posted 11 March 2008 - 03:37 PM
#5435
Guest_Balore
Posted 11 March 2008 - 11:27 PM
#5436
Guest_AMHV
Posted 12 March 2008 - 12:08 AM
#5437
Guest_sheep13
Posted 12 March 2008 - 04:09 AM
#5438
Guest_AMHV
Posted 12 March 2008 - 04:34 AM
It escapes me how some people write nonsense sentences without even reading posts before this.I belive I have given my proof in above posts.It escapes me how some people can believe wholeheartedly in this great being that watches over all of us, and is supposed to love each of us, when there is no proof.
#5439
Guest_Balore
Posted 12 March 2008 - 08:05 AM
Psalm 135:7 (King James Version)"He causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings for the rain; he bringeth the wind out of his treasuries."Jeremiah 10:13 (King James Version)"When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures."Alright. I just did. I don't see one thing that points to the Earth being circular. Not one..Psalms 135:7; Jeremiah 10:13This does talk about the circularity of earth. Actually read the verse.
No, it doesn't. It doesn't at all. It's so vague that you could come up with anything for it. When I read it, I assumed it meant that everyone would see the bodies and whatnot through the divine power of God. There's no reason to believe it's a reference to television. Don't you think that such an important book would be a little more clearer? This is supposed to be important stuff here. There shouldn't even have to be a single interpretation.I'll admit, all of them may not be perfect but the television one works.
Those people aren't any more convincing either. You can always find someone that's willing to believe something, no matter what it is, and they'll definitely claim to understand it.Yet the people that have context and know about the bible get this.....
#5440
Guest_AMHV
Posted 12 March 2008 - 03:18 PM
all of them may not be perfect but the television one works. You know why? (If you know what the verse is atlking about, it makes sense) It talks about the two prophets who coem down from heaven and later die. And the ENTIRE WORLD, EVERY TRIBE AND NATION, AND PEOPLE WILL SE THEIR BODIES. First of all, How is anyone going see their bodies if it is so far away in Israel without T.V? And second, if the T.V doesnt exist, How are people going to get there in 3 and a half days without cars, aiplanes?
No need to say more. there are other more dependable versions older than this.(King James Version)
#5441
Guest_Balore
Posted 12 March 2008 - 08:51 PM
#5442
Guest_AMHV
Posted 13 March 2008 - 12:11 AM
Assume= Ass U Me.Through what kidn of power of God. People think religion is just Asking for a dollar and getting it. It is asking God for it but you ahev to give EFFORT.It applies to this revelation verse as well.No, it doesn't. It doesn't at all. It's so vague that you could come up with anything for it. When I read it, I assumed it meant that everyone would see the bodies and whatnot through the divine power of God. There's no reason to believe it's a reference to television. Don't you think that such an important book would be a little more clearer? This is supposed to be important stuff here. There shouldn't even have to be a single interpretation.
#5443
Guest_Balore
Posted 13 March 2008 - 12:20 AM
I can't see the original being DRASTICALLY different from the newer versions. I'll do my best to quote the original next time, though.Obviously the original hebrew or aramaic or greek.
I've already told you. It could just as easily mean a flat Earth, just in the shape of a circle. Think pizza. It doesn't mention anything about Earth being spherical.And yes the circle of the earth. What else could it be?
What about it? I see nothing pointing to a circular Earth in that verse.What about the other verse? As far as from the east to the west?
Kay.Assume= Ass U Me.
What kind of power? This is God we're talking about, here. He can make anything happen, so I think it's safe to assume he can make everyone see the bodies if he wanted to.Through what kidn of power of God. People think religion is just Asking for a dollar and getting it. It is asking God for it but you ahev to give EFFORT.It applies to this revelation verse as well.
#5444
Guest_AMHV
Posted 13 March 2008 - 12:30 AM
It is different but the intention is the sameI can't see the original being DRASTICALLY different from the newer versions. I'll do my best to quote the original next time, though.
As far as east to the west. That means that the east of the world meets the west side.. in other words, a sphere.What about it? I see nothing pointing to a circular Earth in that verse.
I mean power as in he gave us the human brain to think. And through God creating the human brain, we created a T.V. so that the bodies can be seen. So through HIS power, we created a T.V. and again, Assume= Ass U Me.Do you believe that God exists?(this is relevant)What kind of power? This is God we're talking about, here. He can make anything happen, so I think it's safe to assume he can make everyone see the bodies if he wanted to.
#5445
Guest_Balore
Posted 13 March 2008 - 02:23 AM
I don't think it would be different enough to have any new meaning.It is different but the intention is the same.
What? It means as far as the east to the west; nothing more. It's merely saying that he sees all. There's no reason to Ass U Me that the two points meet.As far as east to the west. That means that the east of the world meets the west side.. in other words, a sphere.
If you could explain to me why you keep looking down upon assumptions, that'd be great, because you're not making any sense to me on that subject. That's an interesting interpretation, but it doesn't make it right. It doesn't make mine right either, but that's my point; you can think up dozens of possibilities, not just your T.V. one.I mean power as in he gave us the human brain to think. And through God creating the human brain, we created a T.V. so that the bodies can be seen. So through HIS power, we created a T.V. and again, Assume= Ass U Me.
I don't believe any gods exist. I suppose now you'll spout off garbage on how I just can't understand how the faithful see things more clearly or something. Oh, joy.And by the way, it's completely irrelevant. This is all interpretation.Do you believe that God exists?(this is relevant)
#5446
Guest_Twisterspi
Posted 13 March 2008 - 02:44 AM
#5447
Guest_AMHV
Posted 13 March 2008 - 03:40 AM
We do have the choice to either believe him or not. As simple as that.How many people wrote the bible? There are 40 authors of the books of the Bible. we know the names of most of them but there are anonymous writers too. Some of the authors wrote one book, some wrote several. We are not "scared" to do anything. It is our choices. Choices are what make us, what makes people different(not physically.) We know just about how the bible came to be. it was written by God through the peopel he chose to use.This has nothing to do with what we WANT to believe (although many ignorant people think that we need the choice of beleving(sp?) in a book that we dont know exactly know how came to be.) but how we should believe. you have the choice to believe in this "god" figure that created everything and will take you to an eternal happiness after death with no actual proof of his existance. If anyone can PROVE there is a god, please do. and the bible isint a form a proof, it's a book made by someone, Noone really knows who because it wasn't documented by an actual person that we could have known of. without hell there cant be a heaven such as without evil there cant be good. hell is no doubt a way to scare people into thinking that they always have to do the right things in life. Untill the day comes there's proof of god then i'm staying an athiest.
#5448
Guest_vbaboy5
Posted 17 March 2008 - 11:59 PM
#5449
Guest_FlyingKnights
Posted 18 March 2008 - 10:25 PM
#5450
Guest_kiras sekai
Posted 27 March 2008 - 12:02 AM
no, religion was created by men, Jesus didnt came to the world to fund a new religion but to show us a way of life, the way to salvation not by man hands but by a loving God who gave us all even though we are not willing to give anything, and he gave us all even though we didnt deserve it... now u just have to accept it, after all God is a person witch is offering friendship to all of those willing to listenWell if God exists then Religion has to exist.Both are inextricably intertwined.& Christianity isnt a conspiricy.. loland those who believe in the big bang theory, why would you want to believe in that in the first place? you like the fact that you were spec's that evolved into bigger specs and after soo long became a human? even if God Doesnt exist (which he does), why wouldnt you want to believe that you were created by God? that you didnt just evolve from some crap floating around in space that evovled.. and the fact that it cant be duplicated again? isnt that a clue? that u arent an evolved species? anyways, thats enough for todays lesson, feel free to reply to this, and No Flamming.








