Jump to content


wat looks better


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_lKaYoSl

Guest_lKaYoSl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2005 - 08:49 PM

http://img209.exs.cx...oredcopy4tp.giforhttp://img194.exs.cx...ed12copy6hi.gif.. need opinoins
  • 0

#2 Opulent Maelstrom

Opulent Maelstrom

    Sloth

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:17 PM

What are we supposed to give "opinoins" about? The image? The coloring? The rendering?
  • 0

Posted Image


#3 Guest_Funsize

Guest_Funsize
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:18 PM

First one, detail is much nicer, second the shading is a little overdone. Although you wouldnt be able to tell the difference if you weren't looking at them side by side. I say the first one is better.
  • 0

#4 Guest_lKaYoSl

Guest_lKaYoSl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:27 PM

which one looks better
  • 0

#5 Guest_Keiosu

Guest_Keiosu
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:28 PM

I think the second one is better.
  • 0

#6 Guest_Fallen Angel

Guest_Fallen Angel
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:39 PM

Second definetly the shading is much better, in the first one his skin looks sort ofn grayish...
  • 0

#7 Opulent Maelstrom

Opulent Maelstrom

    Sloth

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:45 PM

which one looks better

Tough call then. The first one is more realistic whereas the second looks like a painting.
  • 0

Posted Image


#8 MetaCal

MetaCal

    Walkin' the Dog

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 724 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2005 - 10:24 PM

both are crap.
  • 0
Posted Image

#9 Guest_lKaYoSl

Guest_lKaYoSl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2005 - 10:26 PM

"hater" lolcome one need more feedback
  • 0