Jump to content


War against terror


  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_ali 549

Guest_ali 549
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2008 - 12:57 PM

Is there any thing such as war against terror or is it one of president Bush trick to get all of the oil rich countries and why should people involve in other people's religion .. How can Some one teach about guns in a religious place.Isn't it just a plan dont u agree,
  • 0

#2 Guest_electrosmurf

Guest_electrosmurf
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 February 2008 - 10:02 PM

  • Is there any thing such as war against terror or is it one of president Bush trick to get all of the oil rich countries
  • why should people involve in other people's religion ..
  • How can Some one teach about guns in a religious place.
  • Isn't it just a plan dont u agree,

  • Yes, maybe, but they are things who say it's just a revenge action with economic influences
  • Because some religions doesn't respect other people's right's. Let me refrase that, some people think that their religion let them do such things.
  • Easy, grab a teacher, put him in a religious place, a decent cover.
  • Nope, i don't

  • 0

#3 Guest_TheBleedingOnion

Guest_TheBleedingOnion
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 February 2008 - 06:57 AM

of corse there is a war on terror, you dont hear about it as much anymore but why else do you think we are still in afghanistan? osama = a terrorist who attacked the US. so seeing as osama does not own a country, we couldnt declare war on a nation, we declaired it on terror in general. now this allowed us to go after osama, but it also allowed a gate into other middle eastern nations in the name of "fighting terror". the original reason we entered this war was good, however with bush in office i feel he may try to use the fact that there are terrorists in iran to try to invade or something. Fortunately, his term in office is almost over, so i dont have to worry about that so much. dont get me wrong though, as far as afghanistan and iraq are concerned, i feel we are doing the right thing by being there... i just dont know how hard we are actualy looking for osama. i mean, we either arnt looking very hard, or that guy is the king of hide and go seek.
  • 0

#4 Guest_Tsushima

Guest_Tsushima
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 February 2008 - 07:00 AM

there is a war on terror but the way bush is doing it is just idiotic
  • 0

#5 Guest_ali 549

Guest_ali 549
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 February 2008 - 12:37 PM

Hear this and hear this straight that there is no such thing as Osama bcause its just one big fraud if there was an Osama then one day he would b gone and there would b no reason to fight.............www.dbzgtlegacy.com/showpic.shtml?http://www.dbzgtlegacy.com/pictures/8.jpg

Edited by ali 549, 27 February 2008 - 12:39 PM.

  • 0

#6 Guest_Omega Chill

Guest_Omega Chill
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 February 2008 - 07:12 PM

Oh right there is no osama guess the army can stop looking now dumbass there were terrorist before him and there will be terrorist after him and just because everything eventually dies doesn't mean that they can't cause massive damage and deaths while they're still living. Actually given the amount of time its been he's either dead in a cave somewhere or in a different country completelyThe "war on terror" will never end due to the fact that terror will always exist due to the fact that terror is part of human natureAnd the current war on terror won't end using the methods we're using now
  • 0

#7 Guest_b89

Guest_b89
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 March 2008 - 04:12 AM

Oh right there is no osama guess the army can stop looking now dumbass there were terrorist before him and there will be terrorist after him and just because everything eventually dies doesn't mean that they can't cause massive damage and deaths while they're still living. Actually given the amount of time its been he's either dead in a cave somewhere or in a different country completelyThe "war on terror" will never end due to the fact that terror will always exist due to the fact that terror is part of human natureAnd the current war on terror won't end using the methods we're using now

Good post...You guys can all blame this on the drunkard british ppl who drew up the arbitrary lines that make up Jordan, Iraq, Syria and all the rest in the arabian part of the world. Remember , there never was such a thing as Iraq before WWII
  • 0

#8 Guest_الِش

Guest_الِش
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 March 2008 - 11:05 PM

The "war on terror" will never end due to the fact that terror will always exist due to the fact that terror is part of human natureThe war on 'terrorists we don't like' generally does, though.And the current war on terror won't end using the methods we're using nowCan I ask you a question?During the mid-80's in Beirut, it was a bad time to be a Western diplomat. But the East was not immune to the "Islamic Jihad" as well.In 1984, on September 1st, three Soviet diplomats were kidnapped from their embassy car. One of them was shot the next day and dumped on in a junkyard.Now, imagine you are in charge of rescuing your diplomats. Since, sometime in late September, the Soviet Union sent a KGB squad to its embassy to try and free it's diplomats. In addition, you also have the help of a local Druze militia, who have discovered rumors of the location of a close relative of the lead kidnapper. You have little information aside from this.So, assuming you have the full power a mid-ranking KGB operative(so no nukes. Also, the Israelis might view any Soviet flights from nearby friendly Syria as threats), what do you do?Good post...You guys can all blame this on the drunkard british ppl who drew up the arbitrary lines that make up Jordan, Iraq, Syria and all the rest in the arabian part of the world. Remember , there never was such a thing as Iraq before WWIIFirst of all, thank you for raping history. The correct wording is 'before the collapse of the Ottoman Empire'.Second of all, I find it highly ironic that the British are to blame, judging by how the majority of their colonies turned out alright (Jordan, Iraq). Actually, Iraq is roughly geographical to the southeast (Shat-al Arab).Third of rule, to ignore seventy years of Arab independent rule is idiotic at best.

Edited by الِش, 01 March 2008 - 11:05 PM.

  • 0

#9 Guest_lordoftheflies

Guest_lordoftheflies
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 March 2008 - 11:08 PM

i can't help but believe that it is basically just one big stinking pile from washington. you know what they say about power, power corrupts. =P
  • 1

#10 Guest_الِش

Guest_الِش
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 March 2008 - 11:32 PM

^You know what they say about idiots; they don't die.
  • -1

#11 Guest_Omega Chill

Guest_Omega Chill
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 March 2008 - 02:08 AM

whoever said idiots don't die is an idiot cause idiots die idotic ideas however don't there's a difference
  • 0

#12 Guest_electrosmurf

Guest_electrosmurf
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:38 PM

i can't help but believe that it is basically just one big stinking pile from washington. you know what they say about power, power corrupts. =P

And absolute powers corrupts absolutely.
  • 1

#13 Guest_alfons88

Guest_alfons88
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 March 2008 - 06:57 PM

I think the world should oraganize against the us and a..
  • 0

#14 Guest_الِش

Guest_الِش
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 March 2008 - 07:49 PM

whoever said idiots don't die is an idiot cause idiots dieDue to population rates, idiots never really die, actually.I think the world should oraganize against the us and a..Good luck. This is the planet earth, where people hate their neighbors at least as much as foreign powers.
  • 0

#15 Guest_Omega Chill

Guest_Omega Chill
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 March 2008 - 08:10 PM

ok idiots as a whole don't die but individual idiots do die
  • 0

#16 Guest_iNouda

Guest_iNouda
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 March 2008 - 08:22 PM

I think the world should oraganize against the us and a..

The US would have no qualms about nuking the rest of the world into submission if that were to happen. AFter all, what stopped them from atomizing Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
  • 0

#17 Guest_AMHV

Guest_AMHV
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 March 2008 - 06:47 AM

This war is absolutely pointless. it is for OIL people. America is addicted to oil.You are right. Power is destroyed but absoulute power is absolutely destroyed.
  • 0

#18 Guest_Skysplitter

Guest_Skysplitter
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 March 2008 - 07:07 PM

This war is absolutely pointless. it is for OIL people. America is addicted to oil.You are right. Power is destroyed but absoulute power is absolutely destroyed.

You are too right in the fact that the U.S. is addicted to OIL. Our government make over one and a half dollars in taxes on Every single gallon of gasoline sold in the us so as long as our govt wants money we will want oilfar as the war goes it is also about rebuilding what the former opressive govt had destroyed. you cant say that its not because i have pics to prove what a majority of our rines in iraq are doing, Rebuilding, cleaning, and advancing technologies.
  • 0

#19 Guest_الِش

Guest_الِش
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 March 2008 - 01:49 AM

AFter all, what stopped them from atomizing Hiroshima and Nagasaki?A desire to lose hundreds of thousands of American soldiers and kill millions more Japanese civilians than was needed to end that war?far as the war goes it is also about rebuilding what the former opressive govt had destroyed. you cant say that its not because i have pics to prove what a majority of our rines in iraq are doing, Rebuilding, cleaning, and advancing technologies.Good. Show me the pics of what our 'rines' are doing, then, so I can show you the statistics that prove you wrong.You are right. Power is destroyed but absoulute power is absolutely destroyed.Thanks for raping one more quote.You are too right in the fact that the U.S. is addicted to OIL. Our government make over one and a half dollars in taxes on Every single gallon of gasoline sold in the us so as long as our govt wants money we will want oilI'd like to think that after advancement in ethanol, solar, and hydro-electric technology, in addition to more fuel-efficient cars, that we've come a long way since 1973.
  • 0

#20 Guest_BillDoor

Guest_BillDoor
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 March 2008 - 04:30 AM

The War on Terror is neither a war nor directed against terror. The struggle to stop people from killing us, on the other hand, is not an illusion; it's just that recent alarmism has turned it into a cause for panic and hooked some nice catchphrases on it. Basically, the War on Terror is a terrorist's dream: instead of being 'isolated incidents,' terrorist attacks suddenly become crushing blows against democracy and battle victories for the shadowy league of terrorists that wants to DESTROY US ALL.When, in practice, what we've got are a bunch of opportunistic, angry people who sometimes manage to pull off complicated plots, and just as often manage to bungle them horribly.
  • 0

#21 Guest_heavens_light

Guest_heavens_light
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 March 2008 - 07:38 AM

I think it's quite hypocritical to declare a war on terror but completely ignore other areas of the world apart from the middle east. Terror exists everywhere; the War on Terror is just a catchphrase to rally the people towards Bush's interests.
  • 0

#22 Guest_الِش

Guest_الِش
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 March 2008 - 07:56 AM

Terror exists everywhere; the War on Terror is just a catchphrase to rally the people towards Bush's interests.Because people have never used catchphrases to rally people to their cause.
  • 0

#23 Guest_kamatayan

Guest_kamatayan
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 March 2008 - 11:42 AM

there is no war against terror.. war is terror, so it should be against itself, so the war shouldn't exist in the first place if it is against terror..
  • 0

#24 Guest_الِش

Guest_الِش
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 07 March 2008 - 12:41 AM

^Again, Because people have never used catchphrases to rally people to their cause.

Edited by الِش, 07 March 2008 - 12:43 AM.

  • 0

#25 Guest_tr888

Guest_tr888
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 07 March 2008 - 05:06 AM

In my country, we also have terrorist. They have killed a number of innocent lives and have even impaired some people who are the sole provider for thier family. Is war against terror right? Of course it does! We cannot solve the problem of terrorism unless we "kill" the people behind terrorism. People on these organizations like Al Quida, Jamaa, etc. have no heart and thier minds is set on killing people and making money. They cannot be tamed by any means (except the Word of God of course which change lives). However, these people refuses to listen to the Word of God. Some of them even claimed to be believers of God but they dont follow the teachings of thier religion (Islam) and they dont listen to thier religious leaders. These people lack moral. Killing is a mortal sin. Anybody who kills deserve the same punishment. If we dont wage war against terrorism we condemn our lives and the future of our children. We can only have peace if terrorism will end
  • 0