Jump to content


should xbox live be free


  • Please log in to reply
170 replies to this topic

#126 ovesh

ovesh

    Winged Serpent

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 306 posts
Offline
Current mood: Happy
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 27 March 2009 - 12:19 AM

I think they are making nice money with it as it is, so no reason to give it away free. Even if it gains them more people they will still make more money by having people pay for it. It is the best that is the only reason they can make you pay for it. The day sony make a great online experience live will be free.
  • 0
not here

Posted Image

#127 Guest_nitsugahawk

Guest_nitsugahawk
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 27 March 2009 - 02:14 AM

HiNo I don't think Xbox Live should be free, if you see how many people use their 3 free accounts? nearly everybody... and with those 3 accounts they make 3 new gamertags... by imagine every person that has an xbox being able to make 3 gamertags for free... then imagine each person trying to play with their gamer tags and new people trying to make their gamer tags!! there would be no gamertags available for anyone... people just start new sessions just because they get bored of their games and therefore start new ones to replay all their games and get their achievements again and again... Therefore I conclude that XBox Live shouldn't be free... Cheers
  • 0

#128 Guest_Chii_nyuu

Guest_Chii_nyuu
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 March 2009 - 12:01 AM

I know if it was free my 360 would have live :^*POINTS were deducted for this post by Dannyslr81Please refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#129 Guest_chicojt

Guest_chicojt
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 March 2009 - 12:12 AM

xbox live should definately be freePOINTS were deducted for this post by Dannyslr81Please refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
  • 0

#130 Guest_Rastis

Guest_Rastis
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 March 2009 - 11:00 PM

Ya Sony definitely has the edge on online. FREE! come on the Live isn't all that interactive and lets face it some of us don't go on every day. Its not to sensible to pay even for a month when your only 'on' on weekends. I only manage it once or twice a month myself. And I had to plan for that so that I could participate in a Soul Calibur tournament.
  • 0

#131 Kiba

Kiba

    I make it hurt in the good way.

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 2,032 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 2
Neutral

Posted 29 March 2009 - 11:09 PM

Ya Sony definitely has the edge on online. FREE! come on the Live isn't all that interactive and lets face it some of us don't go on every day. Its not to sensible to pay even for a month when your only 'on' on weekends. I only manage it once or twice a month myself. And I had to plan for that so that I could participate in a Soul Calibur tournament.

Videogame hosting done on Xboxlive is a lot more reliable then PSN. That combined with the other features that are present justifies the cost. While SC can be laggy on Xboxlive it would be a lot worse on the PSN.
  • 0
Kiba=Fang

No more requests for questions?

"I would hate to wander upon a winking corpse"~ Battle Royale

@Kiza: From now on your name is maso.


#132 Guest_Rastis

Guest_Rastis
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 March 2009 - 02:17 AM

Videogame hosting done on Xboxlive is a lot more reliable then PSN. That combined with the other features that are present justifies the cost. While SC can be laggy on Xboxlive it would be a lot worse on the PSN.

WHat other features? All I get out of it is Netflix and demos.
  • 0

#133 Guest_Phenomenonsense

Guest_Phenomenonsense
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 March 2009 - 03:07 AM

Having to pay less than 5 dollars a month, if you buy it in bulk (i.e. a years worth), is nothing. And the online gameplay is MARVELOUS. I'd hate to have the PSN.
  • 0

#134 Guest_ochocinco

Guest_ochocinco
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 March 2009 - 03:52 AM

it should be free because you already pay for internetbut of course companies want money in their own pockets
  • 0

#135 Guest_Eldan12

Guest_Eldan12
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 March 2009 - 05:23 AM

it should def. be free. We paid so much money for the console and they want us to pay to play online too.... sony def. has the upper hand on online play
  • 0

#136 Guest_kcaopn

Guest_kcaopn
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 March 2009 - 05:50 AM

PS3 online is crappy compared to XBX live there is a lot more content for xbox live on the marketplace. Plus xbox live is free to agree- silver membership is pretty much live without multiplayer but it still gives you a functioning xbox with updates and a marketplace. Unfortunately no netflix on demand for silver members.
  • 0

#137 Guest_butsizzle

Guest_butsizzle
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 March 2009 - 11:34 PM

It wouldn't run as well if everything we're free like the PSN.Part of why XboxLIVE works so well is because it has money to maintain a working status and fix problems at the same time. Money talks my friends.
  • 0

#138 Guest_DevilsSin666X

Guest_DevilsSin666X
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 March 2009 - 04:47 AM

If it would be between XBL how it is now, or something like PSN/WFC, I'd gladly pad $50 a year. That's damn cheap for what you're getting. WoW is like, $15 a month for one game and no one complains...
  • 0

#139 Guest_Phillonius

Guest_Phillonius
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 March 2009 - 06:40 AM

As someone with both consoles, I often borrow friend's games to get achievements/trophies on both systems (I'll buy one but I'm not buying the same game twice). Anyways, so in general I've experienced more lag issues on the PS3 versions of games than on xbox versions. This is most likely because Sony does not have as good of a server system as Microsoft. So, I'm perfectly willing to pay $60 a year to have better quality online service (though a price drop would be nice).
  • 0

#140 Guest_SkyKingEX

Guest_SkyKingEX
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 March 2009 - 02:10 PM

i agree that it should be free or at least cheaper... there's the xbox marketplace to make up for its freeness:)
  • 0

#141 Guest_biggysorox

Guest_biggysorox
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 April 2009 - 05:07 AM

No, because it would be more like PS3's online, less services and less work on it. Basically online would suck if it was free.
  • 0

#142 Guest_pinky_popo

Guest_pinky_popo
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:07 AM

Y'know, I really think the price is the biggest problem with Xbox live. They're already charging us for downloadable games and content, even demos! My subscription has almost run out, and I don't feel like I've really used it to the extent of what they're charging. It's not like it's necessarily THAT expensive, but we should be getting more stuff free for what we're paying.
  • 0

#143 Guest_Epic Cheese

Guest_Epic Cheese
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 April 2009 - 02:38 AM

It will never happen, but it would be nice if the X-Box Live was free. X-Box Live has amazing features, and it rarely lags in multiplayer games, so it's worth however much it costs right now.
  • 0

#144 Guest_bigbear2321

Guest_bigbear2321
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 12 April 2009 - 05:35 PM

What about the server charges? 5 bucks a month and you keep your virginity sunds like a deal lol
  • 0

#145 Guest_jerzy1

Guest_jerzy1
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 13 April 2009 - 01:53 AM

If it was free, even more people would get on, instead of just hardcore gamers. If there was a way to make a profit off of it without having to maje people pay then that would be awesome.
  • 0

#146 Guest_amoliski

Guest_amoliski
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 13 April 2009 - 03:48 AM

Xbox charges so it can offer better quality services, and live has its own servers. PS3 makes the developers host the servers I think.
  • 0

#147 Guest_smeagoloz

Guest_smeagoloz
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 13 April 2009 - 09:31 AM

there's no reason it should be free if you can afford an xbox then you should be able to afford live most kids get 3 times the amount it cost in spending money lol
  • 0

#148 Guest_Fez11

Guest_Fez11
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 13 April 2009 - 09:51 AM

I think it should stay the way it is, you pay for it. Look at Playstation, their crappy service is free and you get what u pay for. Their online service doesnt even compare to Xbox Live.
  • 0

#149 Guest_nzder2007

Guest_nzder2007
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 14 April 2009 - 10:51 AM

it is very hard to make xbox live free... it is run by a company that wants to make a profit... and it costs to run a server that large... so unless they pack it with adds it cant be free.
  • 0

#150 Guest_fogfactor

Guest_fogfactor
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 15 April 2009 - 11:14 PM

I think xbox live should be free, if you paid for the internet, and the xbox and a game that goes online, then yes it should be free
  • 0