Mortal Kombat VS DC Comics?!?!?!?
#26
Guest_dnieuwsy
Posted 09 May 2008 - 09:51 PM
#27
Posted 10 May 2008 - 12:45 PM
Ok yeah, Ed Boon is truly an idiot. A lot of what he says is so contradictory with his own statements.I BRING EVIDENCE: http://www.maxconsol...ws&newsid=27534well, still the main source is from gametap.
The only thing that gets is a semi big:=\So he plans on modifying fatalities to be less violent and less "outrageous" but still "outrageous." Uhhh ok then!!!! While we're at it, let's go vegetarian and eat bacon!!!You know what I just realized while typing this is; it doesn't matter what type of finishers are going to be in the game, 3D Mortal Kombat games have always been completely subpar fighters anyways, he's going to have to pull a rabbit out of his ass to even THINK that this is going to be a good game in terms of gameplay. You can't win with fanservice alone.We did acknowledge that we won’t be able to do the same kinds of outrageous moves, like tearing someone's head off and the spine being attached to it. But there are a lot of assumptions that there will be no blood in the game, that there are no fatalities in the game. It's an assumption that, because the DC characters will be in there, those features will have to be dropped. My response is that, no, we're modifying fatalities. But I have every intention to keep finishers. You know, to let gamers do a really cool secret button combination and follow with a really outrageous finishing move to end the match.
#28
Posted 10 May 2008 - 02:40 PM
I don't have any underage porn or hentai on my profile.
#29
Guest_goreforcex
Posted 10 May 2008 - 04:42 PM
#30
Guest_zingorguitar
Posted 10 May 2008 - 04:46 PM
#31
Guest_bigcorean
Posted 12 May 2008 - 05:26 AM
#32
Guest_Lioncock
Posted 13 May 2008 - 12:21 AM
#33
Posted 13 May 2008 - 12:24 AM
Ehhh... dunno if that's a valid reason to have MK:Trilogy as the best one, if you're going by the amount of characters in the game, why not say Armageddon is the best one D: Plus, the mixture of characters was a lot better in UMK3, and having some missing ninjas in there didn't hurt the game, I also felt it was the most balanced of the series (Guh @ Human Smoke, though)To downshift, I think it's the mortal kombat trilogy which is the best mortal kombat game (Since it has a complete cast of characters than ultimate which was bought to the CD-GEN consoles)
#34
Guest_mr marine
Posted 15 May 2008 - 06:45 AM
#35
Guest_Yougeki
Posted 06 June 2008 - 08:38 PM
#36
Guest_Joritiger
Posted 09 June 2008 - 02:49 AM
#37
Guest_fakemaker
Posted 09 June 2008 - 03:42 AM
#38
Guest_osirus201
Posted 03 July 2008 - 08:26 PM
MK isnt MK without the blood and fatalities its crazyDefinitely about 10 years too late on that front. The only viable reason for this game is to pop back at the next gen big fighters. I love how he's coming up with the stupidest reasons for Superman to be weaker than he usually is, lolllllllllll what a tool.
#39
Guest_gamepopper
Posted 03 July 2008 - 10:28 PM
- Why DC, the only good character I know they have is Batman but what about Marvel or Archie?
- It won't be as violent
- I bet they'll have Mr Freeze
- Robin will suck
- You can't imagine it ever being great!
#40
Posted 04 July 2008 - 10:35 AM
There is no way anyone in Archie is capable of actual fighting.And currently Activision holds most of the rights to produce videogames based on Marvel Characters.Therefore there are no Marvel characters. And once again I am reminded that there will be no Marvel vs Capcom 3.
Edited by =-/, 04 July 2008 - 10:36 AM.

Hey, does anyone have a Tokusatsu userbar? Come on. There's gotta be one right? What's Tokusatsu you say? BLASPHEMY. SPACIUM RAY!
boomp3.com
Sigs
Sosica
#41
Guest_Ryan76903
Posted 07 July 2008 - 04:53 AM













