5.5/10Plain. Plus it's too pixelized on the left.
Rate the Above Poster's Sig (have a sig or you'll be warned)
Started by
Guest_Funsize
, Mar 20 2005 11:50 PM
3275 replies to this topic
#176
Opulent Maelstrom
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 847 posts
Sloth
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 03 April 2005 - 05:58 PM
#177
Guest_Der Konig
Guest_Der Konig
-
- Guest
Posted 03 April 2005 - 07:08 PM
meh, good blending, but the brushing is a bit bland6.5/10
#178
Guest_rats42
Guest_rats42
-
- Guest
Posted 03 April 2005 - 07:59 PM
meh, 5/10 render is horribly blended, text doesn't fit, pixel font is hard to read, brushing is decentedit: oh, and teck, your new sig is CRAZY!
Edited by rats42, 03 April 2005 - 08:00 PM.
#179
Guest_Krayz
Guest_Krayz
-
- Guest
Posted 03 April 2005 - 11:46 PM
2/10, the sig is utter crap, there is nothing going for it AT ALL.
#180
Duce
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 1,349 posts
THE FUCKIN OLD SCHOOL
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 04 April 2005 - 12:07 AM
i beg to differ on rats42s but im rating yours krayzyou have the right elements for a good sig. Everything could work and look really good. Try changing the text adding a bit more depth. The positions of the renders are good though they could be blended a lil more. I get why you used the text to make it look like an advertisement I just think that i could be better. Also the border on the inside doesnt look good.Overall its a solid 7/10
An old timer with bad habits, cigarettes, and a bottle of run
DGEmu's Beloved Son.
#181
Guest_Krayz
Guest_Krayz
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 12:10 AM
I love that sig you have right now 9/10Oh, and its from this: www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/29/Ah I see, very funny. I get why you used those fonts now. I still think they could be better 
- Il Duce
- Il Duce
#182
Guest_rats42
Guest_rats42
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 01:47 AM
4/10brushing lacks depth, renders arent blended, text is horrible (never use unnessecary bevels, if you do youse bevel, try to not use so much)when can i battle again?
#183
Guest_Funsize
Guest_Funsize
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 02:04 AM
A lot better with the render. 7.5/10. Good brushing, render is a bit over-blended. Text could be better (particularly pixel-font)
#184
Guest_Dark Nightmare
Guest_Dark Nightmare
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 02:10 AM
8/10 thats pretty nice brushing and render but blended but i dont like colour
#185
Guest_sk8boarder6789
Guest_sk8boarder6789
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 03:38 AM
6.5/10. i actually dont think this sig is to bad...i like the ideas but, the BG is empty, and the text needs work
#186
Duce
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 1,349 posts
THE FUCKIN OLD SCHOOL
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 04 April 2005 - 03:40 AM
background needs depth and the text needs work.6/10
An old timer with bad habits, cigarettes, and a bottle of run
DGEmu's Beloved Son.
#187
Guest_Kira the ultimate killer
Guest_Kira the ultimate killer
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 03:49 AM
8/10
#188
Guest_rats42
Guest_rats42
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 06:59 AM
animation is choppy, brushing is bland, and the multicolor looks pretty bad5/10
Edited by rats42, 04 April 2005 - 07:00 AM.
#189
Guest_Krayz
Guest_Krayz
-
- Guest
Posted 04 April 2005 - 11:46 PM
render overblended, overused bg style, and bad text = 3.5/10
#190
Guest_sk8boarder6789
Guest_sk8boarder6789
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 02:46 AM
7/10. i like the BG but its a little too crowded.
#191
Guest_rats42
Guest_rats42
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 03:07 AM
4/10just blandvery very blandand krayz, my bg style is overused? you dont even know how i made itand you cant make anything half as good
Edited by rats42, 05 April 2005 - 03:07 AM.
#192
Guest_Der Konig
Guest_Der Konig
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:03 AM
meh, its not bad, just change the brushing a bit by her face, and um maybe brighten it up a bit, bot thats optional7/10
#193
Guest_Krayz
Guest_Krayz
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:08 AM
rofl, we'll see in 2 days when I kick you @ss8/10 for Kaze-'s not spectacular, but does everything right.4/10just blandvery very blandand krayz, my bg style is overused? you dont even know how i made itand you cant make anything half as good
#194
Guest_rats42
Guest_rats42
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:39 AM
4/10brushing lacks depth, renders arent blended, text is horrible (never use unnessecary bevels, if you do youse bevel, try to not use so much)
#195
Guest_Fallen Angel
Guest_Fallen Angel
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 08:14 AM
Don't know why krayz gave you a 3.5/10pixel font sux,text is o.k. although you should've just made it black and renders overblended...overall I think its your best sig yet7.5/10
#196
StrykrOmega
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 1,801 posts
Fallen but not Forgotten
Reputation: 4
Neutral
Posted 05 April 2005 - 08:18 AM
well defently unique. better than i can ever do at the moment(but im getting better) i like the render, even though i have no idea of what render it is, i dont understand the "SR" at the top left corner, but overall, i would give it a 7.5/10.
#197
Guest_rats42
Guest_rats42
-
- Guest
Posted 05 April 2005 - 08:23 AM
render to the right is a little to smalltext should stand out a little less7.5/10as for the sr in fa's sig, his other name is silent realityand krayz hates me, think people would figure that out already
Edited by rats42, 05 April 2005 - 08:24 AM.
#198
Guest_Fallen Angel
Guest_Fallen Angel
-
- Guest
Posted 06 April 2005 - 10:05 PM
Like I said before 7.5 out of tenMade a new sig...reverted back to my old style somewhat ^^...
#199
Opulent Maelstrom
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 847 posts
Sloth
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 06 April 2005 - 10:49 PM
That sig is... it's just... *bows before Fallen Angel*The best sig you've made IMO, and one of the 3-5 best sigs I saw here.
#200
Guest_sk8boarder6789
Guest_sk8boarder6789
-
- Guest
Posted 06 April 2005 - 10:50 PM
i really like this one. 9/10. i like the way everything is placed and it all fits together nicely. good jobEDIT: oops, my rate was for FA's sig... ok well for teck: i'll give it a 8/10. i like it and it all fits together ok but IMO the BG is plain.
Edited by sk8boarder6789, 06 April 2005 - 11:00 PM.
