Jump to content


Rate the Above Poster's Sig (have a sig or you'll be warned)


  • Please log in to reply
3275 replies to this topic

#2126 Guest_{ling}

Guest_{ling}
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 August 2006 - 03:33 AM

Nice sig overall. If text was added I would give it a better score but still it is really well made imo. 8.5/10
  • 0

#2127 Guest_«Яề&

Guest_«Яề&
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 August 2006 - 12:04 AM

Almost perfect, almost... The white bar with 'ling' doesn't fit 8.5/10

Edited by enceps, 29 August 2006 - 12:04 AM.

  • 0

#2128 Guest_aevix

Guest_aevix
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 August 2006 - 02:10 AM

not bad, I like the render, but brushing and text could use some work. 6/10

Edited by aevix, 29 August 2006 - 02:10 AM.

  • 0

#2129 Guest_pquadro

Guest_pquadro
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 August 2006 - 06:09 PM

very cool!
  • 0

#2130 Guest_JRagnarok

Guest_JRagnarok
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 August 2006 - 08:48 PM

aevixlol i like pokemon...... not really but its nice to see somehting different once in a whilethe background doesn't really appeal to me ( those colored lines and stuff )i guess the text could use some work 6/10my sig sucks, its super old XD
  • 0

#2131 Guest_Hobo-Dragon

Guest_Hobo-Dragon
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 August 2006 - 11:05 PM

its nice though XD 8/10
  • 0

#2132 Guest_{ling}

Guest_{ling}
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:28 AM

sig is okay, reminds me of the old sega. Try going to some tut site and learning from some the the tuts. 4/10http://www.dgemu.com...showtopic=71660^resource link^
  • 0

#2133 Guest_CloudSSJ

Guest_CloudSSJ
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 August 2006 - 09:47 PM

6/10 it's a bit plain to me
  • 0

#2134 Guest_{ling}

Guest_{ling}
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 August 2006 - 11:11 PM

Sig is 151.33 KB, way over the file size limit! take it down or I will have to report you. try making it so the file size is smaller. And yeah it's okay, too "sparkly", the green splatter doesn't fit very well. 6/10
  • 0

#2135 Guest_«Яề&

Guest_«Яề&
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 September 2006 - 01:16 AM

Nice colours, but I can't read the text in the middle, or am I supposed to? Also, there is a kinda large spot with just some ligh biege. Nice blending, 7/10
  • 0

#2136 Guest_needforspeed182

Guest_needforspeed182
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 September 2006 - 03:28 PM

Nicely organized, i like it. Rate mine :D-------------RATE ME!

Edited by needforspeed182, 01 September 2006 - 03:28 PM.

  • 0

#2137 Hyper

Hyper

    Reaper Dragon

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,743 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 01 September 2006 - 05:41 PM

Hmm...I think you lowered its opacity a bit too much =PI'll rate encep's sig.The left hand side of the sig looks good,however the bg on the right side falls flat.The text's not too god,but pretty much ok.The 1px black norder looks somewhat neat.However,the sig lacks depth and looks a bit bland.5/10.
  • 0


Posted Image
.36 ^
Presents-
[Dhaos] [Kit][2][3] [cg] [Red Mage][2] [.bx] [spleen] [Reaper17] [murtagh] [ling] [pengu] [.36] [cranos] [stock]


#2138 Guest_WIS

Guest_WIS
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 September 2006 - 06:18 AM

There's a general messiness about that signature, as you cant quite tell what you're looking at. The image was optimized horribly as a JPG, making everything seem even messier than they really are. Text doesn't fit in too well, also. - 6/10
  • 0

#2139 Guest_nyppö

Guest_nyppö
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 September 2006 - 11:18 AM

It's allright, I love the idea. Though I dislike that style of tag. There is nothing wrong with it, it's really good generally.I made this earlier today for a request...Posted Image
  • 0

#2140 Guest_{ling}

Guest_{ling}
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 September 2006 - 02:54 PM

It's okay the text needs work though. Try adding a border to it. Overall nice in design. 8/10
  • 0

#2141 Guest_~Reggie Noble.aka.Pimp Nutz~

Guest_~Reggie Noble.aka.Pimp Nutz~
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 September 2006 - 08:24 PM

danmit ling how many times have i graded this danm sig its 8/10 i love the colors and the flow the text isnt really visible and plainish to me
  • 0

#2142 Guest_{ling}

Guest_{ling}
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 September 2006 - 07:27 AM

NO FREAKING SIG OMFG ARE YOU RETARDED????????? your like a damn tool aren't you. read the freaking rules before posting in here.anyways nice sig BB presonally a little too boring.7/10
  • 0

#2143 Guest_WIS

Guest_WIS
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 September 2006 - 07:57 AM

Ack! Change it back to your previous one. I absolutely loved that signature. T__TAnyways, this isn't a bad... signature... if it can really be called that. :laugh: It's unique, and the textures are smooth and dreamy. And yay, very nice PNG alpha transparency. :( I'm not sure I like the text though. I imagine that it's probably very hard to get text look right though. But good job, even though it cant really be called a sig (Just in my opinion, though). :D- 8.5/10

Edited by WIS, 03 September 2006 - 07:58 AM.

  • 0

#2144 Guest_«Яề&

Guest_«Яề&
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 September 2006 - 07:12 PM

Well, it looks like just a cut&paste job, the shoes are half on the water and don't realy fit. 4/10
  • 0

#2145 Guest_DrSneaky

Guest_DrSneaky
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 September 2006 - 09:26 PM

7.5/10 everything is good except the light at bottom and text
  • 0

#2146 Guest_yayitsjustint

Guest_yayitsjustint
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:19 AM

6/10...the renders seem to be out of place w/ the bg.I know my sig sucks though :) first attempt at vectors.
  • 0

#2147 Guest_WIS

Guest_WIS
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 September 2006 - 09:16 AM

Did you vector the character? Or just reduced it's colors? :D It looks pretty good for your first vector. However, I would reccommend you using stronger colors for the background. :rolleyes: Perhaps take colors from your stock. Also, try experimenting with Gradients as well. Not bad for your first. :( I love vector style art. - 7.5/10
  • 0

#2148 Guest_dammit_lee

Guest_dammit_lee
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 September 2006 - 10:01 PM

i rate 8/10 really nice and plain sig wis
  • 0

#2149 Guest_«Яề&

Guest_«Яề&
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 September 2006 - 12:54 AM

8.5/10 Really nice almost perfect, but I don't really think the text fitsrate this Posted Image-WARNED- for sig size.
  • 0

#2150 Guest_That Zero Guy

Guest_That Zero Guy
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 09 September 2006 - 08:36 AM

Ooh, nice picture. The effects were also done nicely.9/10
  • 0