i think that she should have to pay because if you go to a restaraunt, order something to eat they bring it out to you and you say that i have to leave they won't serve that food to someone else they have to throw it away
What If?
Started by
Guest_blackhawk808
, Jul 16 2008 03:20 PM
461 replies to this topic
#227
Guest_*Lola*
Guest_*Lola*
-
- Guest
Posted 26 May 2009 - 01:52 PM
I think she should because she still went in and sat down.Did she order the tea? If so then she should pay.However its ashame that she didnt actually drink any.
#228
Guest_mario1212
Guest_mario1212
-
- Guest
Posted 26 May 2009 - 04:23 PM
Yes, I think she should pay because that wasn't her tea it was the restraunt's.
#229
Guest_fogfactor
Guest_fogfactor
-
- Guest
Posted 28 May 2009 - 11:31 PM
No, she should not have to pay for the tea, since the tea is complementory just like the bread at olive garden.
#230
Guest_pooinghippo
Guest_pooinghippo
-
- Guest
Posted 29 May 2009 - 12:49 AM
You pay for the preperation of food/drink!You don't pay per bite... If food or drink has been prepared as your ordered it, then you have to pay!You don't get anorexics just ordering food for the hell of it, and then just wandering out...
#231
Guest_FelixIsaac
Guest_FelixIsaac
-
- Guest
Posted 29 May 2009 - 02:51 AM
If she didn't ask for it, no. If she did, then definitely yes! But since she has to pay she should drink some anyways and then pay for it.
#232
Guest_Dragon Spirit
Guest_Dragon Spirit
-
- Guest
Posted 29 May 2009 - 04:04 AM
I've done something like this before. I went into a place and ordered drinks for me and my friend. Got the menu and was looking at it but decided I didn't want to eat there. I gave the waiter $10 to pay for the drinks and a small tip because of my stupid idea and wasting his time.
#233
Guest_supernerdboy
Guest_supernerdboy
-
- Guest
Posted 08 June 2009 - 12:42 PM
It was the waiter's fault for bringing tea and why would the two stop having a conversation, it could easily be unnoticed.I found myself in a similar dilemma. In a restaurant where they brought out bread before the menu. I took a piece and after seeing the menu I realized there wasn't anything that I wanted in the restaurant. I ended up staying anyways, ignoring the dilemma. But if the waiter had asked me to pay for it, I would have if it wasn't expensive. If it was overpriced, hell no. I feel that the women should not have to pay however as she didn't order the kettle and could parhaps not have noticed it. It was the waiter's fault for putting the kettle out without asking.
#234
Ezekeil
-
- Member
-
- 51 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 09 June 2009 - 03:47 AM
yes she should pay! its not nice to get food from a resturant and then refuse to pay! she has problems...
The things that will destroy us are the ones we hold most dear.
Ferrari= my dream car.
The Ferrari Fund is at $20.67!
Ferrari= my dream car.
The Ferrari Fund is at $20.67!
#235
Guest_Link187
Guest_Link187
-
- Guest
Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:17 PM
if she niether ordered or drank any of it.. then no she should not have to pay for the tea.
#236
Guest_THEKILLINNDN
Guest_THEKILLINNDN
-
- Guest
Posted 07 July 2009 - 06:30 PM
kind of mixed on the situation. while she didn't eat or drink anything, thus she shouldn't have to pay, she took up time and space in the restaurant that could have been used for paying customers. all businesses are interested in profits, so they will nickel and dime for anything that is possible. the expression "time is money" holds true for all businesses, which explains why they are relentless about payment
#237
Guest_StentorianNinja
Guest_StentorianNinja
-
- Guest
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:15 PM
well, regardless if she ordered it or not.. i think yes. how rude is it to waltz into a restaurant and sit down, order nothing.. then leave? you would think that some payment is due for making the waiter work.
#238
Guest_smilylover
Guest_smilylover
-
- Guest
Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:28 PM
She should. She ordered it off the menu and somebody has to be paid for making the tea.
#239
Guest_kyakoomo
Guest_kyakoomo
-
- Guest
Posted 13 July 2009 - 01:11 AM
I agree with smilylover. The woman should pay because the tea would have never been made if she didn't order it. If she left before the tea reached the table I would change my answer to NO.
#240
Guest_Veriantor
Guest_Veriantor
-
- Guest
Posted 13 July 2009 - 02:32 AM
If she didn't order anything then she shouldn't have to pay.
#241
Guest_48henny
Guest_48henny
-
- Guest
Posted 13 July 2009 - 07:21 AM
well i guess, yes....so that, she not make trouble with restaurant altough the one who need to get it must be her friend,...and if she meet her friend again, she can tell her about what happen and ask her friend to get back her money....if her friend avoid it, she can show a receipt that she got from that restaurant to her friend...CASE CLOSED!!! 
Happy End! 
Happy End!
#242
Guest_inuashakent
Guest_inuashakent
-
- Guest
Posted 13 July 2009 - 07:37 AM
Lol, yeah. I would say she should pay.
#243
Guest_-Sanguine
Guest_-Sanguine
-
- Guest
Posted 21 July 2009 - 04:17 AM
Noooooooooooo~...don't pay! If the waiter just out the tea kettle down on the table without them ordering it and they didn't drink from it, then they do not need to pay!
#244
Guest_ddrisawesome
Guest_ddrisawesome
-
- Guest
Posted 21 July 2009 - 04:51 AM
nooo, like lots of people already said, she didnt order the tea, the waiter just put it on the table, and she didnt even drink any of it anyway
#245
Guest_undefinable
Guest_undefinable
-
- Guest
Posted 27 July 2009 - 09:05 AM
i would not even pay for the tea. there's no point since she didn't drink it at all.
#246
Guest_Mekka123
Guest_Mekka123
-
- Guest
Posted 27 July 2009 - 11:27 AM
I think she should pay because the waiter did a service by serving the tea to her and she is using the facility of the restraunt.
#247
Guest_That Guy. You know. Him
Guest_That Guy. You know. Him
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:48 AM
She shouldn't pay and she shouldn't care about the waiter threatening to call the manager either. What's the manager really going to be mad about if she asked to boil some water? they can just let it cool and boil the water later...
#248
DAZZ192
-
- Dragon's Guard
-
- 918 posts
Gundam Addict
Reputation: 14
Neutral
Posted 28 July 2009 - 09:33 AM
no! she shouldnt pay for the tea she didnt even order it in the first place. Its like me giving everyone a PS3 and commanding everyone to pay $450(i know its no worth that much) up front for it even though you didnt ask for it. You really cant ask somone to pay money if you didnt ask for it, it's just not fair.
Steam
New Deviantart
Old Deviantart
Is the cat in the box alive or dead?
If you open the box, you will know the answer.
You will know the truth.
However, until you open the box, you can claim that the cat is alive, and you can also claim it is dead.
#249
Guest_darkdeath85
Guest_darkdeath85
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2009 - 10:02 AM
She doesn't need to pay for the tea is she did not drink it and if she did not order it. But if the waiter said that the tea cost something and that she needed to pay for it, then she needs to pay for it. Not only should she pay for the tea, but she should also pay for the service because there was no point in going to the restraunt. In other words she just wasted time and a seat for someelse that was actually going to eat there.
Edited by darkdeath85, 28 July 2009 - 10:07 AM.
#250
Guest_Rusty Av3ng3r
Guest_Rusty Av3ng3r
-
- Guest
Posted 28 July 2009 - 12:17 PM
it should be both of you pay...then split the change. sorted.
