[OFFICIAL] How many Shakespeare plays have you studied
#126
Guest_Jarvis
Posted 29 May 2007 - 11:29 AM
#127
Guest_winglet
Posted 29 May 2007 - 02:01 PM
#128
Guest_Shad_ow
Posted 29 May 2007 - 03:01 PM
#129
Guest_starfrAgments
Posted 30 May 2007 - 07:35 AM
#130
Guest_Roger Rabbit
Posted 31 May 2007 - 04:44 PM
#131
Guest_Serene Dream
Posted 31 May 2007 - 07:36 PM
I agree almost completely with this. While there are some touching parts in the story, it just seems way too fickle. Romeo's just getting over Rosaline, and then -boom- there Juliet and he loves her and Rosaline was nothing. I wouldn't call this play a complete failure...The ending is romantic at least (if melodramatic), and Mercutio is a hilarious character. I think it teaches that if two people are in love with one another, their families shouldn't get in their way, that love should be allowed to blossom. But, at the same time, it also seems like a glorified lust story, as Vicious said.Romeo and Juliet is not a love story. It's a lust story. It's one of Shakespeare's great failures I think. It's just a rubbish story that for some odd reason has gotten massive fanfare. Basically.. Romeo, who at the beginning of the play is in love with Rosaline, meets Juliet at a party.. they decide after a brief meeting to run off and get married (both of these people, mind you, are teenagers) in secret. Then Romeo, the brilliant kid he is, kills Juliet's cousin and is forced to flee and Juliet, rather than admit she's already married, is about to be forced to marry someone else.. So she pretends to kill herself, Romeo sees this and kills himself, then Juliet wakes up and kills herself. The only reason they got married was so they could legally have sex. It's so.. pathetic. On top of all that, we run around and teach teenagers this (since it is required reading in most H.S.) and romanticize the idea of suicide. Great idea. This honestly is not a love story. There is nothing remotely about love in the whole thing. It's a lust story and once you've realized that, it's really pathetic. It's not even a very good tragedy.Oh and if you're going to say what right do i have to say any of this, I studied this play twice in my life.. Once was with a Shakespearian scholar who adored Shakespeare and everything he wrote.. except this piece. Shakespeare has much, much better.. Like Hamlet (for tragedies) or A MidSummer's Night's Dream (for Comedies).
#132
Guest_kraug
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:08 AM
#133
Guest_Matt H
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:22 AM
#134
Guest_victor85
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:19 AM
#135
Guest_demonicbooger
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:55 AM
#136
Guest_Nbjm911
Posted 01 June 2007 - 08:51 PM
#137
Guest_Caskey_91
Posted 07 June 2007 - 10:07 PM
#138
Guest_DiceK
Posted 08 June 2007 - 01:43 PM
#139
Guest_jackcentricity
Posted 12 June 2007 - 12:16 AM
#140
Posted 12 June 2007 - 12:19 AM
I read that same book, my teacher wanted me to read it too and we didn't have to act it out but we had to read it and watch the movie of it.To be, or not to... aw sod it *goes and finds a beer*I studied "A Midsummer Night's Dream" in class a few months gone, it was kind of weird because the teacher made us act it out, but beyond that, it was good, most of Shakespeare's work is good, just fairly boring (I think) to read.
#141
Guest_Wispen
Posted 14 June 2007 - 10:02 AM
#142
Guest_Richnz
Posted 01 August 2007 - 08:00 AM
#143
Guest_Staglianos
Posted 01 August 2007 - 10:35 AM
#144
Guest_FireEmblemFreak2
Posted 01 August 2007 - 11:30 AM
#145
Guest_pinksoda90
Posted 02 August 2007 - 07:31 AM
#146
Guest_revilonerraw
Posted 02 August 2007 - 07:34 AM
#147
Guest_vas8886
Posted 02 August 2007 - 08:10 AM
#148
Guest_alpha123456789
Posted 02 August 2007 - 08:14 AM
#149
Guest_ZPaladinZ
Posted 02 August 2007 - 08:15 AM
#150
Guest_alpha123456789
Posted 02 August 2007 - 08:16 AM
I mean mcbeth just mcduff is pretty strong you knowonly mcduffbut they are still all pretty boring I think











