Jump to content


Sig update


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Poll: Which sig's better? (8 member(s) have cast votes)

Which sig's better?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Guest_«ArchAngel»

Guest_«ArchAngel»
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:24 PM

hey guys tell me what's the best of these 2. I just made them:1. Posted Image2. Posted Imagepls just coment them, ( don't ask me how and with what i did them :( )

Edited by DarkS, 01 April 2005 - 09:36 PM.

  • 0

#2 StrykrOmega

StrykrOmega

    Fallen but not Forgotten

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,801 posts
Offline
Current mood: Yee Haw
Reputation: 4
Neutral

Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:27 PM

i like the 1st one more, but they both look choppy.
  • 0

Posted Image


#3 Guest_«ArchAngel»

Guest_«ArchAngel»
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:39 PM

thanks 4 your opinions (i just udated the second)and id like somethin like "this sig suks because..." not just "this sig's suks" :( i'd apreciate it

Edited by DarkS, 01 April 2005 - 09:55 PM.

  • 0

#4 StrykrOmega

StrykrOmega

    Fallen but not Forgotten

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,801 posts
Offline
Current mood: Yee Haw
Reputation: 4
Neutral

Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:49 PM

for the render in the secound one, you need to take the backround off first, because with the backround on the render, it doesnt look like it good. if it was just the pic of seshomaru, without the wierd backround, it would look better.
  • 0

Posted Image


#5 Guest_sk8boarder6789

Guest_sk8boarder6789
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:52 PM

i think the second one looks better. just get rid of the original BG around the render. IMO the first one is too plain and empty. and make it smaller. they are both really big (file size)
  • 0

#6 Guest_«ArchAngel»

Guest_«ArchAngel»
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:58 PM

now this is the cind of reply i come 2 aspect of u guys. i'l worck more on the second@sk8boarder6789 u mean they're 2 big?? i don't think so

Edited by DarkS, 01 April 2005 - 09:59 PM.

  • 0

#7 Guest_sk8boarder6789

Guest_sk8boarder6789
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 10:08 PM

your second one is 418.81 KB.... thats big... right click it and look at its properties
  • 0

#8 Guest_«ArchAngel»

Guest_«ArchAngel»
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 10:25 PM

I know that! I was sayng that they boulth are in the limites (and that suits me fine)
  • 0

#9 Guest_oso_fast

Guest_oso_fast
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 10:30 PM

The text looks like it doesnt really fit in
  • 0

#10 Guest_rats42

Guest_rats42
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 April 2005 - 10:36 PM

I know that! I was sayng that they boulth are in the limites (and that suits me fine)

theyre not in the limits
  • 0

#11 Guest_Dark Nightmare

Guest_Dark Nightmare
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 02 April 2005 - 12:56 AM

i perfeone t both arnt so good maybe remover the lines on 1st one red one is just choppy :(
  • 0

#12 Guest_«ArchAngel»

Guest_«ArchAngel»
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2005 - 09:03 PM

to rats42

theyre not in the limits

Say what??? what do u mean? can U tell me what's out of the limits please? Id apreciate itto oso_fast

  The text looks like it doesnt really fit in

at wich sig? or at boulth?to Dark Nightmare

i perfeone t both arnt so good maybe remover the lines on 1st one red one is just choppy

i'l say it as many times as i have to : WHEN U POST A COMENT SAY WHY IT'S THE WAY U SAY IT IS (just goes 2 proof u don't read the first posts)

Edited by DarkS, 05 April 2005 - 09:22 PM.

  • 0

#13 Guest_«ArchAngel»

Guest_«ArchAngel»
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 April 2005 - 10:36 PM

resolution size you know..(and i respected them)
  • 0