Jump to content


Does Twilight suck?


  • Please log in to reply
251 replies to this topic

#201 Guest_HawkEyeX

Guest_HawkEyeX
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:42 AM

Finally. At my school everybody talks about how awesome Twilight is.And then there is me with like 3 other people thinking ..... please be quite, half of us don't care.
  • 0

#202 Guest_Sazarael

Guest_Sazarael
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:58 PM

I like Twilight. I enjoyed the story. The fact that it doesn't portray the classical vampire doesn't bother me, it's a fiction novel for crying out loud! I think it was creatively done, and the only reason there's so much controversy over it is because it was such a popular series.
  • 0

#203 Guest_Nahnsan

Guest_Nahnsan
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:29 AM

I didnt think twilight sucked but i would say it wasnt good.I didnt think twilight sucked but i would say it wasnt good.I didnt think twilight sucked but i would say it wasnt good.GPs were deducted for this post, please read the rules! - shadowmanwkp
  • 0

#204 Guest_dorzan

Guest_dorzan
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 September 2010 - 04:28 PM

I don't get why so many people like twilight, it isn't that good!One of the things that really bugs me out is the fact that she ( the writer) changed all the "vampire rules"! "Real" vampires don't sparkle people.
  • 0

#205 Guest_majoodah

Guest_majoodah
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 17 September 2010 - 08:46 PM

twilight totally ruined the cool side of vampires..i lyk it as a romance/drama saga, but not as a vampire one..if we're talking vampires id rather read/watch vampire diaries, the writer managed to get to wat meyer was trying to do without excluding any real vampire killingss.. i love it!
  • 0

#206 Guest_Hakunio

Guest_Hakunio
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 September 2010 - 05:18 AM

While I thought like the first 5 chapters of the first book were pretty... goodish.. it got bad after that. Same for the movie, and the movie covers those chapters in like 4 minuets anyways... so yh it sucks
  • 0

#207 Guest_ELITExSNIPEzZ

Guest_ELITExSNIPEzZ
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 September 2010 - 11:21 AM

im not a super crazy fan, but iam one of those guys who said thats gay... well if you watch it, its actually a pretty good movie...well if you like supernatural type things atleast.
  • 0

#208 Guest_Porcelain Jade

Guest_Porcelain Jade
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 September 2010 - 07:55 PM

Oh GAWD. I HATE Twilight with a passion. I USED to like it back when I was like in Middle School when it first came out. But then I grew a bigger brain and realized how bad the books are. Not to mention they set a bad example for young teens in this generation. I mean, It's basically saying, It's okay to be a mindless, lovesick twit who allows herself to be emotionally abused by a man.
  • 0

#209 Guest_cayer

Guest_cayer
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 30 September 2010 - 10:19 AM

It is great movie,i watched it for twice.
  • 0

#210 Guest_benjaminlibl

Guest_benjaminlibl
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 October 2010 - 12:56 PM

I haven't read the books, but in the movie, the protaganist is one of the most confused girls I've seen. Not a very good example to young girls out there.
  • 0

#211 Guest_de la Mar

Guest_de la Mar
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 08 October 2010 - 05:08 PM

Yes, it does. At least, for me.The first time I read it, I really didn't understand what was so special about it. I mean, first and foremost, there are just... too many unnecessary words. I swear, I kept getting distracted because it seemed as if I was reading a dictionary. Second, I didn't like how the main character (who's POV we are reading from) kept describing how perfect Edward was. I mean, okay, we get it, he's beautiful and perfect. There's no need to repeat it thrice or so.And lastly, I didn't like the character of Edward Cullen (who is technically mentioned almost everywhere in every book). He's a possessive, crazy little vampire teen.But yeah, those are just my opinions. :channel:

Edited by de la Mar, 08 October 2010 - 05:10 PM.

  • 0

#212 TheMadHatterTF

TheMadHatterTF

    Egg

  • Active Member
  • Pip
  • 40 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 18 October 2010 - 04:11 PM

The Reasoning Behind Why I Hate Twilight (along with Stephen King) by TheMadHatterI agree with the first post to this thread, Bram Stoker's Dracula is awesome and should be the vampires that still roam the living imagination. Of course, I take into account that "women" in general (apologies to those that have xenophilia enough to like Vampires) like vampires because they're... um... sexy. But, Bram Stoker defines the creature well and whole. Those who walk in eternal days with mortal's souls perish longer and are bedded deeper into sins than any man they encounter solely for keeping their existence secret and their lives peaceful without much human intervention out of the norm. Dracula in Stoker's mind's eye is suffering from the forever ailment of man which is loneliness, acquired with man's prideful fury and distorted sense of justice. Powerful stuff to imbibe, I must say.But, nevertheless, more meaningful than your everyday run-of-the-mill tirade of having vampires loiter around the human world without source of reason other than peace and sex. Dracula longed for the only company he sought--the company of his love. Though, future renditions seem to steeple into the normal human thirsts and there comes greed and several other unnecessary sods out of the beaten historical psychopathology. Hence, my hatred for the Twilight saga.Why would they bother with a war against another bloodline with equal wants such as peace and habitat rights? If they were supposedly to trespass the wolves would have done a pact with them to stay out of society and live as hermits so to not pass on ergonomics of their kind. Lycanthropes are said to have a deep understanding of Gaia's sights and her people as well as the unfathomable burdens that come and stay or disappear. Having knowledge of their traits to be loyal to their Giver and Mother as well as guardians, to have the bloodsuckers have their way into a society is preposterous especially in their awareness and foresight of disastrous events. Such things would have long been settled. Even in the twilight saga, the lycanthropes are deep in ancestry and world ways. The lineage of competent lycans would have been able to ward off any unnecessary dangers.Another thing, even though they are teenagers... and, admittedly such acts of affection are evident, why publicise it with much rambunctiousness? And un-aplaudable writing skills--she has yet to master the art of discretion in choosing synonyms to drag a scene or chapter longer.In addition, the running commentary on the vampires' and lycans' looks. Indeed, there is sound reasoning behind wehy they have to be good looking, as for the vampires. But... the sparkles? Who the bl**ding **** would like Mr Sparkles as a boyfriend? Enough said.The sparkles are self-damaging in what way? They do not uphold in the light the self-battering and collective abuse that Edward Cullen gives to the Twilight universe characters. He respects his "family" though pacifies with rashness and impartiality. Impartiality because he doesn't consider the backlashes of emotional pain and effort for two people to be together with such differences and he goes and pushes the girl into his world where she isn't even aware of the dangers and still the girl persits...Plain blind faith is all well and good in blooming love... I would've just liked the blind faith in puppy love aura... then the girl does something stupid all together. Edward has given a good description of isolation and despair his kind takes--the girl decides to be bitten on prom night.Yeah. Stupidity at its grandest. She had just experienced the pain of being infected and has been given the description beforehand as Cullen so provides with the subtility of a sledgehammer.Yes.Now, at the end of my rant. I bid you all this quote, "Diamond Skin, the Jazz Hands Of The Vampire World." -Iann Robinson
  • 0

#213 Guest_Morfin'

Guest_Morfin'
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 22 October 2010 - 04:17 PM

The Reasoning Behind Why I Hate Twilight (along with Stephen King) by TheMadHatterI agree with the first post to this thread, Bram Stoker's Dracula is awesome and should be the vampires that still roam the living imagination. Of course, I take into account that "women" in general (apologies to those that have xenophilia enough to like Vampires) like vampires because they're... um... sexy. But, Bram Stoker defines the creature well and whole. Those who walk in eternal days with mortal's souls perish longer and are bedded deeper into sins than any man they encounter solely for keeping their existence secret and their lives peaceful without much human intervention out of the norm. Dracula in Stoker's mind's eye is suffering from the forever ailment of man which is loneliness, acquired with man's prideful fury and distorted sense of justice. Powerful stuff to imbibe, I must say.But, nevertheless, more meaningful than your everyday run-of-the-mill tirade of having vampires loiter around the human world without source of reason other than peace and sex. Dracula longed for the only company he sought--the company of his love. Though, future renditions seem to steeple into the normal human thirsts and there comes greed and several other unnecessary sods out of the beaten historical psychopathology. Hence, my hatred for the Twilight saga.Why would they bother with a war against another bloodline with equal wants such as peace and habitat rights? If they were supposedly to trespass the wolves would have done a pact with them to stay out of society and live as hermits so to not pass on ergonomics of their kind. Lycanthropes are said to have a deep understanding of Gaia's sights and her people as well as the unfathomable burdens that come and stay or disappear. Having knowledge of their traits to be loyal to their Giver and Mother as well as guardians, to have the bloodsuckers have their way into a society is preposterous especially in their awareness and foresight of disastrous events. Such things would have long been settled. Even in the twilight saga, the lycanthropes are deep in ancestry and world ways. The lineage of competent lycans would have been able to ward off any unnecessary dangers.Another thing, even though they are teenagers... and, admittedly such acts of affection are evident, why publicise it with much rambunctiousness? And un-aplaudable writing skills--she has yet to master the art of discretion in choosing synonyms to drag a scene or chapter longer.In addition, the running commentary on the vampires' and lycans' looks. Indeed, there is sound reasoning behind wehy they have to be good looking, as for the vampires. But... the sparkles? Who the bl**ding **** would like Mr Sparkles as a boyfriend? Enough said.The sparkles are self-damaging in what way? They do not uphold in the light the self-battering and collective abuse that Edward Cullen gives to the Twilight universe characters. He respects his "family" though pacifies with rashness and impartiality. Impartiality because he doesn't consider the backlashes of emotional pain and effort for two people to be together with such differences and he goes and pushes the girl into his world where she isn't even aware of the dangers and still the girl persits...Plain blind faith is all well and good in blooming love... I would've just liked the blind faith in puppy love aura... then the girl does something stupid all together. Edward has given a good description of isolation and despair his kind takes--the girl decides to be bitten on prom night.Yeah. Stupidity at its grandest. She had just experienced the pain of being infected and has been given the description beforehand as Cullen so provides with the subtility of a sledgehammer.Yes.Now, at the end of my rant. I bid you all this quote, "Diamond Skin, the Jazz Hands Of The Vampire World." -Iann Robinson

Hmm....for someone who hates twilight, you seem to have spent an awful lot of time in making such a concise hate speech about it. Really, you seem to have covered all the incongruities of the plot. I commend you, you Twilight-watching Twilight-hater.BTW i am part of the remaining 2% of the teenage population after Meyer said that breathing wasn't cool...
  • 0

#214 Guest_oh dear

Guest_oh dear
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:02 PM

Yep it obviously sucka ts just another "handsome" guy again who stands around and does nothing BORING!
  • 0

#215 Guest_kenyk713

Guest_kenyk713
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 01 November 2010 - 08:50 PM

you bring up an interesting point... i had no idea that these twilight movies and books had completely messed up the classic image of the vampire. that sucks.... i knew girls were going crazy bout this stuff, but i thought it was jus cuz girls dig vampires. but your description shows the twilight vampires as total pansies. i've always been a fan of the badass vampire like in underworld, but this seems pathetic... i can't really judge cuz i haven't seen or read any of the works, but if your description is accurate, then twilight's gotta be crappy indeed
  • 0

#216 The Mothman

The Mothman

    The Monster of Mason County

  • Active Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 805 posts
Offline
Current mood: Innocent
Reputation: 3
Neutral

Posted 03 November 2010 - 03:44 AM

I do dislike it. Not because it's one of the more popular series right now, but because it just doesn't interest me. The Twilight books and movies are basically of the romance genre. Most romance novels are not my cup of tea.
  • 0

#217 Guest_cranberrywalnut

Guest_cranberrywalnut
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 November 2010 - 09:34 AM

I guess i don't really like the series, bored me outta my mind. Everyone was comparing it to Harry Potter so i picked up book one. read it through kept thinking it'll get better. nope. so then i tried to read the 2nd book thinking maybe it'll be better here. (i mean c'mon so many people like it so much there has to be a reason) half way through there was this scene where he leaves her and she like more or less kills herself. and they had these few pages with just the names of months trying to symbolize how her life was nothing without him. i... laughed my ass off. put the book down and haven't picked it up since. the only thing that truly irritated me about the series was that they have the gall to compare it to Harry Potter.
  • 0

#218 Guest_MarlboroLights

Guest_MarlboroLights
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 November 2010 - 01:02 PM

IMO The book is better than the movie, but to compare to Harry Potter, man it's so ridiculous. yeah the romance are kind of boring too , this saga is only suited for girls
  • 0

#219 Guest_redG7B

Guest_redG7B
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:39 AM

i havent watched it yet but it doesnt look very entertaining to meGPs were deducted for this post, please read the rules! - tedsb16
  • 0

#220 grshen80

grshen80

    Serpent

  • Active Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 200 posts
Offline
Current mood: Cloud 9
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 30 November 2010 - 03:43 AM

I liked Twilight the first time I read it. It was kind of nice, and it was new, and I had time, and people said it was good, so I read it.That was as long as it lasted for me, lol. I don't HATE Twilight, per se, but I like other book series far better. I tried to reread Breaking Dawn - it didn't work for me. I just didn't find it as intriguing as I did the first time I read it... (cough Harry Potter is better cough):3
  • 0
There are two levers for moving men, interest and fear.
Men are more easily governed through their vices than their virtues.


:Napoleon Bonaparte

#221 stormsabrewin

stormsabrewin

    Twin Blade User

  • Dragon's Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 688 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 30 November 2010 - 11:04 AM

i think the whole vampire thing has gone downhill... remember the good old days, wen vampires were beast that were only keepin the humans around because thats there food source... and then a black halfbread would come in and start kickin a**... none of this "omg i love u so much, but i cant be with u because i might suck ur blood"
  • 0

#222 Guest_weirdsports

Guest_weirdsports
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 03 December 2010 - 04:29 AM

Twilight, to me, is just like a parody of a badly written fanfiction. I mean come on! Meyer and her overuse of adjectives describing edward as "godlike" really makes it so. As well as the fact that probably half the book is spent describing how edward looks. Okay I wouldn't know. The first (and last) time I tried reading it, I fell asleep. I did so too during the movie. But I did read a hilarious review somewhere where someone actually bothered counting out the number of times she describes his skin, face, hair etc and it was hilarious. So yeah. Not really a supporter of twilight.
  • 0

#223 Guest_Phoenixluverization259

Guest_Phoenixluverization259
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 31 January 2011 - 03:26 PM

I agree with you COMPLETELY! twilight sucks!what's with all of those love parody anyway? Harry Potter is much better than this third-grade love parody!
  • 0

#224 Nasty_Nate

Nasty_Nate

    Egg

  • Active Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 04 February 2011 - 09:45 PM

Ewww! TWILIGHT sucks... doesnt really get my attention
  • 0

#225 Guest_bowens22

Guest_bowens22
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 February 2011 - 11:29 PM

Yes, twilight sucks. unless you are on the bandwagon you fanboy
  • 0