Ah my friend, it isn't that the only way to get high from marijuana is to do it because it is illegal, but that is some of the allure it has. That same allure could plausibly draw the attention of kids to other more dangerous drugs if marijuana were to be legalized. I'll tell you, there used to be something about drinking that was exhilarating while under age. It fades after a while, and I'm sure after the thrill of being able to drink whenever I want at 21 fades, the distant friend of that exhilarating feeling will be all but forgotten.The idea that the high kids are looking to get from weed is caused by knowing it's illegal is the funniest thing I have ever heard. It is nice to know that some of the only arguments against weed are as laughable as this. And even if they institute an age based limit on legalized weed I'll smoke a bowl for the lovely THC, not the thrill of an MIP.
Legalization of Marijuana
#451
Guest_Phenomenonsense
Posted 18 June 2009 - 11:04 AM
#453
Guest_G.O.D.
Posted 19 June 2009 - 02:24 AM
Sure the thrill may fade, but I know plenty of people that, after a hard day of work, enjoy being able to kick up their feet and have a drink as a way to relax and let go of the worries of the day. Why should the same idea not apply to pot? And if we were to stiffen the penalties enough for other drugs, which are the real danger to society anyway, what's to say that the distribution and use of said drugs (like crack, meth, coke, ex, and the most quickly growing problem, perscription pills) would decline. Kids will always find a way to get intoxicated. I've even heard of kids huffing the fumes from urine and feces (try regulating that), so the idea that they won't is ridiculous. But as kids are naturally more inclined to be immature and.... well.... dangerous, do we want to enforce that or allow them more access to a substance that will inhibit destructive behavior. Where I come from if you are looking for pot, get ready to hunt. But if you want speed, you have only to ask. I think this a backward standard that should be dealt with as quickly as possible. Also, drug testing is a joke. Marijuana stays in your system for an average of 28 days, whereas meth only stays in your system for 72 hours (as far as I understand). This seems to me to be a way of condoning, or allowing one, while discriminating against the other. Don't get me wrong, there are some jobs that I do not want the guy doing them to be high (brain surgeon), but it is never okay for someone to be a raging speed addict. Functional addict or not, they are dangerous. The most dangerous thing you might do on pot is watch spongebob until your eyes bleed or laugh yourself into a heart attack.Ah my friend, it isn't that the only way to get high from marijuana is to do it because it is illegal, but that is some of the allure it has. That same allure could plausibly draw the attention of kids to other more dangerous drugs if marijuana were to be legalized. I'll tell you, there used to be something about drinking that was exhilarating while under age. It fades after a while, and I'm sure after the thrill of being able to drink whenever I want at 21 fades, the distant friend of that exhilarating feeling will be all but forgotten.
#454
Guest_locallegend
Posted 19 June 2009 - 08:17 AM
I see what you mean. If only we could find solid statistics that proves the influence of the allure of being illegal in drug use. If we had that we would most certainly be able to decide on this issue. I may be mistaken in thinking most people are like I am. I have always perused drugs or alcohol in party environments strictly for the intoxication and the worldly pleasure of being high. To dance more, to laugh more, and to have my words flow more freely than if I were sober. The fact that it is illegal has made me take extreme precautions to not get caught, for I do not find jail or police alluring. Most kids do not consider consequences and use drugs or alcohol as a way to act out against parents or authority. Maybe drugs should stay illegal so that the people that want to use responsibly and not get caught, do not get caught. Those who are acting out most always get caught and will reap the consequence of their actions.Ah my friend, it isn't that the only way to get high from marijuana is to do it because it is illegal, but that is some of the allure it has. That same allure could plausibly draw the attention of kids to other more dangerous drugs if marijuana were to be legalized. I'll tell you, there used to be something about drinking that was exhilarating while under age. It fades after a while, and I'm sure after the thrill of being able to drink whenever I want at 21 fades, the distant friend of that exhilarating feeling will be all but forgotten.
#455
Guest_unique616
Posted 20 June 2009 - 04:33 AM
#456
Guest_ganemede
Posted 20 June 2009 - 09:04 AM
#457
Guest_ringses
Posted 20 June 2009 - 09:31 AM
#458
Guest_Mujibar
Posted 20 June 2009 - 10:56 AM
A good point. If Marijuana was legalised then drug dealers would leave or switch to a different drug. Then those who were addicted to harsh drugs would'nt be able to get their fix. This is pretty much the only down side possible for legalising Marijuana.However, this caused a bad side effect. The people who were addicted to harsh drugs couldn't get their fix since there were no drug dealers to buy from, so the government had to step in to prevent the addicts' deaths.
#459
Guest_BlazeShaman
Posted 20 June 2009 - 12:00 PM
#460
Guest_BooKings
Posted 20 June 2009 - 01:42 PM
#461
Guest_erichahn69
Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:21 PM
#462
Guest_G.O.D.
Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:48 PM
This argument is shallow and crude. First off Marijuana is not illegal because it is bad, it is illegal because of a few different reasons. Mostly because of a massive propagandist smear campaign by the owners of textile mills and lumber companies in the united states, a bunch of southerners that hated Mexican Immigrants, and a large group of all around racists.Second, I have been a smoker for a long time (clean now) but I have never gotten "cut" marijuana. I know they cut meth and coke (to make crack) and crack, acid is cut with arsenic and strychnine, but those drugs are the real problems anyway. The closest thing I ever got to "cut" weed was one time my weed smelled like fabric softener to cover the scent for smuggling. And really, unless your going to making brownies, who's going to be eating weed?Third, the idea of marijuana being dangerous has been proven false, so the idea of a derivative of the plant being more dangerous, while less wrong, is still well outside the realm of probability. There is a lethal dosage to THC, but it is so great as to be almost unreachable through realistic methods (example of unrealistic method: Hooking an IV of pure TCH to your veins at full drip). An overdose, though not outside the realm of possibility, is far beyond probable.ok, here are my views.-Marijuana, although it is a "mild-er" drug, still is bad. Hence why it is illegal. -If Marijuana WAS legalized, so would the plant; the Cannabis Plant. The Cannabis plant can also be used to make OTHER more DANGEROUS and POWERFUL drugs. Marijuana is the dried Canabis leaf, and the least potent. However, the sap can make Hashish which is much more potent and worse. So Hashish would also have to be legalised, bringing in a WHOLE OTHER debate on whether or not that is worth being legalised.Drug dealers "cut' the marijuana and other drugs with other similar looking substances to make the actual content less. This can be very bad, because the substances are often not good to eat.
Edited by G.O.D., 20 June 2009 - 07:54 PM.
#463
Posted 20 June 2009 - 08:36 PM
Edited by Tehpengwan, 20 June 2009 - 08:44 PM.
#464
Guest_G.O.D.
Posted 20 June 2009 - 08:52 PM
You are obviously not big on the whole "freedom of choice" thing. Banning tobacco would problably have about the same effect as prohibition did. And honestly if a person is smoking outside one would think that the disbursement of said smoke would reduce the danger lever to an almost non-existent level. I find you comparison to inhaling exhaust fumes to be slightly embellished. If you were locked in a room with smokers and no ventillation then the analogy would work if you put the vehicle in a garage and left it running.Furthermore, the effects of marijuana have been studied in depth, almost as much as the effects of tobacco or alcohol, the only difference is that there wasn't really much to report in the way of negative results. The effect on your brain chemistry can be achieved through many other activities as well (exercise, sex, hyperventillation) all these things affect which neurotransmitters you produce and how much of them. Lethargy is a side effect of marijuana use, but violent behavior and blackouts are a side effect of alcohol abuse, which is worse.I am willing to admit that use in moderation of alcohol can be next to harmless, but take into consideration the reduction of tolerance. The more you drink the more it takes to achieve the desired effect leading to negative side effects anyway. Tolerance levels drop with marijuana too, but unless you know someone that can smoke a three pound joint or a 154 lb person that can eat 46lbs then the risk of overdose is almost non-existent. And the behavior on both drugs is dramatically different. A person that gets drunk can rob a liquor store while the guy on pot eats cheetos and watches brain rotting cartoons.I realize that there are laws against drunk driving, but they are really like handing a retard a loaded gun with the safety off and telling him not to shoot anybody. There is always the chance that the drunk driver does not get caught untill he kills a family of five. Harmless?Firstly, I am not keen about having to walk through a geyser of marijuana smoke whenever I need to enter a public building. Tobacco smokers are insufferable enough, blowing smoke at me that is proven to cause cancer and lung problems. Do not make it so I have to now endure a smoke that has sketchy, under-researched effects on my brain. The claim that less information has been gathered about this drug is just another reason not to haphazardly expose the public to it.Furthermore, alcohol, for instance, can be taken in moderation throughout a person's life without the person suffering any significant damage. As for its abuse, the legal system does at least have laws against DUI, and the authorities are not sympathetic against alcohol abuse related crimes. Small amounts of alcohol taken enter the liver, but if the drug is not abused, the person quickly recovers. Only large, unresponsible amounts will start to destroy the brain (along with the rest of the body). Red wine, as a matter of fact, is often noted as been able to actually extend one's life by promoting a healthy heart. However, marijuana, no matter how small someone claims the effects are, and no matter how little or sparingly it is taken, is a drug that directly effects the brain. People take marijuana for that very reason--for the effects it has on the brain. It doesn't immediately physically disolve the brain as severely as severe alcohol abuse does, but unlike alcohol abuse, taking marijuana, even in moderation, will start to change a person's behavior. They can become lethargic, depressed, and so on.The point is, while alcohol may be a more destructive substance in nature than THC, it is not possible to take marijuana in moderation without experiencing its negative effects, while human bodies are able to at least endure small amounts of alcohol in the body without any permanent damage. While this argument would also beg the question of why we don't ban smoking, I honestly cannot stand smokers either. I would love it if smoking of any kind was banned, but society is apparently leaning in the opposite direction.I suppose you could compare my argument of alcohol vs marijuana as being tied to the hood of a moving car vs working on the car with your face engulfed in exhaust. While it is possible to ride on the hood of a car without sustaining injury at first, if the car goes too fast, you will probably get maimed and suffer horrible injuries, wheras, working on a car with the exhaust on may not have the potential to instantly mangle your body, but it is not possible to remain where you are without inhaling any exhaust, and not matter what, you will suffer harm, even in moderation.In any case, I would certainly be opposed to the legalization of marijuana--especially laws that allow them to smoke in public. I may be less worried if marijuana smokers--and tobacco smokers too for that matter, were required to be in a place where they could only poison themselves, more or less enacting a system of natural selection against these stoners. I find it extremely difficult to understand the decision of someone lucky enough to be born with a healthy brain deciding to risk manually degenerating it.
#465
Posted 21 June 2009 - 09:27 AM
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
#466
Guest_ligthknigth
Posted 22 June 2009 - 04:35 AM
#467
Posted 22 June 2009 - 04:43 AM
I agree that harder drugs are more dangerous, but it's all about who uses the and how often they're used. With a little self-control, not getting addicted to say, coke isn't all that hard. Though I will add that addiction does depend on your personality, but even the most addictive substances can be kicked (such as nicotine, which is even more addictive than heroin.)But really, the really important thing is not marijuana, because the cannabis is used in other things. It should be sinthetic drugs, they're really strong. That ones have to be phorbiden forever.
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
#468
Guest_shistsqueez
Posted 23 June 2009 - 02:36 AM
#469
Guest_uyuyuy
Posted 23 June 2009 - 11:25 AM
#470
Guest_Erreip 199
Posted 23 June 2009 - 03:24 PM
#471
Guest_G.O.D.
Posted 23 June 2009 - 07:35 PM
I will agree to your point that any habit can be kicked, but physically speaking, an addiction to heroin is forever. One can get off of it but the desire always remains. The withdrawal symptoms for nicotine and other things are a walk in a field of flowers compared to the withdrawal symptoms from heroin and alcohol detox, which could result in death. Marijuana is probably one the easiest habits to kick if you have to.I agree that harder drugs are more dangerous, but it's all about who uses the and how often they're used. With a little self-control, not getting addicted to say, coke isn't all that hard. Though I will add that addiction does depend on your personality, but even the most addictive substances can be kicked (such as nicotine, which is even more addictive than heroin.)
#472
Posted 24 June 2009 - 12:49 AM
Serious question; have you ever used heroin?I can tell you first hand that the desire to use doesn't last forever. Sure, you might get a craving once in awhile like with cigarettes, but that's just you remembering what it was like (well, only the good parts). Also, dying from heroin withdrawal is quite rare, but yes it is possible.I will agree to your point that any habit can be kicked, but physically speaking, an addiction to heroin is forever. One can get off of it but the desire always remains. The withdrawal symptoms for nicotine and other things are a walk in a field of flowers compared to the withdrawal symptoms from heroin and alcohol detox, which could result in death. Marijuana is probably one the easiest habits to kick if you have to.
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
#473
Guest_G.O.D.
Posted 25 June 2009 - 01:10 AM
You're right. I have never tried or been addicted to heroin (semi-synthetic opiates yes, heroin no). I guess that in my previous point I was just going off of what I've seen on TV and read in medical books. So to answer your question, I have no background experience to speak of what the detox symptoms for heroin withdrawals are. I stand corrected and apologize sincerely.Serious question; have you ever used heroin?I can tell you first hand that the desire to use doesn't last forever. Sure, you might get a craving once in awhile like with cigarettes, but that's just you remembering what it was like (well, only the good parts). Also, dying from heroin withdrawal is quite rare, but yes it is possible.
#474
Guest_rokklobster
Posted 26 June 2009 - 06:58 AM
#475
Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:28 AM
Oh no problem, but there are a lot of misconceptions when it comes to addiction, especially with heroin.While it is true that getting off of it is much harder than, say, weed, and yes the cravings can come back every so often, an ex-addict can live their lives without even thinking about the stuff again, at least thinking about it in a positive manner.You're right. I have never tried or been addicted to heroin (semi-synthetic opiates yes, heroin no). I guess that in my previous point I was just going off of what I've seen on TV and read in medical books. So to answer your question, I have no background experience to speak of what the detox symptoms for heroin withdrawals are. I stand corrected and apologize sincerely.
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn









