Jump to content


Legalization of Marijuana


  • Please log in to reply
590 replies to this topic

#451 Guest_Phenomenonsense

Guest_Phenomenonsense
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 June 2009 - 11:04 AM

The idea that the high kids are looking to get from weed is caused by knowing it's illegal is the funniest thing I have ever heard. It is nice to know that some of the only arguments against weed are as laughable as this. And even if they institute an age based limit on legalized weed I'll smoke a bowl for the lovely THC, not the thrill of an MIP.

Ah my friend, it isn't that the only way to get high from marijuana is to do it because it is illegal, but that is some of the allure it has. That same allure could plausibly draw the attention of kids to other more dangerous drugs if marijuana were to be legalized. I'll tell you, there used to be something about drinking that was exhilarating while under age. It fades after a while, and I'm sure after the thrill of being able to drink whenever I want at 21 fades, the distant friend of that exhilarating feeling will be all but forgotten.
  • 0

#452 Guest_timbooh

Guest_timbooh
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 18 June 2009 - 04:23 PM

wow wow wow wow wow wow o yes!wow wow wow wow wow wow o yes! i think it's a good idea tot legalise, in that case, young adults can have a really nice lifeGPs were deducted for this post, please read the rules! - KM™
  • 0

#453 Guest_G.O.D.

Guest_G.O.D.
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 June 2009 - 02:24 AM

Ah my friend, it isn't that the only way to get high from marijuana is to do it because it is illegal, but that is some of the allure it has. That same allure could plausibly draw the attention of kids to other more dangerous drugs if marijuana were to be legalized. I'll tell you, there used to be something about drinking that was exhilarating while under age. It fades after a while, and I'm sure after the thrill of being able to drink whenever I want at 21 fades, the distant friend of that exhilarating feeling will be all but forgotten.

Sure the thrill may fade, but I know plenty of people that, after a hard day of work, enjoy being able to kick up their feet and have a drink as a way to relax and let go of the worries of the day. Why should the same idea not apply to pot? And if we were to stiffen the penalties enough for other drugs, which are the real danger to society anyway, what's to say that the distribution and use of said drugs (like crack, meth, coke, ex, and the most quickly growing problem, perscription pills) would decline. Kids will always find a way to get intoxicated. I've even heard of kids huffing the fumes from urine and feces (try regulating that), so the idea that they won't is ridiculous. But as kids are naturally more inclined to be immature and.... well.... dangerous, do we want to enforce that or allow them more access to a substance that will inhibit destructive behavior. Where I come from if you are looking for pot, get ready to hunt. But if you want speed, you have only to ask. I think this a backward standard that should be dealt with as quickly as possible. Also, drug testing is a joke. Marijuana stays in your system for an average of 28 days, whereas meth only stays in your system for 72 hours (as far as I understand). This seems to me to be a way of condoning, or allowing one, while discriminating against the other. Don't get me wrong, there are some jobs that I do not want the guy doing them to be high (brain surgeon), but it is never okay for someone to be a raging speed addict. Functional addict or not, they are dangerous. The most dangerous thing you might do on pot is watch spongebob until your eyes bleed or laugh yourself into a heart attack.
  • 0

#454 Guest_locallegend

Guest_locallegend
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 19 June 2009 - 08:17 AM

Ah my friend, it isn't that the only way to get high from marijuana is to do it because it is illegal, but that is some of the allure it has. That same allure could plausibly draw the attention of kids to other more dangerous drugs if marijuana were to be legalized. I'll tell you, there used to be something about drinking that was exhilarating while under age. It fades after a while, and I'm sure after the thrill of being able to drink whenever I want at 21 fades, the distant friend of that exhilarating feeling will be all but forgotten.

I see what you mean. If only we could find solid statistics that proves the influence of the allure of being illegal in drug use. If we had that we would most certainly be able to decide on this issue. I may be mistaken in thinking most people are like I am. I have always perused drugs or alcohol in party environments strictly for the intoxication and the worldly pleasure of being high. To dance more, to laugh more, and to have my words flow more freely than if I were sober. The fact that it is illegal has made me take extreme precautions to not get caught, for I do not find jail or police alluring. Most kids do not consider consequences and use drugs or alcohol as a way to act out against parents or authority. Maybe drugs should stay illegal so that the people that want to use responsibly and not get caught, do not get caught. Those who are acting out most always get caught and will reap the consequence of their actions.
  • 0

#455 Guest_unique616

Guest_unique616
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 04:33 AM

I just wrote a paper on this topic for English class, and I have yet to find any reasons to keep it illegal.1. It's the perfect drug to counter-act the bad effects of chemotherapy.2. Most people have heard it kills brain cells (from the Dr. Heath and Tulane study), but in fact, the two scientists put gas masks over the monkey's faces and pumped the drug into them without adding oxygen, so the brain damage was caused by suffocation.3. It would get rid of drug lords and crime.4. It would save tax payers money but not having to put people in jail who shouldn't be there in the first place and the drug would be taxed also. I'm hoping the governments would use the tax money to help get people off the bad drugs like Heroin.5. The USA, for some reason, is so scared of marijuana that no one is even allowed to grow hemp, which is the type of marijuana that you can't get high off of. "It can be used to create 5,000 textile products and more than 25,000 products with its cellulose, ranging from dynamite to cellophane". Instead of the USA buying hemp products from other countries, they should make stuff with it themselves to give people good jobs.6. The only reason it's illegal in the first place is because of racist people, yellow journalism, stupid Harry J. Anslinger. TV depicted Mexican's and African American's using marijuana as mentally insane and serial killers, and the Anslinger guy was the one responsible for getting the UN to adopt laws against the drug and coming up with scare tactics to keep people in the USA afraid.7. As for the "Marijuana and driving is bad" argument, watch Speed Vision's Marijuana road test video on youtube. It shows a guy driving a car before and after smoking, and he actually drove better after smoking the stuff.My Dad has a friend, Peter, who lives in a country about the size of Texas. They country was about to go bankrupt prosecuting the people who broke the marijuana laws, so they decided to legalize it. Many people who lived there thought things were going to be horrible, but they were actually surprised. All the drug dealers left the country since they couldn't make any money selling their product. Instead, everyone who wanted it was growing it in their yards instead of paying someone else. However, this caused a bad side effect. The people who were addicted to harsh drugs couldn't get their fix since there were no drug dealers to buy from, so the government had to step in to prevent the addicts' deaths.
  • 0

#456 Guest_ganemede

Guest_ganemede
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 09:04 AM

i dont mind if they legalized marijuana, but it must in some place only dedicated to the users, because we can not cure addiction, like in switzerland they have places dedicated for drug users, lol
  • 0

#457 Guest_ringses

Guest_ringses
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 09:31 AM

I think it should most definately be legalized, it works in Amsterdam, they have no real problems caused by it being legal plus it is better for you than cigarettes and then it could be used by ill people who need it (I'm in the UK).
  • 0

#458 Guest_Mujibar

Guest_Mujibar
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 10:56 AM

However, this caused a bad side effect. The people who were addicted to harsh drugs couldn't get their fix since there were no drug dealers to buy from, so the government had to step in to prevent the addicts' deaths.

A good point. If Marijuana was legalised then drug dealers would leave or switch to a different drug. Then those who were addicted to harsh drugs would'nt be able to get their fix. This is pretty much the only down side possible for legalising Marijuana.
  • 0

#459 Guest_BlazeShaman

Guest_BlazeShaman
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 12:00 PM

ok, here are my views.A few background facts about Marijuana:-Marijuana can make you mad because it affects the mind. Prolonged use has been linked to mental problems.-Marijuana, although it is a "mild-er" drug, still is bad. Hence why it is illegal. -If Marijuana WAS legalized, so would the plant; the Cannabis Plant. The Cannabis plant can also be used to make OTHER more DANGEROUS and POWERFUL drugs. Marijuana is the dried Canabis leaf, and the least potent. However, the sap can make Hashish which is much more potent and worse. So Hashish would also have to be legalised, bringing in a WHOLE OTHER debate on whether or not that is worth being legalised.HOWEVER:-Legalising Marijuana will allow the government to CONTROL the quality of the marijuana and ENSURE there are no bad chemicals or substances in it (besides the Marijuana it self)Drug dealers "cut' the marijuana and other drugs with other similar looking substances to make the actual content less. This can be very bad, because the substances are often not good to eat.-The government will be able to regulate the flow of the drugs, providing better support.-The packets will be able to have "Warnings" on them, much like Australian Cigarette Packets. As well as support lines etc.
  • 0

#460 Guest_BooKings

Guest_BooKings
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 01:42 PM

As I say with all debates that involve mind altering chemicals or substances, it should be up to the person using it as long as the substance in question can't be easily used to harm others (as in poisonous, legal poisons might not be a good idea XD, although you can probably find plenty at your local pharmacist...). If you dig getting your brain fried to bits by substance abuse well go ahead, it's your life and as long as you ain't hurtin' nobody there shouldn't be any problem. If you tell me that alchohol leads to drunk driving I'll simply respond that people will do so whether it's against the law or not, the same thing applies to any other substance use. There won't be 'less' deaths because suddenly this or that substance is illegal, there probably will be more damage done through riots and the life shortening stress it involves.Just a for your information, the reason why there are no deaths made by pot is simply because the government won't admit to having deaths by a substance that is supposed to be illegal and thus inexistant in your country. I do believe that once it becomes legal there will be a plenty of deaths done by lowered reflexes from being high.
  • 0

#461 Guest_erichahn69

Guest_erichahn69
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:21 PM

I believe we should fo citizens over 18 as the primary side effect of THC is inability to retain information.
  • 0

#462 Guest_G.O.D.

Guest_G.O.D.
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:48 PM

ok, here are my views.-Marijuana, although it is a "mild-er" drug, still is bad. Hence why it is illegal. -If Marijuana WAS legalized, so would the plant; the Cannabis Plant. The Cannabis plant can also be used to make OTHER more DANGEROUS and POWERFUL drugs. Marijuana is the dried Canabis leaf, and the least potent. However, the sap can make Hashish which is much more potent and worse. So Hashish would also have to be legalised, bringing in a WHOLE OTHER debate on whether or not that is worth being legalised.Drug dealers "cut' the marijuana and other drugs with other similar looking substances to make the actual content less. This can be very bad, because the substances are often not good to eat.

This argument is shallow and crude. First off Marijuana is not illegal because it is bad, it is illegal because of a few different reasons. Mostly because of a massive propagandist smear campaign by the owners of textile mills and lumber companies in the united states, a bunch of southerners that hated Mexican Immigrants, and a large group of all around racists.Second, I have been a smoker for a long time (clean now) but I have never gotten "cut" marijuana. I know they cut meth and coke (to make crack) and crack, acid is cut with arsenic and strychnine, but those drugs are the real problems anyway. The closest thing I ever got to "cut" weed was one time my weed smelled like fabric softener to cover the scent for smuggling. And really, unless your going to making brownies, who's going to be eating weed?Third, the idea of marijuana being dangerous has been proven false, so the idea of a derivative of the plant being more dangerous, while less wrong, is still well outside the realm of probability. There is a lethal dosage to THC, but it is so great as to be almost unreachable through realistic methods (example of unrealistic method: Hooking an IV of pure TCH to your veins at full drip). An overdose, though not outside the realm of possibility, is far beyond probable.

Edited by G.O.D., 20 June 2009 - 07:54 PM.

  • 0

#463 Tehpengwan

Tehpengwan

    Hatchling

  • Active Member
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
Offline
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 20 June 2009 - 08:36 PM

Firstly, I am not keen about having to walk through a geyser of marijuana smoke whenever I need to enter a public building. Tobacco smokers are insufferable enough, blowing smoke at me that is proven to cause cancer and lung problems. Do not make it so I have to now endure a smoke that has sketchy, under-researched effects on my brain. The claim that less information has been gathered about this drug is just another reason not to haphazardly expose the public to it.Furthermore, alcohol, for instance, can be taken in moderation throughout a person's life without the person suffering any significant damage. As for its abuse, the legal system does at least have laws against DUI, and the authorities are not sympathetic against alcohol abuse related crimes. Small amounts of alcohol taken enter the liver, but if the drug is not abused, the person quickly recovers. Only large, unresponsible amounts will start to destroy the brain (along with the rest of the body). Red wine, as a matter of fact, is often noted as been able to actually extend one's life by promoting a healthy heart. However, marijuana, no matter how small someone claims the effects are, and no matter how little or sparingly it is taken, is a drug that directly effects the brain. People take marijuana for that very reason--for the effects it has on the brain. People always take marijuana to get high, but do not always drink alcohol to get drunk. Marijuana does not immediately physically disolve the brain as severely as severe alcohol abuse does, but unlike alcohol abuse, taking marijuana, even in moderation, will start to change a person's behavior. They can become lethargic, depressed, and so on.The point is, while alcohol may be a more destructive substance in nature than THC, it is not possible to take marijuana in moderation without experiencing its negative effects, while human bodies are able to at least endure small amounts of alcohol in the body without any permanent damage. While this argument would also beg the question of why we don't ban smoking, I honestly cannot stand smokers either. I would love it if smoking of any kind was banned, but society is apparently leaning in the opposite direction.I suppose you could compare my argument of alcohol vs marijuana as being tied to the hood of a moving car vs working on the car with your face engulfed in exhaust. While it is possible to ride on the hood of a car without sustaining injury at first, if the car goes too fast, you will probably get maimed and suffer horrible injuries, wheras, working on a car with the exhaust on may not have the potential to instantly mangle your body, but it is not possible to remain where you are without inhaling any exhaust, and not matter what, you will suffer harm, even in moderation.In any case, I would certainly be opposed to the legalization of marijuana--especially laws that allow them to smoke in public. I may be less worried if marijuana smokers--and tobacco smokers too for that matter, were required to be in a place where they could only poison themselves, more or less enacting a system of natural selection against these stoners. I find it extremely difficult to understand the decision of someone lucky enough to be born with a healthy brain deciding to risk manually degenerating it.

Edited by Tehpengwan, 20 June 2009 - 08:44 PM.

  • 0
I perfected this technique while under a rock.

#464 Guest_G.O.D.

Guest_G.O.D.
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 20 June 2009 - 08:52 PM

Firstly, I am not keen about having to walk through a geyser of marijuana smoke whenever I need to enter a public building. Tobacco smokers are insufferable enough, blowing smoke at me that is proven to cause cancer and lung problems. Do not make it so I have to now endure a smoke that has sketchy, under-researched effects on my brain. The claim that less information has been gathered about this drug is just another reason not to haphazardly expose the public to it.Furthermore, alcohol, for instance, can be taken in moderation throughout a person's life without the person suffering any significant damage. As for its abuse, the legal system does at least have laws against DUI, and the authorities are not sympathetic against alcohol abuse related crimes. Small amounts of alcohol taken enter the liver, but if the drug is not abused, the person quickly recovers. Only large, unresponsible amounts will start to destroy the brain (along with the rest of the body). Red wine, as a matter of fact, is often noted as been able to actually extend one's life by promoting a healthy heart. However, marijuana, no matter how small someone claims the effects are, and no matter how little or sparingly it is taken, is a drug that directly effects the brain. People take marijuana for that very reason--for the effects it has on the brain. It doesn't immediately physically disolve the brain as severely as severe alcohol abuse does, but unlike alcohol abuse, taking marijuana, even in moderation, will start to change a person's behavior. They can become lethargic, depressed, and so on.The point is, while alcohol may be a more destructive substance in nature than THC, it is not possible to take marijuana in moderation without experiencing its negative effects, while human bodies are able to at least endure small amounts of alcohol in the body without any permanent damage. While this argument would also beg the question of why we don't ban smoking, I honestly cannot stand smokers either. I would love it if smoking of any kind was banned, but society is apparently leaning in the opposite direction.I suppose you could compare my argument of alcohol vs marijuana as being tied to the hood of a moving car vs working on the car with your face engulfed in exhaust. While it is possible to ride on the hood of a car without sustaining injury at first, if the car goes too fast, you will probably get maimed and suffer horrible injuries, wheras, working on a car with the exhaust on may not have the potential to instantly mangle your body, but it is not possible to remain where you are without inhaling any exhaust, and not matter what, you will suffer harm, even in moderation.In any case, I would certainly be opposed to the legalization of marijuana--especially laws that allow them to smoke in public. I may be less worried if marijuana smokers--and tobacco smokers too for that matter, were required to be in a place where they could only poison themselves, more or less enacting a system of natural selection against these stoners. I find it extremely difficult to understand the decision of someone lucky enough to be born with a healthy brain deciding to risk manually degenerating it.

You are obviously not big on the whole "freedom of choice" thing. Banning tobacco would problably have about the same effect as prohibition did. And honestly if a person is smoking outside one would think that the disbursement of said smoke would reduce the danger lever to an almost non-existent level. I find you comparison to inhaling exhaust fumes to be slightly embellished. If you were locked in a room with smokers and no ventillation then the analogy would work if you put the vehicle in a garage and left it running.Furthermore, the effects of marijuana have been studied in depth, almost as much as the effects of tobacco or alcohol, the only difference is that there wasn't really much to report in the way of negative results. The effect on your brain chemistry can be achieved through many other activities as well (exercise, sex, hyperventillation) all these things affect which neurotransmitters you produce and how much of them. Lethargy is a side effect of marijuana use, but violent behavior and blackouts are a side effect of alcohol abuse, which is worse.I am willing to admit that use in moderation of alcohol can be next to harmless, but take into consideration the reduction of tolerance. The more you drink the more it takes to achieve the desired effect leading to negative side effects anyway. Tolerance levels drop with marijuana too, but unless you know someone that can smoke a three pound joint or a 154 lb person that can eat 46lbs then the risk of overdose is almost non-existent. And the behavior on both drugs is dramatically different. A person that gets drunk can rob a liquor store while the guy on pot eats cheetos and watches brain rotting cartoons.I realize that there are laws against drunk driving, but they are really like handing a retard a loaded gun with the safety off and telling him not to shoot anybody. There is always the chance that the drunk driver does not get caught untill he kills a family of five. Harmless?
  • 0

#465 Ragamuffin

Ragamuffin

    Old Man Internet

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 637 posts
Offline
Current mood: Chatty
Reputation: 232
Perfected

Posted 21 June 2009 - 09:27 AM

Merged new weed thread with old one.l2search, people
  • 0

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


#466 Guest_ligthknigth

Guest_ligthknigth
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 22 June 2009 - 04:35 AM

This hard to awnser, so I'll only give my opinion.As smoker of marijuana in Mexico, I'll be happy. It just to expensive paying the money for cops to give a damn of smoking that.But really, the really important thing is not marijuana, because the cannabis is used in other things. It should be sinthetic drugs, they're really strong. That ones have to be phorbiden forever.
  • 0

#467 Ragamuffin

Ragamuffin

    Old Man Internet

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 637 posts
Offline
Current mood: Chatty
Reputation: 232
Perfected

Posted 22 June 2009 - 04:43 AM

But really, the really important thing is not marijuana, because the cannabis is used in other things. It should be sinthetic drugs, they're really strong. That ones have to be phorbiden forever.

I agree that harder drugs are more dangerous, but it's all about who uses the and how often they're used. With a little self-control, not getting addicted to say, coke isn't all that hard. Though I will add that addiction does depend on your personality, but even the most addictive substances can be kicked (such as nicotine, which is even more addictive than heroin.)
  • 0

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


#468 Guest_shistsqueez

Guest_shistsqueez
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 June 2009 - 02:36 AM

i belive that that it should be legalized and governmentaly distributed. i know that in my experiences some of the other "worse drugs" came with the sketchy people that were getting pot, and i think that if you just get people away from that then hard drug use would drop and maby it would screw over crazy cartels because they dont import weed any more, and give people jobs like harvesting crops. Also the government wouldnt have to put as much investigations on marijuana (to an extent) and focus on the harder drugs, or just save some money. I love it, but some people take it in a different way than i do too... :doom:
  • 0

#469 Guest_uyuyuy

Guest_uyuyuy
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 June 2009 - 11:25 AM

Ok in all honesty shists does make a good point. If they legalized marijuana not only would they be saving government money that could be used for something a little more productive than overpaying law enforcement to bust or frame people with drugs to get a point across, it would provide more jobs, and we know the world needs more of them.Marijuana is good for a lot of medical things such as Glacouma. Come to think about it if anyone has actually smoked it while they were in pain doesn't it ease the pain and make it easier to sleep? If you go to the doctor they'll prescribe you some harsh drug like Vikaden (sp) or Loratabs, and not only can that medicine cause nasuea, it can kill you. I mean have you ever heard of anyone overdosing on pot? I haven't and frankly I think thats about impossible. So what it boils down to is legalizing pot would not only relieve some tension on the governments budget, it would potentially lower the death rate over a period of time.
  • 0

#470 Guest_Erreip 199

Guest_Erreip 199
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 June 2009 - 03:24 PM

it Should be legalized, it will pretty much ruin the illegal market due to lower prizes from legit stores and its people problems if they want to get doped, afterwards they will release stop getting high programs exactly like smoking today and their stop smoking campaigns
  • 0

#471 Guest_G.O.D.

Guest_G.O.D.
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 23 June 2009 - 07:35 PM

I agree that harder drugs are more dangerous, but it's all about who uses the and how often they're used. With a little self-control, not getting addicted to say, coke isn't all that hard. Though I will add that addiction does depend on your personality, but even the most addictive substances can be kicked (such as nicotine, which is even more addictive than heroin.)

I will agree to your point that any habit can be kicked, but physically speaking, an addiction to heroin is forever. One can get off of it but the desire always remains. The withdrawal symptoms for nicotine and other things are a walk in a field of flowers compared to the withdrawal symptoms from heroin and alcohol detox, which could result in death. Marijuana is probably one the easiest habits to kick if you have to.
  • 0

#472 Ragamuffin

Ragamuffin

    Old Man Internet

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 637 posts
Offline
Current mood: Chatty
Reputation: 232
Perfected

Posted 24 June 2009 - 12:49 AM

I will agree to your point that any habit can be kicked, but physically speaking, an addiction to heroin is forever. One can get off of it but the desire always remains. The withdrawal symptoms for nicotine and other things are a walk in a field of flowers compared to the withdrawal symptoms from heroin and alcohol detox, which could result in death. Marijuana is probably one the easiest habits to kick if you have to.

Serious question; have you ever used heroin?I can tell you first hand that the desire to use doesn't last forever. Sure, you might get a craving once in awhile like with cigarettes, but that's just you remembering what it was like (well, only the good parts). Also, dying from heroin withdrawal is quite rare, but yes it is possible.
  • 0

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


#473 Guest_G.O.D.

Guest_G.O.D.
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 25 June 2009 - 01:10 AM

Serious question; have you ever used heroin?I can tell you first hand that the desire to use doesn't last forever. Sure, you might get a craving once in awhile like with cigarettes, but that's just you remembering what it was like (well, only the good parts). Also, dying from heroin withdrawal is quite rare, but yes it is possible.

You're right. I have never tried or been addicted to heroin (semi-synthetic opiates yes, heroin no). I guess that in my previous point I was just going off of what I've seen on TV and read in medical books. So to answer your question, I have no background experience to speak of what the detox symptoms for heroin withdrawals are. I stand corrected and apologize sincerely.
  • 0

#474 Guest_rokklobster

Guest_rokklobster
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 26 June 2009 - 06:58 AM

I remember a snippet i heard from the book Freakonomics in which they related the drug trade to a McDonalds. If marijuana is legalized as many have said we could tax the brains out of it helping alleiviate the problems of our out of control national debt.also it would reduce the crime rate as gangs who dealt in the drug trade would no longer be an illegitimate franchise.It is overall a great ideato me
  • 0

#475 Ragamuffin

Ragamuffin

    Old Man Internet

  • Dragon's Sentinel
  • 637 posts
Offline
Current mood: Chatty
Reputation: 232
Perfected

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:28 AM

You're right. I have never tried or been addicted to heroin (semi-synthetic opiates yes, heroin no). I guess that in my previous point I was just going off of what I've seen on TV and read in medical books. So to answer your question, I have no background experience to speak of what the detox symptoms for heroin withdrawals are. I stand corrected and apologize sincerely.

Oh no problem, but there are a lot of misconceptions when it comes to addiction, especially with heroin.While it is true that getting off of it is much harder than, say, weed, and yes the cravings can come back every so often, an ex-addict can live their lives without even thinking about the stuff again, at least thinking about it in a positive manner.
  • 0

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn