trying to play the full game on both screens would be a pain though.For two player games, however, it would be silly. For Battleship you'd be able to see each others screens Sticking with two DS's for multiplayer games is best 
should they make a ds where both screens are touch?
Started by
Guest_kirky_lions
, Dec 22 2009 12:50 AM
50 replies to this topic
#26
Guest_KuroibaraKitty
Guest_KuroibaraKitty
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2011 - 06:16 AM
Yeah, I think that two touch screens would make it harder. Although, if it's something like the game screen on the bottom and an interactive map on the top, I don't think that would be bad trying to play the full game on both screens would be a pain though.For two player games, however, it would be silly. For Battleship you'd be able to see each others screens Sticking with two DS's for multiplayer games is best
trying to play the full game on both screens would be a pain though.For two player games, however, it would be silly. For Battleship you'd be able to see each others screens Sticking with two DS's for multiplayer games is best
#27
Guest_Jeffvillones
Guest_Jeffvillones
-
- Guest
Posted 13 March 2011 - 07:39 AM
YES two screens would be nice, though I'm not sure how it would be possible to play without hitting the top screen back during intense gaming lol.
#28
wolfdemonrobbie_02
-
- Active Member
-
- 107 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 13 March 2011 - 08:12 PM
That would be too complicated. Because then your attention is divided into trying to touch one thing, but accidentally go for another. Also for those who space out easily (like me) or others who have short attention spans, that would prove to be too frustrating to try to follow along.
[Insert signature here]
#29
Guest_tec2030
Guest_tec2030
-
- Guest
Posted 14 March 2011 - 06:11 AM
Truthfully, I hate the one touch screen the DS has..I kind of wish they never would have done it.
#30
Guest_hirokazuma
Guest_hirokazuma
-
- Guest
Posted 15 March 2011 - 05:40 PM
Honestly, handheld games will come to an end. It's only a matter of time before Apple does something no one can top.
#31
Guest_AlinaGirl
Guest_AlinaGirl
-
- Guest
Posted 16 March 2011 - 09:40 AM
ZOMG!!! Would be pretty funky to have both touchscreen.Wonder if they would consider it.
#32
Guest_adizol
Guest_adizol
-
- Guest
Posted 16 March 2011 - 01:48 PM
the upper screen should have some reenforcement modifications if this happens
#33
Guest_Staarf
Guest_Staarf
-
- Guest
Posted 16 March 2011 - 02:01 PM
Yeah, it would probably be a lot easier to scratch up the top screen (considering I'd probably forget that it's touch-sensitive, being so used to the one touchscreen model) and I really don't have the money to muck something up like that. Plus, the screens are too tiny to do anything really cool, like multiplayer games. I mean, how would you hold it like that?
#34
Guest_SparkAngel
Guest_SparkAngel
-
- Guest
Posted 16 March 2011 - 05:22 PM
No. That would be very annoying, extremely annoying and who knows the limitless amounts of mistake people could make because the double touch screen is too complicated for them. It would cost a lot of money as well, I think it's better to just stick to the original.
#35
Guest_tysonpokemonfan
Guest_tysonpokemonfan
-
- Guest
Posted 22 March 2011 - 03:17 PM
No, I don't think this should happen. It would make the games more complicated, and we might accidentally touch the wrong screen, which may create some undesirable effects in the game.
#36
SkyNymph
-
- Active Member
-
- 276 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 26 March 2011 - 02:48 AM
It would make games a lot more complicated. To be honest, it would probably drive me crazy because I am a little bit OCD. I absolutely hate finger prints on anything and am constantly cleaning all of my electronics.
#37
Guest_rdp1408
Guest_rdp1408
-
- Guest
Posted 28 March 2011 - 01:28 AM
Nah. I think thats a bit much. You don't really need two touch screens. Then you'd have to go back and forth between the two of them. It would be too much
#38
Guest_jalagamv2
Guest_jalagamv2
-
- Guest
Posted 28 March 2011 - 05:15 PM
I feel it is better to keep one screen for touch and the other for viewing.It won't be that nice with dual touch screens.
#39
Guest_darkmillenia
Guest_darkmillenia
-
- Guest
Posted 27 June 2011 - 11:47 AM
Don't really think that would be a good idea. Wouldn't it make the lid extra bulky?
#40
Guest_branistheman
Guest_branistheman
-
- Guest
Posted 13 September 2011 - 01:17 AM
hmmm i can see it now they will call it the ndsdt but yes i would love for them to make one with 2 touch screens or even better both touch screen and both 3d now that would be something
but yes i would love for them to make one with 2 touch screens or even better both touch screen and both 3d now that would be something
#41
CopyCat
-
- Member
-
- 22 posts
Egg
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 13 September 2011 - 04:20 AM
For the beginning i and my friends was trying to "touch" upper screen but then i used to "touch" jast lower screen...and don`t see what can do with both touch screensSo NDS good what they are
#42
Guest_olivegreencrayon
Guest_olivegreencrayon
-
- Guest
Posted 08 January 2012 - 09:35 PM
I see no point at all to have both touch, unless you can do a two player thing. But even then, it's just troublesome.
#43
Guest_Forum Freak
Guest_Forum Freak
-
- Guest
Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:47 AM
The pixels on a touch screen are too poor, gaming would suck with 2 ds-3ds touch screens. To be honest while gaming i rarely ever use the touchscreen and play using buttons only. Apart from now, as i type from my 3ds! 
Edited by Forum Freak, 11 January 2012 - 06:50 AM.
#44
Guest_keroro
Guest_keroro
-
- Guest
Posted 12 January 2012 - 05:06 AM
I think, if we can touch both screens, we can more various usage. But then we say this,"Why 2 displays?" maybe.
#45
slegiar
-
- Active Member
-
- 212 posts
Serpent
Reputation: 3
Neutral
Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:03 PM
i could certainly see some interesting uses for a duel touch screen layout. better map and inventory management with it being on the fly instead of pausing the game perhaps? but sadly i don't see companies being that innovative, so the chances of the idea actually working are probably pretty slim XP
#46
izzyyamada
-
- Active Member
-
- 44 posts
Egg
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 24 June 2012 - 02:42 AM
That would make things way too complicated. I'm having hard enough time focusing on both screens already.
#47
Guest_Epicle
Guest_Epicle
-
- Guest
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:16 AM
I'm afraid if Nintendo were to implement this, they would simply go over-board and force the player to neglect all of the physical buttons, which wouldn't be a problem but it would be hard to see whats going on with the game with 5 of your fingers on the screen needed to control it, a great idea in theory but the screens would have to become larger.
#48
ratgirlfancy
-
- Member
-
- 38 posts
Egg
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 04 August 2012 - 04:36 AM
It would be kinda hard to play games like that. More complex and stuff, but it could work
#49
Guest_silverlight23
Guest_silverlight23
-
- Guest
Posted 08 August 2012 - 11:29 AM
Both screens being touchscreens does seem to have some potential, but it seems rather complicated and somewhat redundant as well. I probably wouldn't go for it unless I was shown an example where it was put to very good use.
#50
Guest_jbs3
Guest_jbs3
-
- Guest
Posted 09 August 2012 - 04:22 PM
no, it would be too complicated to play
Edited by jbs3, 09 August 2012 - 04:22 PM.
