The Human Body, 'art', nature or 'porn'?
Started by
Guest_Forum Freak
, Nov 13 2011 02:13 AM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Guest_Forum Freak
Posted 13 November 2011 - 02:13 AM
While discussing the body, the question about it was raised about how we, humans, see the human body.On tv during the day, we cannot show the naked body. if we go out without clothes on, we even get arrested for it!? (
) But why? Are we ashamed to be animals? Or disgusted to be a part of nature? Why should something we all have be seen as "offensive" or "vulgar"? I myself see the human body as a work or art, as is with all things in nature. I dont honeslty understand how people can be upset by it lol.
how about anyone else?
#2
Guest_Nikolaos
Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:44 AM
The naked human body is a natural thing, but so is arsenic.
#3
Posted 15 November 2011 - 11:54 PM
I'm thinking that this would fit within the debates section. Anything can always be considered art including a can of soup. To be straightforward, I'm not an art critic, but when you think about it, the human body has always been considered art before there was porn. Now as to why people want to call the police when they see someone trying to express themselves as art.... not everyone is into art.
Spoiler
Spoiler
I don't have any underage porn or hentai on my profile.
#4
Posted 20 November 2011 - 06:09 AM
Ehh, it really depends on how the human body is portrayed, but because it's such a controversial topic, people steer clear from it, like they do with religion.
#5
Guest_pitbullking817
Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:43 PM
siah is right, it all depends on context. the body is art with its a beautiful, fit man or woman. its nature when the person is less attractive and is offensive when its a fat ass dude running around with his wang out in the open, seeing his jelly shake with every step.
#6
Guest_chisan
Posted 26 November 2011 - 12:26 AM
women + in naked vids = PORN 4 me
#7
Guest_dragoniteking
Posted 27 November 2011 - 11:42 PM
nature for some n porn for me













