SOTW Discussion
#377
Posted 25 December 2007 - 06:20 PM
#378
Posted 25 December 2007 - 11:38 PM

does it trouble your mind, the way you trouble mine?
#379
Posted 26 December 2007 - 02:23 AM
#381
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:25 AM
awesome.
#382
Posted 03 January 2008 - 01:27 PM
#383
Guest_UMSL
Posted 09 January 2008 - 05:31 PM
#384
Guest_DJMaffia
Posted 10 January 2008 - 09:04 PM
Most of the people here use photoshop , if i'm not mistaken :)and i don't think that someone would make a sig pixel by pixel lolWhat types of programs are you guys using? How are you able to "draw" these sort of pictures? Is it pixel by pixel (I doubt it, but there may be some hardcore guys out there ) or what? Also, what do you mean by render?UMSL
#385
Posted 11 January 2008 - 01:29 AM
凍 結 す る 天 の 氷 フ ェ ニ ッ ク ス
櫻井雷俐鳳
I support gba3000 in all her deliciousness.
#386
Guest_UMSL
Posted 14 January 2008 - 08:25 PM
Edited by UMSL, 14 January 2008 - 08:32 PM.
#387
Posted 10 February 2008 - 08:01 AM
You really know how to BS your way into making it seem better than it is, huh?
This is an abstract piece that I feel represents the emotional turmoil one experiences when forced to deal with the constantly shifting paradigms that modern urban life invariably brings about. The somewhat faded colours give the image a deceptively soft and amalgamated feel, which when contrasted with the asymmetry brought about by the straight, even lines gives the beholder an impartial view of the chaos and cultural clash that are so rampant all across today's world. Moreover, the increasing complexity and intricacy of the lines toward the center of the piece, as emphasised by the dichromatic 'frame' that invites the eye to delve further into the illustrious depths of the apparent chaos depicted by the image -- further accented by the gradual increase in intensity of the colours, culminating in a shade of red that is not quite unlike that of dried and congealed blood, which causes the beholder to contemplate further about what it might represent -- firmly brings the viewer along by the hand and forces him or her to consider more thoroughly the inherent disharmony of our environment.I hope you appreciate what I have created here.It's not often that ones such as you are graced with such artistic perfection.
#388
Posted 10 February 2008 - 02:14 PM
#389
Guest_unkown999
Posted 10 February 2008 - 02:14 PM
#390
Guest_.Aden
Posted 14 February 2008 - 07:15 PM
#391
Guest_Kvothe
Posted 14 February 2008 - 11:10 PM
Fact. Pure fact. It's your artistic sense that's BS.You really know how to BS your way into making it seem better than it is, huh?
#392
Guest___chenza
Posted 15 February 2008 - 03:37 PM
#393
Guest_Kvothe
Posted 19 February 2008 - 05:44 PM
#395
Guest_Maelstrom_Divide
Posted 19 February 2008 - 06:30 PM
Edited by Maelstrom_Divide, 19 February 2008 - 06:32 PM.
#396
Guest_Kvothe
Posted 19 February 2008 - 10:28 PM
That's a brilliant idea for a theme, by the way. You should suggest it.potpourri
#399
Guest_Kvothe
Posted 23 February 2008 - 10:54 AM
VG, I swear, you are a pretentious fucking idiot. First of all, we have exclusive VA mods for a reason. They were chosen because they now how to handle VA. We have an exclusive SOTW mod. I assure you these people have a better idea how to handle this than you do. If you absolutely must edit, add a freaking line at the bottom and deduct points or something if you want, don't remove the post entirely. If you must remove the post, don't act like a jackass while doing it. The people that do the actual judging are fully capable of excluding the guy. It's not like he was about to win anyway, so there was no point at all, just let him be.I don't know how much the no editing thing is in effect anyway. It's entirely possible and not very hard to change your sig without editing your post, so no one cares much about this rule. It's always been kinda dubious, and frankly I still don't really see why it's in place.Read the rules.* you can NOT edit your postYou edited it. Removed.
#400
Posted 23 February 2008 - 01:59 PM


This topic is locked









