Edited by K.O King, 17 December 2007 - 11:16 AM.
Sex in games
#251
Guest_K.O King
Posted 17 December 2007 - 11:15 AM
#252
Guest_zathrun
Posted 17 December 2007 - 11:17 AM
#253
Guest_chrisjohn
Posted 17 December 2007 - 11:31 AM
#254
Guest_mysteryfighterx
Posted 17 December 2007 - 12:15 PM
#255
Posted 17 December 2007 - 10:06 PM
Does it?I think the USA(yes, I'm generalising, but try to prove me wrong) exaggerates about sex. I haven't seen Kana, but from what I've read on wiki, it's a graphic novel in which sex, incest and such is a main plot point! Sure, you don't have to be excessively graphic(but that's just the way the Japanese writers like to do it in their manga/whatever), but I don't see the problem. It's a main plot point, and it isn't pornographic or such. It's simply a visual presentation of the most pure form of love that exists. How can that be wrong?See, Kana: Little Sister is one example.It's got one INCREDIBLE storyline, but someone had to look at it and say, "oh surely it needs more secks to attract moer cumstomers" and turn it into a eroge game. It's just bloody stupid; a good visual novel got ruined because some retard bought into the rumor that sex sells.I mean, come on, sex and proper games don't mix. If you fade it out as the characters start kissing or something, fine, but putting full blown crap in just because just ruins the whole thing for us non-14-year-old-hormone-crazy-male-kids.
My point exactly... not at all. No porn, I agree. That's made for the horny 14-year-olds without a girlfriend. However, sex is - as I said - pure love. Love is good.Violence, on the contrary, is way more accepted, while it is destructive and unnatural. The sex/violence debate is the most present, and to me, most shining example of paradoxes in modern culture.no, no and no! no sex and no porn! (what is hentai?)
it took hours and hours but.
by the time i was done with it.
i was so involved. i didn't even know what to think.
i carried it around with me for days. and days.
playing little games.
like. not looking at it for a whole day.
and then. looking at it.
to see if I still liked it.
i did.
#256
Guest_the__unknown000
Posted 18 December 2007 - 04:40 AM
#257
Guest_Gondolhero
Posted 23 December 2007 - 07:40 AM
#258
Guest_rotex
Posted 23 December 2007 - 07:43 AM
#259
Guest_aznboidavid
Posted 23 December 2007 - 05:23 PM
#260
Guest_Darkgust
Posted 24 December 2007 - 09:17 PM
I know that that will be sex somewhere in there, fine. But the instant they put in all the graphical scenes, they changed the targeted demographic from "deep thinking novel readers" to "14 year old fap boys". The whole plot is wasted as thus, since people who loves reading will take one look at the shelf the game is on and turn away, and the lonely little lardarses don't care a damn for the story.The point is, love is not about sex. You can convey the idea of love with plenty of ways; using sex just means you're bloody lazy (or, y'know, into that kind of stuff). I can bet with my life that you can cut out every single hentai scene in Kana: Little Sister and still manage to have someone look at it and know, exactly, just how each character feel (and I intend to prove it in my playthrough).Does it?I think the USA(yes, I'm generalising, but try to prove me wrong) exaggerates about sex. I haven't seen Kana, but from what I've read on wiki, it's a graphic novel in which sex, incest and such is a main plot point! Sure, you don't have to be excessively graphic(but that's just the way the Japanese writers like to do it in their manga/whatever), but I don't see the problem. It's a main plot point, and it isn't pornographic or such. It's simply a visual presentation of the most pure form of love that exists. How can that be wrong?
#261
Guest_dadads
Posted 25 December 2007 - 11:32 AM
#262
Guest_Alchemist Lord
Posted 25 December 2007 - 11:38 AM
#263
Guest_dragonarms
Posted 01 January 2008 - 09:51 PM
#264
Guest_nelson89
Posted 02 January 2008 - 04:32 AM
#265
Guest_DarkSilver007
Posted 02 January 2008 - 08:14 AM
#266
Guest_samboss123
Posted 02 January 2008 - 12:47 PM
lol.... for sure....i would be glad to see some more....some hardcore for big boyzz is what i want....can u pppl pls tell me some sex games in gba's i need a list of em....POINTS were deducted for this post by hookshot-Please refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.Do you think their should be more sex in games
#267
Guest_wullets
Posted 02 January 2008 - 01:18 PM
#268
Guest_Balore
Posted 02 January 2008 - 01:27 PM
They can be "in the same sinc" if done properly, it's just that they're usually not. Don't let vast majority's lack of plot make you think they can't have an interesting story behind them.like dude thats kinda sick like porn mixed with games is wrong just because there not in the same sinc
#269
Guest_cloud137
Posted 02 January 2008 - 03:01 PM
#270
Guest_Arcrode
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:41 AM
I'm sure you can find that somewhere, Rule 34 and all.I don't see much of a problem with adding some, but not in all or most games (if only to shut the politicians up). Although I haven't "played" kana, I have played Tsukihime, so I'll be using that. The sex isn't really important in that one (I mean when you install it they even ask if you want to leave it out), but I suppose it's there to make it more interesting. The sex scenes are just pictures, and it gets a mosaic on certain parts too. Sex probably did help put Tsukihime on the map. Don't get me wrong, the storyline is great, but getting the good and true endings for everyone takes a while. They probably wanted something that would make more people buy it who couldn't normally go through the whole story. For the text based games, you have to look at it as two different types of games. One that has storyline and is probably something like a visual novel (like Tsukihime and apparently Kana) and ones that are sold just for the sex (I think they're called bishoujou games). As good as the former are, they'll always do better if they have some sex in them. If it's pure text, a lot of people would get bored of it easily, or wouldn't pick it up in the first place. For the latter, that's the whole point so there's no point in arguing whether it should be there or not,In games that you actually control the character and do stuff, I don't really care if they put it in there as long as it's not the major point of the game (whether it be a scene or you're controlling it). I didn't think the hot coffee mod for GTA was that big a deal (although I never played it). Maybe it's because for me, the GTA series was never awesome anyway. There seems to be a problem when people enjoy stealing cars and beating up hookers, but find it offensive to see sex. Those kind of things are M rated for a reason. If a company wants to put sex in it, I don't think it's a big deal because it'll be rated M or AO. Besides, games that sell only on sex don't really do well. I'm thinking of the guy game and *I think* Larry *something.*like dude thats kinda sick like porn mixed with games is wrong just because there not in the same sinc and plus think about would you want to see a great video game like umm halo3 with a sex scene of the master chief doing kortana....thats not right
#271
Guest_blablablamrfreeman
Posted 03 January 2008 - 07:08 PM
#272
Guest_Sky-High
Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:49 PM
#273
Guest_Lionheart120887
Posted 05 January 2008 - 05:26 PM
#274
Guest_Balore
Posted 05 January 2008 - 05:33 PM
Edited by Balore, 05 January 2008 - 05:34 PM.
#275
Guest_Darkgust
Posted 06 January 2008 - 09:11 AM
Your act is noted. :(Although really, you'll definitely alienate a large portion of the general populace if you start putting in graphical scenes. Yes, sex sells, but to which crowd?If you think about it, sex is one of the few things that never (or barely ever) had a good storyline behind it when in video games, and I think it's about time they came up with some interesting ideas.
Edited by Darkgust, 06 January 2008 - 09:12 AM.









