maybe mutation occurredA word on the 150 original pokemon limit. In the first season, Professor Oak professed that there were only 150 pokemon, and that those were all the ones that ever could or would be. In the second season, the limit was raised to 250. Here's my question: How did all of those guys miss 100 POKEMON!?!?!?!? That's a lot of Pokemon to miss. I used to watch the show, and I have nothing against it per se, but come on...100 pokemon? And then more were added? How do they still put faith in anything any of the professors have to say? They missed a lot of pokemon. I would've been pissed if I had caught all 150. "Hey, I got all 150!" "Ooh, sorry, there's actually 250. Yeah, turns out we missed a couple...hundred."
Pokemon V.s Digimon
#1926
Guest_leaderofrouge
Posted 01 March 2007 - 02:14 PM
#1927
Guest_redinferno
Posted 01 March 2007 - 04:07 PM
#1928
Guest_schutje
Posted 01 March 2007 - 04:08 PM
#1929
Posted 01 March 2007 - 04:19 PM
digimon is over and pokemon is much longer plus digimon was kinda shortthen this really isn't convincing at all
PSN: Verbalinter39
~I$h
#1930
Guest_sozi
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:37 PM
#1931
Guest_darkstreak
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:48 PM
#1932
Guest_sozi
Posted 02 March 2007 - 12:52 AM
#1933
Guest_trancebam
Posted 02 March 2007 - 04:11 AM
#1934
Guest_thebigboi
Posted 02 March 2007 - 04:46 AM
#1935
Guest_tvmonkeys
Posted 02 March 2007 - 05:44 AM
#1936
Guest_kao13i2
Posted 02 March 2007 - 07:06 AM
#1937
Guest_leaderofrouge
Posted 02 March 2007 - 03:55 PM
*hands raised* I suggested thatOh yeah! I remember those games. That was a long time ago. But they were way better than the GBA pokemon games. Although Pokemon Colloseum was up to par with them. Oh, and for the person who said Digimon is over? It's not. They're actually starting a fifth season. And they always have a new protagonist in every season. Not like in Pokemon, where Ash is always trying to catch'em all and Gary always has way more than Ash, but somehow Ash always defeats Gary. How is it that Gary is always one step and 100 pokemon ahead of Ash? That's so stupid. Anyway, for the person who suggested mutation in Pokemon? Didn't happen. Whole new parts of the world were somehow "discovered" and the original 150 existed on those parts of the world along with the other new Pokemon. I still don't buy the whole "Oops, we sorta missed a couple 100 pokemon." Whereas in Digimon, the digimon can digivolve into different kinds of digimon, and then they can go back to their original forms for easier travel. How can a pokemon like Charizard fit into that tiny Pokeball? Digimon, in my opinion was much more realistic, considering that the monsters came from a digital world. Think of the third season. It started off as an online game, but somehow there were people (otherwise known as digidestined) who could use their digimon partners outside of the computer world. While that's not realistic, their reactions were. Anyone see the movie? Great animation. The battle between Omnimon and that virus? Everyone around the world was watching it. And what's more is none of them knew that it was an actual battle. They just figured it was a video, or a game. Not everyone knew about Digimon and the fact that they were actually real, and taht's much more realistic than a world inhabited by animals that can say their name, and that's it. And somehow they can understand eachother. You would think that a Charizard could only speak Charizard and a Pikachu could only speak Pikachu, but somehow they understand eachother. And they can comprehend the English language, but they can't speak it. Just not realistic at all.
#1938
Posted 02 March 2007 - 04:47 PM
Edited by Dom15, 02 March 2007 - 04:47 PM.
#1939
Posted 02 March 2007 - 05:51 PM
#1940
Guest_auris2
Posted 02 March 2007 - 06:47 PM
#1941
Guest_rafeal
Posted 02 March 2007 - 06:55 PM
#1942
Guest_James 32
Posted 02 March 2007 - 08:07 PM
#1943
Guest_Caged Nine
Posted 02 March 2007 - 08:16 PM
Pokemon destroys digimon on like every front EXCEPT the tv shows. But digimon games are universally know for being sub-par. Anyway i always thought of it as a cheap rip off and until they bring something that is really intuitive that pokemon hasnt thought of I will continue to think that.Pokemon is better because the idea is better than digimon which kept on getting changed.
#1944
Guest_moomoomax
Posted 02 March 2007 - 08:17 PM
#1945
Guest_Caged Nine
Posted 02 March 2007 - 08:24 PM
Just to let you know its not really darker. Thats just a facade the makers put up to differentiate it from Pokemon.pokemon is more popular, but digimon is slightly darker
#1946
Guest_Wakisazhi
Posted 02 March 2007 - 10:10 PM
#1947
Guest_Searonix
Posted 02 March 2007 - 10:33 PM
#1948
Guest_Caged Nine
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:19 PM
Why would you vote for pokemon?! They have nothing over pokemon and arent very original. Well your entitled to your opinion...even if its wrong...Pokemon came out first, but I still vote Digimon!!
#1949
Guest_something_said86
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:39 PM
#1950
Guest_Iftikhar19
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:16 AM











