Edited by ···, 14 October 2007 - 06:52 PM.
Flaming.
Who the hell would believe in evolution???
Started by
Guest_MichahSimmons
, Jan 09 2006 08:34 PM
1136 replies to this topic
#476
Guest_Bobalot
Guest_Bobalot
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 05:54 AM
All you retards keep saying evolution didn't happen, but yet to offer any actual proof. Only vague bullcrap like:"Theres the missing link that sorta falls out of logical explanation where there isn't a 'middle' species in the middle of the evolution of one species to another. Hmmm..."What the hell is this? Source quoted? Nope. Example in particular identified? Nope. Vague bullcrap? Yes. "Evolution is totally bogus. Period"Great use of the scientific method there, idiot." Evolution did not hapen. Science itself concludes that. look up the DNA code."Except for the fact that the DNA results of thousands of peer reviewed tests and scientific papers indicate otherwise, you are totally correct. (Just for the many dimwitted douchebags around here, that was sarcasm). Also the fact that no major scientific institution has ever said "Evolution did not hapen[sic]", also makes this point look a bit retarded. (The misspelling does no favors either.)The only proof that evolution didn't happen is that morons like you exist.POINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#477
Guest_lxg911
Guest_lxg911
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 05:56 AM
i just rely on the word of God. God created us..
#478
Guest_guest69
Guest_guest69
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 05:59 AM
judging by your statement and topic, i safely assume you have no specific knowledge in the topic and by reading your "facts" i also would like to point out that you have no real facts, you have general statements which in theory could make sense, but they revolve around no specific fact or statistc and are false. evolution all the way
#479
Guest_Firemblemaniac
Guest_Firemblemaniac
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 06:01 AM
...............I must admit some ideas AROUND evolution are, actually true. The survival of the fittest, is actually true. I admit THAT IDEA. MAYBE a few others, but that's it. I am a scholar. Try me!!!!! By the way......^^ youre an ***hole.POINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#480
Guest_Harlequin
Guest_Harlequin
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 07:10 AM
Look, people don't just get up and evolve. It takes BILLIONS of years. I don't think your brain can comprehend a number as big as a billion, so to put it in terms you can understand: if you sat down right now and counted to a billion by ones, counting one each second, it would take you 35 years if you didn't fall asleep.by the way did anyone think if evolution is real then why there almost(I cannot be sure)no one in the present evolve?There a anime that have some theory it call this ugly yet beautiful world
#481
Guest_triplelite
Guest_triplelite
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 08:46 AM
http://www.cstnews.c...e/FaithEvl.html^^ Thats opinion, not fact though.http://en.wikipedia....theory_and_factHere are some inconsistencies that have appeared...http://spiritsfire.m...?de_key=1875170http://spiritsfire.m...?de_key=1875859http://spiritsfire.m...?de_key=1876501All you retards keep saying evolution didn't happen, but yet to offer any actual proof. Only vague bullcrap like:"Theres the missing link that sorta falls out of logical explanation where there isn't a 'middle' species in the middle of the evolution of one species to another. Hmmm..."What the hell is this? Source quoted? Nope. Example in particular identified? Nope. Vague bullcrap? Yes. "Evolution is totally bogus. Period"Great use of the scientific method there, idiot." Evolution did not hapen. Science itself concludes that. look up the DNA code."Except for the fact that the DNA results of thousands of peer reviewed tests and scientific papers indicate otherwise, you are totally correct. (Just for the many dimwitted douchebags around here, that was sarcasm). Also the fact that no major scientific institution has ever said "Evolution did not hapen[sic]", also makes this point look a bit retarded. (The misspelling does no favors either.)The only proof that evolution didn't happen is that morons like you exist.
#482
Guest_Arcrode
Guest_Arcrode
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 09:11 AM
You call yourself a scholar? You're a bit too wrong (and too arrogant in my opinion) to call yourself a scholar, at least in this subject.First, I'll quote myself from this very thread:^ Explain that, Mr. Darwin. Where did all the ' Intermediate' species go? and evolution does NOT make sence, because DNA cannot change into another. pwnd!
You were "pwnd" before you even said anything. In case you were wondering, those changes occur from changes in DNA.Second, you're not correct about saying DNA never changes. The most obvious of which is cancer. Wiki it. But since you're probably too lazy, here it is:And are you talking about missing links; the idea where fossils that show the small changes between species are missing? Because if you are, that's where the idea of punctuated equilibrium comes in. Originally people believed that there were lots of little, constant changes that would eventually lead to something else (gradualism). But punctuated equilibrium says that those small differences don't really amount to anything. Instead change comes in jumps. For example, a baby will be born with a defect and have eyes on the back of it's head. The idea of gradualism is that all the little differences (like having a mouth that is a little bit bigger) wouldn't help it to survive any more than if it were normal. Instead, when something with a major difference comes, it'll have an actual impact on that creature's ability to survive. That explains why you can't find the fossils in between the animal with normal eyes and the one with eyes on the back of its head; it never existed.
.Note, they can also be randomly acquired through error in DNA replication. While it is true there are enzymes (or something else) that check for mistakes in the DNA coding, they don't always catch everything. Consider how many and how often cells divide in one person in one day. Multiply by 5 billion for the number of people and then multiply that by however much time you want, and seeing those mistakes isn't that difficult. It's incredible that there aren't that many mistakes considering this information.Nearly all cancers are caused by abnormalities in the genetic material of the transformed cells. These abnormalities may be due to the effects of carcinogens, such as tobacco smoke, radiation, chemicals, or infectious agents. Other cancer-promoting genetic abnormalities may be randomly acquired through errors in DNA replication
Edited by Arcrode, 14 October 2007 - 09:12 AM.
#483
Guest_Firemblemaniac
Guest_Firemblemaniac
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 04:49 PM
All messed up DNA is destroyed before it goes into your body. Beat that!!!! OCC: Me? Arrogant? I think you people are all wasting your time. BTW............. you call ME lazy? who the h*ll do you think you are? You don't even know me.....
Edited by Firemblemaniac, 14 October 2007 - 04:51 PM.
#484
dirago
-
- Member
-
- 103 posts
Hatchling
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 14 October 2007 - 05:03 PM
He doesn't need to know you to call you lazy.You call yourself a scholar yet your information and 'facts' prove the opposite, which means that as a 'scholar' you are too lazy to go find the thruth.Did you even read the post above you? Your reply doesn't seem to show it, therefore I would also qualify you as 'lazy'
There, now read it.]Note, they can also be randomly acquired through error in DNA replication. While it is true there are enzymes (or something else) that check for mistakes in the DNA coding, they don't always catch everything. Consider how many and how often cells divide in one person in one day. Multiply by 5 billion for the number of people and then multiply that by however much time you want, and seeing those mistakes isn't that difficult. It's incredible that there aren't that many mistakes considering this information.
Do you have idea how wrong you are with that statement?First of all there is no 'messed up' DNA. As a 'scholar' were have you ever heard someone with any mental capacity said that?DNA is not something that you can 'inject' into your body, therefore how can it "Go into your body?"All messed up DNA is destroyed before it goes into your body.
#485
Guest_Chaoskid36
Guest_Chaoskid36
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 06:31 PM
me lol i think i watch those silly programmes like discovery channels when i felt boredPOINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#486
Guest_Firemblemaniac
Guest_Firemblemaniac
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 06:37 PM
Alright, I am not a scholar. I have read my school text book, however, and seen the faults in the Theory of evolution.OCC: I am lazy, though I hate to admit it.
#487
Guest_Dewsmurf
Guest_Dewsmurf
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 06:39 PM
my mom believes in evolutin.POINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#488
Guest_Firemblemaniac
Guest_Firemblemaniac
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 06:40 PM
how about you? do you?POINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#489
···
-
- Dragon's Elite
-
- 928 posts
·
Reputation: 0
Neutral
Posted 14 October 2007 - 07:16 PM
You're about as much a scholar as all of the other ignoramuses here. Reading your science text book does not make you the definitive word of existence. DNA changes all of the time. I'll quote a member here:I am a scholar.
Wrong.The most obvious change is sexual reproduction! DNA changes whenever sexual reproduction takes place, because it incorporates the genes of two parents, in which the dominant traits and recessive traits do their thing. When the chromosomes divide, who's to day that everything goes flawlessly?DNA doesn't need to change during a lifespan; it can change in the first cell of an organism right after sperm and egg combine.And it's not an instantaneous thing. It's punctuated equilibrium or phyletic gradualism. I'm willing to say that both can and do occur. It doesn't just grow wings because it wants. It does so due to a mutation that is further mutated into wings, after a plethora of years.Second, you're not correct about saying DNA never changes. The most obvious of which is cancer.
Someone, make something better.
#490
Guest_Nessx007
Guest_Nessx007
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 07:21 PM
Im not touching this with a ten foot pole.POINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.
#491
Guest_Arcrode
Guest_Arcrode
-
- Guest
Posted 14 October 2007 - 09:58 PM
Wow, I can't believe I didn't say that. I feel kind of stupid. But in my defense, I thought firemblemanic was talking about within a generation, not between it. Obviously, change usually occurs between generations. Basically, I had thought he couldn't think DNA never changed throughout history, because I figured nobody thought that. So I assumed he was talking about something that seemed less incorrect, which is DNA can't change within a lifespan. While change through punctuated equilibrium may not be as quick as I made it sound, it is still relatively quick. You gets bursts and then stasis. And I never said change happens because a creature wanted the new trait. The changes that are harmful or neutral don't really add anything to what I'm saying so I didn't mention it (or at least not too much if I did).You're about as much a scholar as all of the other ignoramuses here. Reading your science text book does not make you the definitive word of existence. DNA changes all of the time. I'll quote a member here: Wrong.The most obvious change is sexual reproduction! DNA changes whenever sexual reproduction takes place, because it incorporates the genes of two parents, in which the dominant traits and recessive traits do their thing. When the chromosomes divide, who's to day that everything goes flawlessly?DNA doesn't need to change during a lifespan; it can change in the first cell of an organism right after sperm and egg combine.And it's not an instantaneous thing. It's punctuated equilibrium or phyletic gradualism. I'm willing to say that both can and do occur. It doesn't just grow wings because it wants. It does so due to a mutation that is further mutated into wings, after a plethora of years.
#492
Guest_PheonixGRX
Guest_PheonixGRX
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:05 AM
well, there'd have to be evolution, I mean, how would we change then?
#493
Guest_ChairMaster
Guest_ChairMaster
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:07 AM
LOL @ fundies playing scientist.The truth is evolution, though not proven, is the most likely explanation to where we came from.
#494
Guest_m00chur
Guest_m00chur
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:08 AM
Everybody...please do not criticize this fellow...he is a fine example of Darwanism. He is weak...therefore his genes will not carry on...therefore ridiculously DENSE and ignorant people like him will just simply go away. Hope for a brighter future without these retards.All I'm saying is that although there is what evolutionists (in general, mind you) would like to present as substantial evidence in support of evolution, there is also an even greater amount of evidence (though oftenly suppressed or ignored) which has arisen from or been taken as a sample from those same evolutionist's findings!! Ex) the "fossil" record? evolutionists would present that from the fossil record can be found many examples of creatures "evolving" into some state we witness today. However, if a person were to use common sense, taking into account that on the basis of the evolutionists' statements every creature here today is evolved from some previous form, shouldn't we be able to find MILLIONS of such examples, and not just the few we see today???? Just one example of many. Topic open to opinions...
#495
Guest_MBM10
Guest_MBM10
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 02:40 AM
Actually, that doesn't sound like the people who persecuted Galileo at all, because I'm not taking all YOU idiot evolutionists to court for blasphemy, I'm just saying that God created us, and gets the "jollies" from all living life, as it is a beautiful thing. You can take all your evidence and shove it. There are things that are unexplained and always will be. There is also evidence that someone broke into my house, but that doesn't necessarily means that happened. And please name one contradictory statement in the Bible, so I can prove your stupid theory wrong. Or is there any? F*** you. I'm pissed. I'm sure you have never experienced a miracle, and I hope you never do.You know, you sound a lot like the people who said Galileo was going to hell for saying that the sun didn't revolve around the earth. I'm sure in a few hundred years, all of you idiot fundamentalists might realize that we're talking about scientific fact here. Your bible contradicts itself, and parts of it are just plain wrong, in both the literal and moral sense. As I've previously stated, the evidence against an intelligent designer is overwhelming. And if there is a creator as you say, he sure as hell must get his jollies from making beetles, since there are over 350,000 different known species of them on this planet.
#496
Guest_hittokirrebattousai
Guest_hittokirrebattousai
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 08:53 PM
Thats not evolution your thinking of adaptation. POINTS were deducted for this post by OxygenarianPlease refer to the forum rules to find out why your points were deducted.i belive in evolution because everything allways change to suit their surondings
#497
Guest_darkcybo
Guest_darkcybo
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 09:02 PM
evolution has no purpose... it's just randomly mutating stuff but then natural selection kills off all the bad mutations and the good ones survive
#498
Guest_cetaphil
Guest_cetaphil
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 09:05 PM
Evolution is pretty realistic.(except for those stupid shows on the history or discovery channel who exaggerate it) Monkeys do share 99% of our DNA and all things cant just become what they are in an instant. Even though if you dont beailve in it and dont want to learn it then MOVE. Currently schools are using the idea of evolution in science class in Living enviroment.(lol i had a quiz on that like 2 weeks ago) They place labs on it, there are few states who refuse to beailve in evolution(i forgot what they are =/)
#499
Guest_HorraGlydestep
Guest_HorraGlydestep
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 09:12 PM
Okay before I begin I'd like to say something. Unlike most people on the internet who like to enflate their ego by sounding incredibly smart, because they know the URL to Dictionary.com and I'm not going to pladejurise other peoples writings. So back on topic! :3I'm more or less an Atheist/Buhdist, so I'll accept that you have your own beliefs, but I'm not going to accept that some almighty created me out of a bunch of mud. Sorry not buying that b.s.Now however there are even a few exceptions with me, that most people scratch their heads over or call me a hypocrit about. Don't like it, too bad.The religions of Jahova and I think Mormon. I'm not 100% sure if it is those two or not. Like I said, I'm not some super genious. But two religions that are now for some reason accepted by the Vatican, broke one of the old cardnal rules; they added on to the four original books of the Bible with Jahova and whatever one that John Smith guy made up.Religion is a farse and I personally belive that anyone who belives that their soul has a chance to burn in hell, it will and I hope it does.Hmm... I think I'm done being an utter... well you know.
#500
Guest_P.O.L
Guest_P.O.L
-
- Guest
Posted 20 October 2007 - 09:17 PM
Pssht... Anyone who thinks that humaity's getting better and more advanced over time is living in a fairy tale. Sure, we may have superior technology, but the people are getting dumber, number, less spiritual, and less intellectual. It no wonder we've fallen so low as a whole. Look at it as if it were a piece of rope. Do the threads wind tighter over time? No. They begin to unwind and loosen as they age. This is what happens when humans try to rely on their own abilities. Only God can help us grow. Anyone who clings to the fairy tale that is macro-evolution (not to be confused with micro-evolution) is deluding himself and wrapping himself in deception.
